Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k6uj@pacbell.net: 619 ]

Total 619 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [TowerTalk] Radial Question (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 17:18:09 -0800
thanks Jim, I am going to measure the current in each of my 4 elevated radials and see where I stand. Bob K6UJ 73, Jim K9YC On Sat,2/27/2016 11:43 AM, Robert Harmon wrote: I use four elevated radials
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00328.html (11,490 bytes)

282. Re: [TowerTalk] Protecting Aluminum Antennas (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 10:40:21 -0700
Jim, That GE stuff sounds great. I would also like to find out if is still available. I am putting up a new yagi soon and would like to try it. 73, Bob K6UJ I'm not advocating anodizing antenna eleme
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00361.html (11,130 bytes)

283. Re: [TowerTalk] Protecting Aluminum Antennas (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:31:16 -0700
I like the idea of spraying on a protective coating. Glyptal clear insulating varnish spray was suggested earlier and was reported to last quite a few years when sprayed on aluminum antennas. I have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00394.html (10,734 bytes)

284. Re: [TowerTalk] Protecting Aluminum Antennas (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:36:09 -0700
Gary, Thanks for sharing the info on coatings ! I have been trying to find something suitable. Bob K6UJ On 3/21/16 10:22 AM, Gary Johnson wrote: An effective clear anti-corrosion coating for aluminum
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00396.html (11,186 bytes)

285. Re: [TowerTalk] SO-239 with longer reach? (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 19:29:05 -0700
I'll chime in. Like John, I would give priority to having a quality Amphenol SO-239. Bob K6UJ On 3/24/16 7:21 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote: Many companies install them on the outside of the enclosure if t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00418.html (8,753 bytes)

286. [TowerTalk] remote ant switch decision (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:56:48 -0700
I am considering getting either the Array Solutions RatPak or a DX Engineering remote antenna switch. Any feedback on either of these, positive or negative ? thanks, Bob K6UJ ________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00142.html (6,514 bytes)

287. Re: [TowerTalk] remote ant switch decision (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:31:52 -0700
Jim, Thanks for the info. I will check out the 4O3A. I have never used a remote switch before and wanted to get the most reliable unit I could find. 73, Bob K6UJ On 4/12/16 9:26 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00149.html (9,729 bytes)

288. Re: [TowerTalk] remote ant switch decision (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:45:39 -0700
thanks Joe, Bob K6UJ Stick with the switch that uses enclosed relays with higher impedance coils. The "open frame" relays (even with a carbonate cover) with low impedance coils (higher current) are m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00150.html (9,167 bytes)

289. Re: [TowerTalk] frustrating rain and connections... update (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 21:09:22 -0700
I have always noticed a slight change in the swr with hf yagis when it is raining. Just a minimal change though. Nothing like what Gary, K9RX reported. Bob K6UJ 73 ES DX, Gary - AB9M Ive had beams si
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00167.html (13,364 bytes)

290. Re: [TowerTalk] Ameritron remote coax switch ? (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:14:04 -0700
Jim, Would it be possible to replace the relays in the RCS-4 with vacuum relays ? Probably not enough room ? Bob K6UJ I have three RCS-4. Thru the coax switching, never a failure in 4 yrs with legal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00240.html (9,506 bytes)

291. Re: [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:54:24 -0700
Jim, Very well built. I am curious about one thing. Their write up states that this unit uses 4 cascaded ferrite cores. In the picture I can only see 2. Thanks for sharing ! Bob K6UJ On 4/19/16 3:30
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00261.html (8,177 bytes)

292. Re: [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:22:52 -0700
Chuck, I emailed MyAntennas this morning and they got right back to me. You are right, there are two stacks of two. Bob K6UJ Chuck W5PR Jim, Very well built. I am curious about one thing. Their write
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00266.html (10,475 bytes)

293. Re: [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:27:23 -0700
Jim, I am using your choke design on both of my beams. With all this discussion on chokes it got me to thinking. My tower is only 10 feet away from the back of the house. I'm not sure how much noise
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00277.html (10,164 bytes)

294. [TowerTalk] need some LMR-600 ? (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:11:08 -0700
I have a 300 foot spool of Times Microwave LMR-600, still in its ship wrapping. Also have 10, Times Microwave EZ 600 NMH D fittings, still in unopened packages. Will sell for all $425.00 plus $40.00
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00283.html (8,141 bytes)

295. [TowerTalk] LMR-600 (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:09:57 -0700
The LMR-600 cable and fittings I posted earlier for sale has now been sold. 73, Bob K6UJ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mail
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00287.html (8,003 bytes)

296. [TowerTalk] Common Mode Interference (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:54:30 -0700
I am still learning how to deal with common mode interference, and I am still very much a work in progress :-) Below are two sites with info on this subject that some of you may not be aware of. Firs
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00289.html (9,025 bytes)

297. [TowerTalk] Why no cable mount female UHF fittings ? (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:28:16 -0700
Why is it that I can get both male and female N connectors to go on the end of coax but only male UHF connectors (PL-259) for mounting on coax ? Bob K6UJ _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00313.html (8,063 bytes)

298. Re: [TowerTalk] Why no cable mount female UHF fittings ? (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:45:48 -0700
Thanks to everyone for informing me of suppliers of these fittings, much appreciated ! I didn't think they were available and the only option was to use barrel connectors. I need to wake up and smell
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00329.html (7,549 bytes)

299. Re: [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:24:46 -0700
I agree with Tod. 73, Bob K6UJ There is indeed an RFI reflector. But, few if any, TowerTalk guys are on it. Admittedly this thread does not help guys assemble, purchase,design or install towers. It d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00354.html (9,757 bytes)

300. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Lifting a mast off the rotator (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:58:08 -0700
Grant, Thanks for the video on Nord-Lock. I am impressed with the product. I was surprised that the lock nut option didn't secure better in the tests. I always thought this was the most secure method
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00402.html (13,254 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu