Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:geoiii@kkn.net: 289 ]

Total 289 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [CTDXCC] CW Sprint: a W5 Team (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:25:54 -0500
The voluntary moment of silence suggested in the CW sprint results in the NCJ was for both W4AN and K4OJ. I miss both of these guys a lot. I think it is a fine idea. And I hope you and your guest op
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00200.html (9,749 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Cabrillo Log Sending Address Failure Notice (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 05:51:50 -0800
This was broken for a few hours last night. Please try sending your log again - it should no longer bounce. If it does let me know. Thanks -- George Fremin III - K5TR geoiii@kkn.net http://www.kkn.ne
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00003.html (7,380 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 07:21:02 -0800
I also would have no problem with a rule like that - I dont think I have started any contests in recent or not so recent memory with a frequecy more than a minute before the contest starts. -- George
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00348.html (9,764 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 07:34:27 -0800
mmmmm.... I have found that there are all sorts of things that might not be explicity prohibited by the rules but that many people do not do - some of these activites are clearly frowned on by other
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00349.html (10,795 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:06:50 -0800
In most contests this is called cheating. I and others have heard stations do this in a contest where it was not allowed and those stations were disqualified. If this is going on you should bring it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00842.html (10,193 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:01:46 -0800
I think I qualify as an SO2R op. I am not scared of you adding a category - you want categories? Go check out the WPX contest - it has a category for everyone. I guess when the SO1R category is added
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00847.html (14,206 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ordering TR-Log (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:51:37 -0800
geoiii@kkn.net k5tr@kkn.net k5tr@arrl.net info@trlog.com (about 20 others) http://www.trlog.com/ 512-636-5587 -- George Fremin III - K5TR geoiii@kkn.net http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr _____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00058.html (7,423 bytes)

48. [CQ-Contest] serious question (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
Date: Tue Jan 14 20:20:52 2003
This is easy. You toss that QSO. I would have never logged it during the contest. If I ask for a fill and the guy does not come back or has already moved on then we have not compleated the QSO. -- Ge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00147.html (7,342 bytes)

49. [CQ-Contest] serious question clarification (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
Date: Wed Jan 15 14:23:26 2003
Then keep it in your log and be more careful next time. -- George Fremin III - K5TR geoiii@kkn.net http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00169.html (8,213 bytes)

50. [CQ-Contest] serious question clarification (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
Date: Wed Jan 15 21:00:20 2003
I will confess to saying the above. Yeah - well I guess we could go back to the old SS scoring and get one point for sending and one for receiving. None of the contests that I am familiar with have a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00180.html (9,401 bytes)

51. [CQ-Contest] Old topic - New Wrinkle (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
Date: Wed Jan 22 05:03:39 2003
mmmmm..... I was what most would describe as a "guest op" when I operated from the W5KFT station. Whenever I did a single op contest I was the only person there - indeed the station owner was 300+ mi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00264.html (9,311 bytes)

52. [CQ-Contest] Old topic - New Wrinkle (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
Date: Wed Jan 22 05:17:49 2003
This is just as silly an idea now as it was when it was talked about in the pages of the NCJ in the 70's and 80's. I have been a regular "guest op" at two diffrent stations over the last 20 years. Fi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00265.html (10,937 bytes)

53. [CQ-Contest] SO2R rig placement (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
Date: Tue Jan 28 08:55:33 2003
I dont like having the radio above the surface of the desk as I like to have my forearm resting on the desk. If you are doing two radios correctly you will be tuning for 48 hours - keep that in mind
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00436.html (8,121 bytes)

54. [CQ-Contest] Callsign Advantages (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III)
Date: Mon Mar 10 13:13:51 2003
I was WB5VZL for 20+ years. This seems like a pretty good callsign. Kinda hard to say but the KHZ is catchy as in could you move down 8 Khz? I think K is great prefix and if you are in 8 land then I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00082.html (9,679 bytes)

55. [CQ-Contest] QRZed - guess again (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III)
Date: Thu Apr 3 12:36:43 2003
There have been a number of posts to this list recently saying that there is no reason for stations to ever just say QRZ or Thanks at the end of a contact. Indeed many posters are of the opnion that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00095.html (9,436 bytes)

56. [CQ-Contest] SO2R Orion - 4 bands at once? 4 amps? Hoy! (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III)
Date: Fri May 9 08:23:03 2003
I agree. I thought so too.... in fact AC5AA and I had a long email exchange about using a single Orion as opposed to two other radios because we both read the TenTec discription to be SO2R in a singl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00082.html (7,881 bytes)

57. [CQ-Contest] self spotting (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III)
Date: Sat May 31 09:18:01 2003
I thought all of the hoop-a-la was about self spotting. As it stands self spotting is cited in the rules of many contests as being forbidden for all categories. Even categories that can use packet. S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00337.html (7,929 bytes)

58. [CQ-Contest] VHF/UHF antennas for a truck (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III)
Date: Sat Jun 7 11:04:23 2003
Tree is correct - that would be effective. I would like to add that for you and others that do not have antennas for the VHF bands that you can still get on either with the 5/8 wave 2m vertical that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00107.html (10,209 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: [3830] CQWW CW P40E(CT1BOH) SOAB HP (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:18:40 -0600
I would be more than happy to start a web page to keep track of high rates. Just like the CQ Almanac used to do - it will be on the honor system. Send me your high rates and I will put them on the we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00162.html (9,112 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: [3830] CQWW CW P40E(CT1BOH) SOAB HP (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:48:37 -0600
Very cool. I was thinking of something more along the lines of the old CQ Almanac - it had most of the contests seperated out or maybe it was just the stateside contests like SS seperated out. -- Geo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00210.html (8,697 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu