Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:geoiii@kkn.net: 270 ]

Total 270 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 20:21:53 -0700
Why would he say QRZ if he has your call wrong? Do you give him a report even though he came back to and said your callsign incorrectly? You should not give him a report. If you give him a report you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00039.html (11,087 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Little Gun Dilemma: Callsign not acknowledged (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
Date: Tue Feb 19 15:36:08 2002
This is the right thing to do - keep sending just your call until you hear you call come back. This is the way I do it now - unless I know I am very loud and can be sure I can get his attention. It
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00285.html (9,017 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] W/VEs spotting W/VEs (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
Date: Thu Feb 21 16:52:30 2002
As I understand it that is the reason for the entire packet spotting system - it is to alert others to the frequency of station. ?? -- George Fremin III "When a true genius appears in the world, John
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00342.html (7,648 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] W/VEs spotting W/VEs (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
Date: Fri Feb 22 07:06:50 2002
Right. But he did not say that - he kinda danced around the issue. Why not just say it? Something like: "It appeared to me that many of the USA spots were done by club members or close friends or may
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00359.html (9,410 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Assisted? (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
Date: Wed Mar 6 19:23:07 2002
It is a rules violation even if they are in a catagory that allows assistance. http://www.arrl.org/contests/announcements/rules-all.html 3.14. In contests where spotting nets are permissible, spottin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00068.html (8,414 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Assisted? (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
Date: Thu Mar 7 14:50:22 2002
You mean like this: N9US 21345.1 ZF2MM Paul,K9PG needs your QSO! ZF0106 02 Mar 2002 N9US 21346.1 ZF2MM give Paul a point! ZF0118 02 Mar 2002 N9US 21346.0 ZF2MM Be part of a RECORD! ZF0222 02 Mar 200
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00080.html (60,592 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Assisted? (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
Date: Fri Mar 8 09:18:21 2002
I understand - and I think that is clear to anyone looking at this list and knowing anything about the fact that W3LPL puts out alot of spots. -- George Fremin III "When a true genius appears in the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00092.html (11,564 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Re: Assisted? (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
Date: Fri Mar 8 10:38:13 2002
http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/2002-March/046632.html This was an error - if you look at the list you will notice that the first half of the list is sorted by the number of spots posted by a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00096.html (7,584 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Re: Assisted? (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
Date: Sat Mar 9 05:46:03 2002
This is a good question and I do know the answer. My gut feeling is that any marketing done is usually done with the intention to help the person doing the marketing. I was prompted to post the list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00116.html (9,791 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] WRTC 1990 (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:06:43 -0700
I am compiling WRTC results. One bit of data I would like but can not seem to find anywhere is the callsigns that each of the teams used in WRTC 1990. I would also like to know the callsigns of the s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00552.html (6,863 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] WRTC 1990 calls and scores (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:40:24 -0700
The prize goes to I2UIY - Paolo had just what I was looking for. I will post it below so others can find it in the future. -- QTH OPERATORS CALLSIGN | F I N A L | | CW SSB USED | QSO |MULT| SCORE | M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00563.html (8,646 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000MP (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 06:39:04 -0700
Your above statements are very general and in my experience seem to be somewhat skewed. I think you will find that that while the FT-1000xxxx radios are indeed the most popular in the 'big gun' ham s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00629.html (11,737 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating Methods or Equipment? (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 06:40:59 -0700
It should not be discouraging. There are several factors, the biggest one is that as you state this was "my second contest *ever*". I am willing to bet that this was not UN7LZ's second contest or eve
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00830.html (10,125 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] N3BB IARU SOAB CW (Long Comments) (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 22:00:51 -0700
I think that if done right contests should be hard. If you are not totally spent at the end then my guess is that you did not give the contest everything you had. I find that I have to make an effort
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00901.html (9,026 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] WRTC 1990 (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:06:43 -0700
I am compiling WRTC results. One bit of data I would like but can not seem to find anywhere is the callsigns that each of the teams used in WRTC 1990. I would also like to know the callsigns of the s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01141.html (6,863 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] WRTC 1990 calls and scores (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:40:24 -0700
The prize goes to I2UIY - Paolo had just what I was looking for. I will post it below so others can find it in the future. -- QTH OPERATORS CALLSIGN | F I N A L | | CW SSB USED | QSO |MULT| SCORE | M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01152.html (8,646 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Penalties (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:10:20 -0700
Delete the QSO .... that is not what you were pushing for a few years ago: On 6-Sep-2000 K3BU said: http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-09/msg00052.html -- Speaking statistical
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00244.html (9,478 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Penalties (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 16:16:17 -0700
Did you read the thread? http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-09/msg00035.html It and several of the related ones that kicked the thread off were all about the 'penalty thing'.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00252.html (10,288 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Multipliers (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 07:52:30 -0700
I will make a guess. - The NAQP is not an ARRL contest so using ARRL sections seems slightly out of place. - An effort to make the exchange as simple and as user (or maybe newbie) friendly as possibl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00043.html (9,901 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi operations with single series of serialnumbers (WAE) (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 08:31:20 -0700
Seems really hard even if you use paper. If I read this rule correctly, it seems even harder. Multi Operator - Band changes are allowed every ten minutes; this also includes QTC traffic. Exception: w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00319.html (8,815 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu