Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ 88 ]

Total 88 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Log Analysis. (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:29:10 +0000 (GMT)
I have been looking at some old CQWW CW logs for hints and tips, to discover how some of the top guns operate. In some of them I came across apparantly glaring anomolies which did not accord with my
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00354.html (8,647 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Re : Log Analysis. (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:28:50 +0000 (GMT)
Thanks Doug and others. I did not say that this was illegal, perhaps my post implied it as I had a couple of offlist mails which assured me that there would be only one transmitted signal at any giv
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00363.html (8,452 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] RAEM Contest. (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:39:52 +0000 (GMT)
Could anyone provide a link to SRR pages for previous results for above contest, preferably english language pages. Thanks in advance. Brian 5B4AIZ. _______________________________________________ CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00392.html (6,407 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Lebanon Licensing. (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
I am only a 50 minute flight away from OD5 and for some time have been attempting to discover how to obtain a licence. They do not have a CEPT agreement in place. I want to know the possibility of ob
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00000.html (6,807 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] UN DX Contest - Spring 2009. (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Looking for help from any Russian speakers who entered this one. The results just issued suggest there are some serious issues with the checking software. My UBN which was made available looks a joke
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00119.html (7,304 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Results. (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 06:47:17 +0000 (GMT)
We are now only about 3 weekends away from the SSB contest and yet last years results have not appeared online. Publication in CQ mag was some 3 months ago so why have they not yet appeared on the we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00015.html (7,154 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op + Pit Crew (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:53:17 +0000 (GMT)
There sould not be any shades of gray. Single operator says what it means. Once that contest clock starts to tick then you should be on your own. The following rules taken from the WRTC website for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00056.html (8,007 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Backwards thinking in log checking (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:49:48 +0000 (GMT)
Absolutely Dave. The message that guys have to take on board is that if they do not log dupes, or refuse to work what they think will be a dupe, they could and will lose the points for what they thin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00078.html (11,279 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Survey results #4 - Operating Time Limits (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:07:02 +0000 (GMT)
I am open to the idea of creating a limited time category. However, I dont want to give people a reason not to be on the air and making contacts! What do you think is the best solution? (K5ZD). Your
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00128.html (9,836 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 17:43:19 +0000 (GMT)
When I lived in Falmouth Cornwall UK more than 20 years ago I helped out from time to time on the maritime mobile net which was run by a another Falmouth ham, Rudi G4FTO. IIRC it was either this same
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00098.html (12,576 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC 24 hours M/M (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 05:36:02 +0000 (GMT)
And just how do you do that  peter?   It depends what floats you boat. Personlly I have little interest in a contest which penalises you for the other uys mistake. Moreover, as a semi rare dx stn, I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00064.html (9,271 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC 24 hours M/M (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:59:21 +0000 (GMT)
Igor.   So an artificial log can be created and those points can be allowed.   I don't feel that I am 'nit picking' if I ask how do they know that the operator of that non combatant station copied m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00086.html (11,336 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:52:37 +0000 (GMT)
Bravo Jim - I doubt that anything can be added to that.   Problem is that the technology ops just can't see it as a different world.   Shame tho' to see the loss of interest from lot's of the top guy
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00255.html (15,951 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] a little more fairness? (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 18:09:45 +0000 (GMT)
Having followed this debate I do feel that Prasad does make a very good suggestion with regard to the award of two points per inter-asian contacts, same would stand for inter oceana too.. It seems to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00167.html (19,124 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] WPX QRM - Time For A Rethink. (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 01:23:30 +0100 (BST)
  I dust off the mic just a couple of times per year for the two 'big ones'. I began about 6.00am Saturday and around five or six hours into the event began to wonder 'What the heck am I doing here?'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00278.html (9,265 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Club/Group competition (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:41:11 +0100 (BST)
. I wonder if someone until today has checked if the participants were members of a specific club or were inside the distance's limitation... 73 Kostas sv1dpi Obviously not Kostas, Certainly in EU th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-04/msg00094.html (10,784 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] KR2Q - RX1CQ (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 07:14:53 +0100 (BST)
What this debate highlights is the anomoly of creating only one listing for the QRP section, whereas every other section is divided, NA & Rest of the World.   Because of the different scoring systems
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00022.html (10,891 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] web site or copy and pastejournalism (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:33:51 +0100 (BST)
Absoulutely no doubt about it. Jamie should publish a retraction by way of an apology to the LZ9W group - that's the way things should be done.   73 Brian C4Z.       From: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00175.html (13,424 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Changes to EU Sprints (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:54:43 +0100 (BST)
    Very interesting to see that not only are these logs are open to public view but also the ubn reports. I don't know if permission is a pre-requisite of entry but can imagine the storm if CQ or AR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00320.html (9,454 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes in CQ sponsored contests (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:02:43 +0100 (BST)
Sure you are ok Hank. In the other guys log there is no 'dupe'and he will get a bust for the first contact with the bad call. Your second contact is marked as a 'dupe' in your scored log with no pena
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00322.html (9,285 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu