Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jjreisert@alum.mit.edu: 963 ]

Total 963 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [CQ-Contest] re: LZ DX Contest ...uniques removed (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:16:01 -0400
At 11:23 AM 9/10/2003, yt3t wrote: Instead of removing uniques, who make it very difficult to be in anyone's log, I suggest that a committee remove those who make it easy in everyone's log, like KC1X
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00109.html (8,659 bytes)

142. Re: [CQ-Contest] unique contacts and logging errors (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 08:21:41 -0400
At 04:32 PM 9/11/2003, Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote: 46th Annual Pennsylvania QSO Party October 11 & 12! www.nittany-arc.org/paqso.html Ron, these are the 2002 rules. Where can we find the 2003 rules? 7
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00149.html (9,984 bytes)

143. Re: [CQ-Contest] W2SC's ARRL DX LCR feedback (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:12:28 -0400
state, as OH" ? Yes - W2SC did that. However, the log checking program isn't smart enough to do that. I know it seems simple enough, but this is an automated process that is done on 2000 logs. The pr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00191.html (11,264 bytes)

144. Re: [CQ-Contest] W2SC's ARRL DX LCR feedback (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
It wouldn't be in violation of ANY rules if he was operting from Finland! He's probably just confused, having stayed up all night in a 160 contest, sending 599 OH. 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00194.html (10,052 bytes)

145. Re: [CQ-Contest] Strange DX-Spots in WAE SSB .. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:32:44 -0400
At 06:16 AM 9/16/2003, Tonno Vahk wrote: If a station does not submit log but still makes a lot of QSOs in contest does it constitute participation or not? If not then he is obviously allowed to self
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00199.html (10,116 bytes)

146. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Software (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 07:44:58 -0400
At 10:26 PM 9/17/2003, Ward Silver wrote: Are there more important things? You bet there are. Catching cheaters, reducing reporting turnaround time, making it easier for people to submit logs, extend
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00207.html (8,769 bytes)

147. Re: [CQ-Contest] W2SC's ARRL DX LCR feedback (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 07:51:25 -0400
At 01:54 PM 9/17/2003, John Laney wrote: The present system appears to penalize those who abide by the rules by logging what was sent to them. I assume it does not penalize the rules violator, such a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00208.html (11,573 bytes)

148. Re: [CQ-Contest] W2SC's ARRL DX LCR feedback (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 07:52:27 -0400
At 05:45 PM 9/17/2003, Zack Widup W9SZ wrote: KH2D has lived in Florida for a couple years now. He just signs "KH2D". I think he probably gets a few people upset with him when they find out he's not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00209.html (9,757 bytes)

149. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH2D, et al.. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 22:02:33 -0400
At 10:11 AM 9/18/2003, Chuck K3FT wrote: Is there a possible way/place/means of posting a centralized list of these callsigns which would need to be noted such as kh2d being in w4 land? Or the k2g is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00223.html (11,404 bytes)

150. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Log Checking (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 22:05:32 -0400
At 12:32 PM 9/18/2003, Tree wrote: The FIRST requirement of a log checking process from my perspective is that it get the final order of finish "right". I do spend some time looking over close finish
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00224.html (8,973 bytes)

151. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 21:54:35 -0400
At 09:37 AM 9/26/2003, Dennis Ponsness WB0WAO wrote: Now that LoTW is up and running, I have a question for the "big guns" as well as the rest of us <grin>... Will you be uploading your contest logs
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00283.html (10,037 bytes)

152. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:11:55 -0400
At 06:16 AM 9/29/2003, Ed Parish K1EP wrote: Doesn't it make sense that the ARRL should enter contest logs into LoTW? After all, they can verify QSOs by cross checking the logs of many of the partici
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00308.html (11,365 bytes)

153. [CQ-Contest] Worked All Europe Contest IS NOT this Weekend (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
In case anyone else received this, the information is wrong. http://www.darc.de/referate/dx/fedcw.htm Dates: CW: August 9/10, 2003 (now history, see activity report) SSB: September 13/14, 2003 (now h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00314.html (9,072 bytes)

154. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Fee Schedule just released !!! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
Some people are into "instant gratification". Using LoTW, their needs can be met. I respond to direct QSLs within a week (I don't get many :-) but bureau cards can take years, depending on when I dec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00362.html (9,746 bytes)

155. [CQ-Contest] LoTW discussion group on Yahoo! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 08:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARRL-LOTW/ 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com PGP Fingerp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00042.html (7,625 bytes)

156. Re: [CQ-Contest] File Conversion Utilities (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
-- W0uo@cs.com asked: What about the WT4I Cabrillo tools? www.cabrillotools.com 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00085.html (8,660 bytes)

157. Re: [CQ-Contest] Country Files (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:30:15 -0400
Thanks for the reminder, Felix. I hope to post updated files sometime this weekend. Watch the reflectors! 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-25
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00119.html (7,701 bytes)

158. [CQ-Contest] 73 Magazine Says "73 and QRT" (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 11:50:48 -0400
Source: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2003/10/10/6/?nc=1 NEWINGTON, CT, Oct 10, 2003--After completing 43 years of publication, 73 Amateur Radio Today magazine is calling it quits. Plans to publis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00121.html (13,995 bytes)

159. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW SS question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 23:35:07 -0400
At 11:19 PM 10/11/2003, mike l dormann wrote: out of curiosity, how many SS CW stations would i expect to work on 160? I guess the question you have to ask is: Since you can only work a station once,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00140.html (8,485 bytes)

160. [ct-user] New Country Files for CT/NA/TR/WL - 16 October 2003 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 08:37:12 -0400
New country files have been uploaded to http://www.k1ea.com/cty/ Please read RELEASE.TXT for installation instructions. Here are the change notes: 16 October 2003 (CTY-1303) * Changed country name fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00186.html (9,670 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu