At 02:13 AM 9/10/03 +0000, VR2BrettGraham wrote: Anybody know if K9TM can deal with logs that we force our logging programs to spit out in Cabrillo, even if those logging programs don't understand Ca
The MiQP Committee is pleased to announce that the results from the 2003 Michigan QSO Party are now available on the MiQP web page http://www.miqp.org. The 2003 MiQP was a record setter in a number o
Jack, I've not looked at the CQWW rules specifically, but the ARRL makes it clear that multi-2 entries must clearly indicate in the Cabrillo log which transmitter makes the QSO. The computer number,
At 05:33 PM 10/20/03 -0400, Jim White, K4OJ wrote: Someone has an Ekletech remote knob they are using with a TS950, does anyone know if that will work with a TS940 or is it a different model that is
At 07:36 AM 11/19/03 -0800, Leigh S. Jones wrote: What I found, before I won the phone SS about 3 decades at W6HX where I opped SSB SS was that the most effective method was to transmit MY exchange s
Byterunner 4 com port ISA Board, uses one shared IRQ. Not in CT it won't. CT still requires unique IRQ's. I was going to make this comment, but Bob took care of it. We ran into this with our recent C
Thanks to K2KW for clarifying this point. What Ken and some of the other DX entries in the ARRL 160M contest are asking for is simple recognition of their efforts. DX entries *are* legit - they're in
I'm part of the team that does the logchecking for the ARRL 10M contest, so let me clarify the situation with Ken's log, and also answer N4GN's question. First, for the ARRL 10M contest we expect the
At 05:44 AM 12/16/03 +0000, Rex Maner wrote: I logged 4 Q's with WA. stations on SSB but only desire a CW Only entry. Should I leave them in the Log with a note, or remove them and send a second log
This coming weekend is the Michigan QSO Party, sponsored by the Mad River Radio Club. Complete rules can be found on the MRRC web site http://www.mrrc.net, but here are the basics: Begins: 1600 UTC -
One last reminder the 2002 Michigan QSO Party is this weekend, running from 16Z on Saturday to 04Z Sunday. Full rules are available on the MRRC web site at http://www.mrrc.net. A big part of the acti
Dave, I just sold my old FT-726R (50/144/432) at Dayton and bought a new FT-847. My objective was to get a more modern VHF radio, more power, with possibly some satellite work. The HF capability was
Please let me know if you lost any QSOs from K8CC. For the past several years I've reminded our operators before the contest that if they send someone an exchange, they are to log it, period. Hurting
I have to agree wholeheartedly with Dave. When the high and low band categories were created for the ARRL DX Contest in the middle seventies, it seemed to me like a great idea. To paraphrase Dave's p
Dick, Thanks for sharing your observations on your 40M four-square vs. a 40-2CD. My only caveat is to keep in mind that the comparison you make during the summer will not always jibe with the same co
Back in the early seventies when I was a new ham (licensed 2-3 years) and starting to get very enthused about contesting, the QST contest writeups were a HUGE factor in increasing my knowledge. I was
Speaking as another logchecker, I agree totally with the comments made by K4JRB. If we are going to have fifteen day log deadlines and thirty days for results, then we're going to have to live with t
Bill, I gotta commend you on your efforts to raise teams for the NAQPs. It sounds like you're having a lot of success and it should be a lot of fun. You mention W8LNO's 'Midwest Popguns'. Joe was a l
Speaking for the ARRL 160/10 logchecking team, we use the Cabrillo Claimed Score field an a sanity check on the score our logchecking process generates. Anything more than about a 25% difference gene