Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k0xp@dandy.net: 113 ]

Total 113 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why Is it... (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:04:37 +0000
I begin such a nite with an ordinary CQ resulting in an ordinary QSO including exchanging QTH/name; then as the pileup grows over the following 10-15 minutes, cut out the extraneous chatter until we'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00198.html (11,944 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Please DO SOMETHING! (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:52:13 +0000
I worked quite a few of my 80m multipliers while CQing. It seemed that when their own rates dropped, they went S&Ping for the strongest, easiest-to-work, whether those were EU or NA or SA. I was even
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00276.html (10,733 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] Final NS Ladder #18 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:01:22 +0000
discussions with some fellow NS'ers, I don't understand why the following is such a difficult concept (which if practiced, could bring more NS Contesting Joy to all): turning your VFO dials from x.04
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00336.html (8,472 bytes)

64. [CQ-Contest] Contact with KG6B, Bob Hume?? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:16:10 +0000
All my efforts at finding a working e-mail addy for KG6B, Bob Hume, have come to naught. Yet, I've both heard him chasing DX on the higher bands, and seen evidence via recent web publications that he
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00341.html (7,625 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] wae cw station available again! (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:06:39 +0000
I can attest that it's heartfelt and genuine, although I've only been up there once. He's even added the basic capabilities for the V/UHF contests, and will do more if somebody ever really wants him
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00010.html (8,146 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] Pre-emptive QSLing - was:Contesters and LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Harrisonusa" <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:18:22 -0400 (EDT)
Not to change the subject TOO much; but this really got to me: Personally, I positively, absolutely HATE "forums". I belong to as few as possible and hardly ever frequent the few to which I belong. A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00101.html (8,368 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] Pre-emptive QSLing - was:Contesters and LOTW (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:38:38 +0000
WARNING: This reply has only peripheral on-topic content; so delete now if you're only interested in contest-talk ;o)))))))))))))) I don't even watch TV. In fact, if I were single (the wife watches T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00126.html (16,866 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:54:30 +0000
Some of us still aren't entirely proficient at entering callsigns for a dupe check the first time without a typo and so the logger "dupe-check" transmission-prevention feature doesn't catch our error
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00272.html (9,409 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] Euro's & BS7H (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:20:51 +0000
N8S! 100,000 Qs from N8S vs. something like 20,000 (IIRC) for BS7H; I'd expect N8S to be somewhat slower. Even if they only send out 20,000 cards, that's a substantial expense, too, at around a nickl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00084.html (7,628 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO R or not 2R? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 15:35:43 +0000
Actually, the Slow Speed NS is only 15 minutes, from 0200 to 0215Z. We usually call "CQ SNS" to differentiate with the normal-speed NS. So you have a 15 minute break before the "normal" NS. The whole
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00185.html (9,211 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] What to do? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 04:49:04 +0000
That's exactly what I used to do when I lived in SoCal. Only had one beam for the HF bands but built a power splitter using coax and selectively fed a vertical or dipole with it. Had three Dow Key re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00237.html (8,793 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:39:48 +0000
It would be far better and easier for all concerned if the rattiers simply stayed up the band as they used to. This would be easy for the ratty contest sponsors to control: simply list subband limits
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00007.html (7,900 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:23:04 +0000
I certainly do not remember, in the 42 years I've been contesting, EVER consistently hearing, throughout a weekend, ratty below 7035, let alone all the way down into the Extra class CW band. NEVER. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00023.html (10,326 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 01:54:18 +0000
Never had time to get on 40 for the TQP but was driving home from Vermont Friday nite, trying to find a spot to have a QSO that was NOT in the "DX" part of the CW band. Rattiers kept dropping down an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00048.html (9,265 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another CQWW question (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 02:01:11 +0000
Most major contest rules that say anything at all about it, state that a rig cannot be used under another callsign to make contest Qs unless it's a family station. In those contests, you would have t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00049.html (7,655 bytes)

76. Re: [CQ-Contest] say it ain't so! (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:08:47 +0000
Shall we call it the "solar winter"???? 8-(((((((( Oboy...... imagine how many folks will wind up with DXCC on 160, 80 and 40..... Steve, K0XP _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00227.html (9,033 bytes)

77. Re: [CQ-Contest] Paddle Opinions? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:10:30 +0000
Well, then: I'll claim my 1966-vintage tan-base Vibroplex paddle "takes a beating and keeps on beeping!" 8-) Seriously: the only damage mine has ever incurred was at Field Day with the Olathe club (K
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00232.html (13,432 bytes)

78. [CQ-Contest] GACW 2007 Results??? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 05:28:19 +0000
Although the results of the 2007 GACW are claimed to be available at http://gacw.no-ip.org/07results.pdf, no such file exists (nor its htm equivalent). Perhaps someone typoed the file name or didn't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00032.html (6,957 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Reminders (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 01:51:26 +0000
That would be just about exactly like the olden days of 2m voice-based spotting nets, since then replaced by packet spotting nets. The only real difference is when you called out a spot on a spotting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00079.html (8,552 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Inrad Service Divison (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 01:54:08 +0000
Actually, this being contest season and the guys owning INRAD these days being contesters (or at least one of them is, or was, last year), there may well be a delay of a few days. I encountered such
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00080.html (7,587 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu