Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jjreisert@alum.mit.edu: 963 ]

Total 963 documents matching your query.

181. [CQ-Contest] Re: New program to analyze passes in a Cabrillo log (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 21:36:47 -0500
Has anyone else (besides N1XS) tried this program? It worked on another WinXP machine in the house that does not have the Cygwin library installed. Reply direct to me, please! - Jim At 08:10 AM 12/3/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00067.html (9,268 bytes)

182. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: New program to analyze passes in a Cabrillo log (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:05:58 -0500
At 09:25 PM 12/3/2003, Bryn Joynes N4VM wrote: I'm your casual contest participant, so don't know all the terminology. So was wondering after reading the explinations of a pass, if a station I just w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00071.html (9,092 bytes)

183. [CQ-Contest] FIXED: New program to analyze passes in a Cabrillo log (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:59:08 -0500
[The .ZIP file I uploaded Wednesday morning had a corrupted .EXE file in it (bad switch to ZIP program). It should be fixed now. Sorry for the troubles!] I wrote a short program which attempts to loc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00072.html (10,349 bytes)

184. [CQ-Contest] UPDATED: New program to analyze passes in a Cabrillo log (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 07:36:43 -0800 (PST)
Last night I uploaded Version 1.1 of my PASS analysis program: http://www.k1ea.com/utilities/pass.zip To read the original announcement: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/2003-12/msg00072.html
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00139.html (8,481 bytes)

185. [CQ-Contest] Re: UPDATED: New program to analyze passes in a Cabrillolog (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 07:58:41 -0800 (PST)
Ed Parish K1EP pointed out the current version doesn't work for VHF contests (thanks, Ed!). I'll put out a fix this weekend. 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00141.html (8,971 bytes)

186. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 00:09:12 -0500
At 11:46 AM 12/5/2003, Tom Frenaye K1KI wrote: Looking back at previous logs here we usually have about 100 dupes in a 3000 QSO log, and 140 dupes in a 4000 QSO log and 175 in a 5000 QSO log. I bet K
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00167.html (9,888 bytes)

187. [CQ-Contest] PASS version 1.2 released (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:37:29 -0500
I released a new version of the PASS program: http://www.k1ea.com/utilities/pass.zip This fixes a bug parsing VHF contest logs. Remember, this only runs in a DOS box under Windows - it will not run i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00192.html (8,016 bytes)

188. Re: [CQ-Contest] /MM in ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:43:49 -0800 (PST)
It would be nice if ARRL clarified the rules in this area, all it says is: 5.2.4. ITU regions (maritime mobiles only). CT accepts R1, R2 and R3. But I don't know if that's what the log checker expect
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00262.html (8,951 bytes)

189. [CQ-Contest] Re: R1 R2 R3 (ARRL 10m maritime mobile) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:34:40 -0800 (PST)
Thanks, Dan. == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com PGP Fingerprint: D8E2 3D78 339F A7F1 8C13 1193 B5D1 4
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00268.html (8,130 bytes)

190. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest computer - here's what I did (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 08:08:43 -0500
At 07:57 PM 12/12/2003, Steve Maki K8LX wrote: One method that is relatively painless (as painless as a MS OS can be anyway) is to simply reinstall the OS on top of the old one, let the new devices g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00273.html (9,965 bytes)

191. [CQ-Contest] Pass v1.3 released (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:25:22 -0500
The PASS program has been updated one more time. You can download version 1.3 from: http://www.k1ea.com/utilities/pass.zip Fixes this time around: * DOS compatibility * out-of-order logs didn't work
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00276.html (8,910 bytes)

192. Re: [CQ-Contest] Help w/ Logging (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 07:58:10 -0500
At 12:44 AM 12/16/2003, Rex Maner wrote: I logged 4 Q's with WA. stations on SSB but only desire a CW Only entry. Should I leave them in the Log with a note, or remove them and send a second log with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00304.html (9,339 bytes)

193. RE: [CQ-Contest] Help w/ Logging (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:35:46 -0500
Mike, I think you mis-understood the question. If W1XYZ makes 4 SSB QSOs, but doesn't submit them with his "CW" log, then the four stations who worked W1XYZ on SSB will get NILs for those QSOs. He *m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00328.html (11,212 bytes)

194. RE: [CQ-Contest] Help w/ Logging (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:12:40 -0800 (PST)
The log checking software must assume that a submitted log is complete. The software can therefore prove the presence or absence of QSOs between two stations. A non-submitted log can't prove that the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00341.html (10,619 bytes)

195. Re: [CQ-Contest] Help w/ Logging (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 23:22:49 -0500
At 03:33 PM 12/17/2003, David L. Thompson wrote: I think if this is true we are making the checking too complicated. The log checking should understand that he is a 80CW entry and all other contacts
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00356.html (11,033 bytes)

196. [CQ-Contest] T/S 2nd radio antenna restrictions (score: 1)
Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert)
Date: Mon Jun 4 12:51:25 2001
I finished in 2nd place in 1998 WPX SSB using just a G5RV dipole and a Cushcraft R7 vertical. Steve N8BJQ assured me that I could enter this category, and I did. 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00021.html (7,376 bytes)

197. [CQ-Contest] T/S 2nd radio antenna restrictions (score: 1)
Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert)
Date: Tue Jun 5 13:01:45 2001
If you want to win, choose the least-competitive category. If you want to improve your operating skills, then choose the MOST competitive category! 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Cou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00027.html (7,549 bytes)

198. [CQ-Contest] The best QSOs/hour on SSB/CW (score: 1)
Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert)
Date: Mon Jun 25 07:44:21 2001
N5TJ operating from P4 (I think) made 457/hour SSB in the CQWW a few years ago. 300/hour should be possible on CW, though I don't know of anyone who has done it. I'm sure it was done by DX, it's hard
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00175.html (8,726 bytes)

199. [CQ-Contest] WheeRU: Sheesh! (score: 1)
Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert)
Date: Mon Jun 25 11:40:37 2001
There's no rule that says you have to submit a log! If you're just working guys but not submitting a log, then there are essentially no limits as to what you can do. But if you don't submit a log, yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00190.html (7,226 bytes)

200. [CQ-Contest] The best QSOs/hour on SSB/CW (score: 1)
Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert)
Date: Tue Jun 26 11:11:45 2001
Maybe in terms of callers, but not in terms of exchange - serial numbers and states are too hard to copy. CQWW has the easiest exchange by far, and you can pretty much figure it out from the callsign
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00223.html (9,476 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu