Mail Archive Search: <+from:eedwards@oppd.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:eedwards@oppd.com: 267 ]

Total 267 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:12:32 +0000; And if you do all this, we want a link to a video showing the event! ;-) how much time and effort have you already spent on this? how much more is it going to cost to get your antique noise hunting s; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00201.html (19,632 bytes)
222. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 17:54:05 +0000; Ed, OK, so you say the FCC has the "right" to "ask for data" and/or to "test the unit" themselves, and the FCC "should" do those things; however, is there currently a regulation, rule or law that req; /archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00004.html (14,048 bytes)
223. Re: [RFI] Link-coupled loop - more. (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 15:04:54 +0000; Ken, It sounds like you are trying to track RFI like it is just ordinary RF. It may not be acting like an ordinary RF signal. Also, you will be seeing multiple RFI sources in multiple ways everywhere; /archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00029.html (12,486 bytes)
224. Re: [RFI] VDSL (very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber line) (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:37:06 +0000; Joe, Glad to hear you prevailed without needing to fight it yourself. I stand corrected on that point. However, it is also city ordinances that seem to become the tough battle in many cases with no H; /archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00172.html (16,082 bytes)
225. Re: [RFI] Question for all and ARRL (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 20:51:50 +0000; I'm not sure if it is still active or not (haven't seen a post in awhile), but you might try running the legal question past the Ham-Law reflector on altlaw.com (ham-law-request@altlaw.com) Personall; /archives//html/RFI/2014-05/msg00049.html (9,178 bytes)
226. Re: [RFI] Utility coming tomorrow to chase RFI (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 15:53:04 +0000; Are you receiving it at 400Mhz also? Then you know you're close to the source on power lines and can start looking for hardware. 73, de ed -K0iL They are riding the lines again - a more senior linema; /archives//html/RFI/2014-06/msg00005.html (10,437 bytes)
227. Re: [RFI] Utility coming tomorrow to chase RFI (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 18:25:03 +0000; Any transmission line that is conducting RF noise will do this on HF. Transmission lines conduct the noise on the power line away from the noise source--for miles in many cases. And it can induce the; /archives//html/RFI/2014-06/msg00012.html (10,256 bytes)
228. Re: [RFI] Noisy computer Power Supply (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 15:51:28 +0000; Unless some noise is traveling over AC power cables, or some other indirect path. De ed -K0iL What matters is spacing to your ANTENNAS, NOT the radios. 73, Jim K9YC __________________________________; /archives//html/RFI/2014-06/msg00045.html (8,796 bytes)
229. [RFI] FW: Low Band Interference Report (non-ham radio reports) (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 15:57:58 +0000; NY DOT reports they have been experiencing severe interference issues with their low band radios and have found the culprit to be high efficiency fluorescent ballasts. They have narrowed it down to t; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00009.html (8,827 bytes)
230. Re: [RFI] New EOC Building (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:24:20 +0000; Rod, You might do some word searches of Motorola's R56 Standard. It's the most thorough I've found to date for comm sites. It has sections on interior and exterior lighting, but it was initially writ; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00029.html (8,846 bytes)
231. Re: [RFI] New EOC Building (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:24:07 +0000; You make a good point Jim. There's nothing I could find in the guidelines/standard aimed at operations below 30MHz. However, an EOC is a really just special Comm Site. I wouldn't ignore industry reco; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00032.html (9,503 bytes)
232. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:55:29 +0000; "I am not enough of a lawyer to know what the line is for how much I can help a grower quiet down an operation, it is after all still not legal federally..." I'm not a lawyer either. I too am wonderi; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00064.html (10,649 bytes)
233. Re: [RFI] Cree LED Light Bulb (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:25:06 +0000; I have to admit my experience with CFL bulbs has been very limited until the last few years. So I might be and probably am missing something in this discussion. No one seems to be accounting for the; /archives//html/RFI/2014-08/msg00023.html (11,826 bytes)
234. Re: [RFI] Nature's RFI on the way. (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:33:01 +0000; Another good article on the subject from IEEE 2 years ago with good sidebar articles and video: "Of all the parts of the power grid, high-voltage transformers are among the most likely to fail in a g; /archives//html/RFI/2014-09/msg00022.html (9,420 bytes)
235. [RFI] FCC Updates Equipment Certification Rules (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 16:10:02 +0000; I know there have been discussions in this group about FCC certification so thought some of you might be interested in this recent change in the FCC's equipment authorization process. http://www.comm; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00017.html (7,947 bytes)
236. Re: [RFI] w7ekb & ground rods (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 21:45:36 +0000; Excellent point Jim. All services' grounds (AC, telephone, television, internet and ham shack cable entry point & ham tower) must be bonded to a single-point ground system. There's no limit on number; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00116.html (9,403 bytes)
237. Re: [RFI] w7ekb & ground rods (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:03:48 +0000; Here's a couple. http://www.kf7p.com/KF7P/Products.html http://www.smithspower.com/brands/polyphaser/ There are several others; probably Talley, Tessco, Texas Towers, AES, & HRO may have some as well; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00117.html (10,663 bytes)
238. Re: [RFI] w7ekb & ground rods (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:47:37 +0000; Frank, You might know this since you have some tall towers up in the air. Did the contradictions between NEC (copper ground rods) and EIA/TIA-222F (12.2.2-galvanized steel ground rods) ever get resol; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00136.html (10,636 bytes)
239. Re: [RFI] w7ekb & ground rods (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 22:07:25 +0000; Jim, I'm not sure if the lightning protection measures are tailored to VHF/UHF sites in any way I can see. Lightning doesn't care what band the antennas and equipment are. They all blow up the same w; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00137.html (12,619 bytes)
240. Re: [RFI] w7ekb & ground rods (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:23:43 +0000; Rik, In quick scan couldn't find anything on NEC Article 250 supporting your statement. Did you find anything in 250? I only found a reference to "6 ft minimum" distance, but that might be old refere; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00158.html (12,966 bytes)

Current List: 221 - 240
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]