Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k5jv@kingwoodcable.com: 84 ]

Total 84 documents matching your query.

41. [Amps] Measuring HV thread (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:40:36 -0500
Greetings to all, Those of you who went to Dayton probably saw the HI voltage voltmeter I had in my trailer. It came out of Peter Dahl's shop. It read in steps of 0 to 5,000, 25,000, and 50,000 volts
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00332.html (7,006 bytes)

42. [Amps] [Heathkit] The SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: "k5jv" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:13:18 -0500
Greetings to all, I usually do not comment on topics like this but could not resist this time. I, also, have been repairing amps for about 40 years -- have probably worked on 100 SB-220's. I think it
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00386.html (8,462 bytes)

43. [Amps] suppressor material (score: 1)
Author: "k5jv" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:32:58 -0500
Greetings to all, Yes, I agree that there are better materials available for making parasitic suppressors -- stainless steel is just one good example. But, have you ever tried to fabricate a PRACTICA
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00392.html (8,073 bytes)

44. [Amps] one mor SB-220 fix (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:40:12 -0500
Greetings to all, There is one other fix that should be really considered on the SB-220 that does not get much mention. The recent thread should be taken seriously. The subject is the RF choke across
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00394.html (8,245 bytes)

45. [Amps] Design VS parasitic (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:28:50 -0500
Greetings to all, A couple of comments to my last post have prompted another reply. The question must be asked, "What causes a parasitic oscillation, in the first place?" The very basic answer is "st
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00406.html (9,212 bytes)

46. Re: [Amps] one mor SB-220 fix (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:55:34 -0500
Gary, What you say about the RF choke reducing arcing is correct, but this is just one of its several functions. Your point about C1 arcing is a valid point. But, what if, as you say, it was set near
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00407.html (7,953 bytes)

47. Re: [Amps] [HeathKit] The SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:08:29 -0500
Dick, I would like to have a copy of this service bulletin also. The only one I have heard of dealt with fusing the, otherwise unprotected, filament transformer primary. Of course, this change should
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00413.html (10,200 bytes)

48. [Amps] SB-220 mod (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:21:10 -0500
Greetings to all, I found this HeathKit Service Bulletin. If this is the bulletin Carl mentioned, it does apply to the filament transformer, but has absolutely nothing to do with what we were discuss
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00416.html (8,324 bytes)

49. [Amps] SB-220 filament transformer failure (score: 1)
Author: "k5jv" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:35:33 -0500
Greetings to all, Just had another SB-220 come in with a dead filament transformer. Someone had replaced the original transformer, that had also failed, with a brand new, expensive, Peter Dahl transf
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00543.html (7,528 bytes)

50. [Amps] SB220 bias thread (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:36:35 -0500
Greetings to all, An interesting thread. If you use a trapezoid display to tune your linear amp, you will quickly see all the differences in tuning that are being mentioned. The most obvious conclusi
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00631.html (8,018 bytes)

51. [Amps] 8874 pulls (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:43:58 -0500
Greetings to all, I have two sets (total of four) 8874's pulled from working Alpha amps that were converted to 3CX800's. These are probably the last 8874 pulls that I will have as I will no longer ma
/archives//html/Amps/2009-09/msg00257.html (6,813 bytes)

52. Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 07:31:05 -0500
Greetings to all, "Required age to attain geezer status" Wow! That sounds like Mark Twain's "Threshold of age." 73 de Lon, K5JV 1110 Golden Bear Ln. Kingwood, TX 77339 281-358-4207 281-358-4234 FAX 2
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00127.html (9,388 bytes)

53. [Amps] 4CX-1000/1500 in Collins 30S-1 (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:43:30 -0500
Greetings to all, The real important difference between the 1000 an the 1500 (other than price) is the grid dissipation rating. The 4CX-1000 has something like .1 watt grid dissipation rating while t
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00280.html (6,853 bytes)

54. [Amps] {Collins} 30S-1 (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:07:01 -0500
Greetings to all, There is some misinformation being passed out here about these tubes. There are two common 4CX1,500 tube types, the "A", and the "B". The "A" tube has a 25 watt grid dissipation rat
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00282.html (8,115 bytes)

55. Re: [Amps] {Collins} 30S-1 (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:48:06 -0500
Bill, The "1000" refers to the 4CX1000A tube and the "1500" refers to the 4CX1,500B. Do not mix up the 4CX1,500A with this bunch. It is a very different tube, with a very different base, and requires
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00284.html (7,440 bytes)

56. [Amps] Choke from Warrior HA-10 amp (score: 1)
Author: "k5jv" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:23:19 -0500
Greetings to all, I am in search for a power supply choke from a Heathkit Warrior, HA-10, amp. Cash or trade. 73 de Lon, K5JV 281-358-4207 281-795-1335 Cell __________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00285.html (6,512 bytes)

57. [Amps] Wanted Collins 30L-1 relay (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:18:37 -0600
Greetings to all, I need an antenna relay for a Collins 30L-1, original or after market, as long as it will fit. 73 de Lon, K5JV 1110 Golden Bear Ln. Kingwood, TX 77339 281-358-4207 281-358-4234 FAX
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00117.html (6,461 bytes)

58. [Amps] QSK switching time (score: 1)
Author: "k5jv" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:56:22 -0600
Greetings to all, I would like to share a great discussion that I was evolved in this morning on an 80 meter net about QSK, with some of my own comments. The basic argument is that because PIN diodes
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00440.html (9,318 bytes)

59. [Amps] Response the "QSK switching time" (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:53:26 -0600
Greetings to all, I started responding to each reply off line. I am getting so many responses, and most are similar, so I am responding through the reflector. The idea of increased IMD is something I
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00460.html (8,457 bytes)

60. [Amps] QSK-1500 chip (score: 1)
Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 14:59:05 -0500
Greetings to all, I have located a source for the, hard to find, Motorola MC14011BCP chips. The only problem is that I must order 25 of them to get the price anywhere with reason. Does anyone have an
/archives//html/Amps/2010-07/msg00072.html (6,938 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu