Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ed@w0yk.com: 551 ]

Total 551 documents matching your query.

41. [RTTY] NA RTTY Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 08:53:45 -0800
Make plans to operate the NA RTTY Sprint this coming Saturday (00-04z Sunday, 13 March). If the sprint format is troublesome or you think you lose too many "jump balls", just fine a clear frequency a
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00084.html (8,135 bytes)

42. [RTTY] Sending 'QSY' (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:10:52 -0800
In the CW and SSB Sprints, we all get along fine without sending QSY. TU, R or E^E have worked great for years now. Why does RTTY have to be different? I suppose there's no harm in sending QSY in pla
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00110.html (7,666 bytes)

43. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:01:42 -0800
On all three modes, the informal Sprint format for years has been: CQ WW3S WW3S NA W0YK W0YK WW3S 23 JAMIE PA WW3S 14 ED CA W0YK R Placing your call sign at the end of your exchange is the convention
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00111.html (8,780 bytes)

44. Re: [RTTY] NA SPRINT RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 07:17:55 -0700
Email your Cabrillo file to me and I'll take a look. 73, Ed - W0YK NCJ NA RTTY Sprint Manager -- www.ncjweb.com/contests.php _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@con
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00114.html (7,691 bytes)

45. Re: [RTTY] NA SPRINT RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 09:03:27 -0700
For the benefit of others, the problem was that all but one CATEGORY-**: ** lines were missing from the Cabrillo header, yet the NCJ web form reported "no Cabrillo errors". But, the form was still st
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00115.html (9,577 bytes)

46. Re: [RTTY] NA SPRINT RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 09:26:02 -0700
Typo corrected below ... For the benefit of others, the problem was that all but one CATEGORY-**: ** lines were missing from the Cabrillo header, yet the NCJ web form reported "no Cabrillo errors". B
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00117.html (8,939 bytes)

47. Re: [RTTY] [WriteLog] NA SPRINT RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:38:28 -0700
Actually, the original header already was labeled version 3. However, the problem would have existed with either version because there was no power declaration of category. Ed - W0YK ________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00121.html (12,402 bytes)

48. Re: [RTTY] WAZ progress? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 01:30:03 -0700
ST2AR is very active in major RTTY contests. It is hard to NOT work Robert, e.g. in CQ WW RTTY last fall and CQ WPX RTTY last month. Plus, he has been great in making schedules for people needing ST.
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00161.html (8,029 bytes)

49. [RTTY] NA RTTY Sprint Logs Due Saturday (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:10:28 -0700
RTTY Sprint logs are due 04Z Sunday (Saturday evening, NA time) at which time log checking will commence. Pre-publication results are expected on the NCJ website by Monday. One log had 141 unique cal
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00200.html (6,916 bytes)

50. [RTTY] NA RTTY Sprint Results Online (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 23:48:56 -0700
Pre-publication results for last weekend's RTTY Sprint are now online at http://www.ncjweb.com/sprintrttyprelim.php. Please let me know if there are any questions ASAP in case there is an error we ca
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00243.html (6,969 bytes)

51. Re: [RTTY] RST in contests (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:46:41 -0700
1. If RST is part of the exchange defined in the contest rules, always send it. Contest sponsors do expect this rule to be followed and some will DQ an entry for not sending it. 2. Few contest sponso
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00266.html (9,846 bytes)

52. Re: [RTTY] CQWW results? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 20:29:36 -0700
Jamie, WW3S, asked: Yes, as always. The May issue is printed and being distributed now. Yes, around mid-May. 73, Ed - W0YK CQ RTTY Contest Director -- w0yk@cqwwrtty.com www.cqwwrtty.com www.cqwpxrtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-04/msg00120.html (6,771 bytes)

53. Re: [RTTY] are cqww logs "public" ? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 18:34:24 -0700
The CQ WW RTTY public log access is not yet set up. I'm working on it. 73, Ed - W0YK CQ RTTY Contest Director -- Ed Muns w0yk@cqwwrtty.com www.cqwwrtty.com www.cqwpxrtty.com www.facebook.com/cqrtty _
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-05/msg00044.html (7,656 bytes)

54. [RTTY] Photos From Dayton RTTY Forum? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:55:50 -0700
Several people took photos at the Dayton RTTY Forum of the 2010 CQ WW RTTY plaque recipients. Would you please email me copies for the website and Facebook page. Thanks! Ed - W0YK CQ RTTY Contest Dir
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-05/msg00107.html (6,790 bytes)

55. Re: [RTTY] NEW! The 10-Meter RTTY Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 14:40:35 -0700
Good point, although there will undoubtedly be different opinions on this. First of all, I do not think RTTY should be added to the Mixed category. The current Mixed category with CW and SSB works we
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-05/msg00120.html (8,634 bytes)

56. Re: [RTTY] Self spotting question (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:47:27 -0700
While technically one might argue this situation is not "primary" self-spotting, I personally would not do it. I think it is better to take the high road and stay away from any form of self-spotting.
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00057.html (8,379 bytes)

57. Re: [RTTY] NAQP practice? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:56:41 -0700
Ron, K0IDT, asked: sent 10 July to this reflector ... ** North American QSO Party on RTTY is Saturday July 16th, 2011. The party runs from 1800Z July 16 (Sat) to 0600Z July 17 (Sun). Rules, results a
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00111.html (8,538 bytes)

58. Re: [RTTY] so2r controller choice (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:45:17 -0700
Jeff, AC0C, asked: That's right. For RTTY, you really don't need a SO2R controller. I often just use mono-stereo cabling to put the receive audio from each radio into the left or right ear of the hea
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00114.html (8,422 bytes)

59. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY 10 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:50:12 -0700
Try 10m (and 15m) often during the day and call CQ for a while, every hour or half-hour. The band may seem closed if no one is calling CQ. Ed - W0YK _______________________________________________ RT
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00131.html (6,797 bytes)

60. [RTTY] O vs. 0 (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:22:54 -0700
In the context of 'W4HOD/O", /zero is clearly what the station was communicating and that's what should be logged. "Log what you copy" is being taken far too literally in cases like this. "Log what t
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00153.html (9,441 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu