Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k0xp@dandy.net: 113 ]

Total 113 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] DUMB CUT NUMBER (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Harrisonusa" <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:57:07 -0500 (EST)
I agree with that; but I maintain that if the sender is unable to "communicate" due to speaking or using language or abbreviations that others cannot understand, it's up to the others to let the sen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00350.html (11,270 bytes)

102. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut numbers and QRP (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Harrisonusa" <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:21:10 -0500 (EST)
........ And I rember working dozens of those, all the way back into the early '70s. What's so unusual bout it??????? "N" has LONG been known to represent "9" when used in a signal report or contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00417.html (8,050 bytes)

103. Re: [CQ-Contest] Regarding Check Numbers... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Harrisonusa" <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:29:46 -0500 (EST)
Actually, it's always been so; it's just that with e-mail reflectors like this, everybody can start kibitzing and moaning and groaning about how they got snookered, or beat out, or otherwise flummox
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00420.html (8,811 bytes)

104. Re: [CQ-Contest] "best practices" (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:38:18 +0000
I send my call before my exchange then immediately afterward again; I figger the double-callsign hits the DX as unusual enough to listen more closely and most often, they do come back with "K0XP TU".
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00505.html (7,878 bytes)

105. Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolution of the ARRL DX Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:50:56 +0000
Those oddball ASCII characters are because the sender used Rich Text or HTML to write their message. The server that passes on the post puts those in, and our text-only e-mail readers interpret them
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00513.html (8,497 bytes)

106. Re: [CQ-Contest] Good contact, back to you (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:02:44 +0000
Me, too. Technically, it should be only kilo but in reality, most of us say kilowatt when we mean K. In fact, if YOU say "kilo watt" to me as a phonetic for part of your callsign, I'm not going to un
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00522.html (9,571 bytes)

107. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Harrisonusa" <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:56:55 -0500 (EST)
For one thing, because the ARRL has said they will not allow DXCC credit when either log containing a claimed new DXCC credit has been made public in this way. CQ continues to fly in the face of thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00619.html (9,599 bytes)

108. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Harrisonusa" <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:43:14 -0500 (EST)
That seems to be the case; still, it would be nice for ARRL to respond to the question put to them last year about this issue and clarify it once and for all. It's sometimes not enough for them to l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00631.html (9,070 bytes)

109. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL SSB DX Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Harrisonusa" <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:17:31 -0500 (EST)
....... And then there is what we used to say back in the good ole days: "FULL GALLON!" *-) Steve, K0XP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00076.html (8,477 bytes)

110. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs - one more voice (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 03:27:35 +0000
If he sends you a QSL, why shouldn't you want to send one back to him?? Has nothing whatsoever to do with his contest log. Steve, K0XP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest maili
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00106.html (8,690 bytes)

111. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 05:17:24 +0000
Still, that's not written in stone; the DXCC rule, on the other hand, IS. Steve, K0XP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00112.html (10,405 bytes)

112. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 63, Issue 37 (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Harrisonusa" <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:28:38 -0400 (EDT)
CW-copying being nearly as easy as reading printed tomes, I keep wondering when some smartash will invent a machine to copy voice and transcribe it to CW so I can finally understand voice modes. I f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00377.html (8,128 bytes)

113. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Harrisonusa" <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:53:33 -0400 (EDT)
As a matter of fact, there used to be V/UHF propagation beacons on one or the other, I forget which one. They were maintained by a priest whom I believe retired some years ago and the beacons were t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00427.html (9,159 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu