Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k1ttt@arrl.net: 1156 ]

Total 1156 documents matching your query.

221. [CQ-Contest] neqp (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Wed Apr 30 23:49:20 2003
Watch the Undefeated M/S champs in action defending their title during NEQP at http://www.k1ttt.net/webcam/ (probably on camera 2) this weekend! Check out the rules at http://www.neqp.org/ and get on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00375.html (6,125 bytes)

222. [CQ-Contest] neqp (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Sun May 4 13:40:46 2003
Then NEQP is just half way over, the second session starts at 13z so you still have time! Rules at www.neqp.org See NEQP live on the web at http://www.k1ttt.net/webcam/simple1.html ! David Robbins K1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00026.html (6,430 bytes)

223. [CQ-Contest] self spotting abuses in WPX CW (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Sun May 25 21:15:26 2003
This is long. It contains lots of data. It will be controversial. I am presenting lots of observations that may have other explanations. Blame it on a rainy weekend with a s/o guest op. All that said
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00243.html (29,310 bytes)

224. [CQ-Contest] self spotting abuses in WPX CW (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Mon May 26 14:53:31 2003
Well so far its about 30 messages that like my expose, and none against. So the flame shields are untouched. Thanks to all who support my effort in this area. I won't try to respond to everyone indiv
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00248.html (10,135 bytes)

225. [CQ-Contest] self spotting abuses in WPX CW (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Mon May 26 14:59:03 2003
One more general comment. I do hope that this information gets back to the stations involved. Please pass the information along, copy and publish it on web sites or paper publications as you feel fit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00249.html (8,288 bytes)

226. FW: [CQ-Contest] self spotting abuses in WPX CW (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Mon May 26 22:09:21 2003
Here is one good example of why those initial observations may have other explanations. He explained that the two different IP routes are due to the satellite backup link from their isp vs the normal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00265.html (9,589 bytes)

227. [CQ-Contest] re: self spotting abuses in WPX CW (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (k1ttt@arrl.net)
Date: Tue May 27 06:59:44 2003
ah, but you missed one important point... this spot was not put in from a cluster node, it was put in using the web interface at www.dxsummit.com. -- This message was sent using Crocker Communication
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00274.html (7,742 bytes)

228. [CQ-Contest] node connectivity problems (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (k1ttt@arrl.net)
Date: Tue May 27 07:11:08 2003
On another part of kenny's post... my node is currently running with a backup isdn router that has in the past proven to be less than stable under heavy load. several times over the weekend i found
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00275.html (7,238 bytes)

229. [CQ-Contest] Re: Self Spotting in WPXCW (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Fri May 30 12:02:55 2003
node he can't Yes to both. You missed the whole point of my posting the data that I tracked down in real time during the contest. Yes, it is possible to track spots back to their source... and Yes,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00318.html (9,294 bytes)

230. [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting - You May be a Victim (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Fri May 30 14:39:03 2003
Interesting, The enter one For some reason the -@ doesn't show on the dxsummit search for that spot, but my node log for k1ttt-14 shows it coming from dxsummit with the -@. So I would expect that if
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00320.html (9,056 bytes)

231. Einstein, Cat, Radio was Re: [CQ-Contest] Pete Grillo,s magic! (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Sat May 31 11:52:33 2003
pull understand receive 0.0.0.1 obviously! What is it with physicists and cats anyway?? They all want to either pull their tails or stuff them in boxes. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00334.html (7,730 bytes)

232. [CQ-Contest] self spotting (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Sat May 31 15:16:07 2003
spotting time allow the have The network dupe filters can easily handle those situations. Many nodes only allow one spot per station within some frequency limit and some time limit, say 10 or 15 min
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00338.html (7,860 bytes)

233. [CQ-Contest] Packett can cheapen the competitor in all of us ifwe let it... (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Fri Jun 13 11:08:48 2003
"if we let it." Is the applicable phrase. 'Packet', or probably more correctly, 'dx spotting nets', are nothing new. Think back, way back, if you were in a populated area before there was packet ther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00170.html (9,423 bytes)

234. [CQ-Contest] PACKET (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Fri Jun 13 18:26:34 2003
your achieved You have obviously not used dx spotting with the current world wide network in a serious multi-op situation. Speak of that which you know, not what you imagine! David Robbins K1TTT e-m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00174.html (8,179 bytes)

235. [CQ-Contest] Packett can cheapen the competitor in all of usifwe let it... (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Fri Jun 13 18:33:50 2003
those of none, ah, a real democrat... this explains plenty. Instead of standing up for personal integrity and holding everyone to their word, you want the rule makers to add more rules to reduce the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00175.html (12,098 bytes)

236. [CQ-Contest] PACKET (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Sat Jun 14 11:33:11 2003
world operated just a lucky guess??? No, it is obvious from your statements that you know not what you are speaking of. wide A lucky guess??? I guess not! makes contact how the As I said, you don't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00181.html (9,811 bytes)

237. [CQ-Contest] RE: SCOURGES CONTINUED (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Sat Jun 14 21:54:23 2003
we deemed radio, of But bad operating skills have been around longer than packet spots. I remember before packet hearing people calling in pileups then after they work the guy asking 'whats your cal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00186.html (10,071 bytes)

238. [TowerTalk] RE: antenna party updates (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 20:07:24 -0000
Even if you can't be here try to check out the live tower party at http://www.k1ttt.net/webcam/, camera 1 should have a good view of most of the action. Work should start on 7/5 about 12z on replacin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00001.html (7,539 bytes)

239. [TowerTalk] tower party live webcast... (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 21:44:28 -0000
Well, I hope you were watching early... we started promptly at 12z, took down the telrex with the broke boom and put up one of the new m2 ones at 90'. But the wind was too strong to do anything highe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00002.html (7,331 bytes)

240. [TowerTalk] RE: antenna party updates (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 17:08:10 -0000
Well, we are going to try again... Sunday morning starting about 8am we will try one more time to get the 6 ele 20m down and the last 2 new ones up. Please let me know if you plan on coming. If you c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00003.html (7,809 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu