Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kd4d@comcast.net: 252 ]

Total 252 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspotting, and its impact (score: 1)
Author: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:53:51 +0000 (UTC)
Good day, Kelly and everyone: I am concerned about the potential effect of a suggestion "to request the DX Cluster operators to kindly employ WRTC filters" on the vast majority of participants in the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00262.html (11,150 bytes)

142. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1)
Author: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:36:50 +0000 (UTC)
Hi David: I'm one of those users - I connect to your skimmer and several others. The RBN is a single point of failure. Legislating its use is just like dictating that I can only use one specific pack
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00408.html (10,590 bytes)

143. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:15:28 -0500
That's inventive but I don't think it's what the words say. :-) If that's really what Bob meant, he or someone official needs to say so. 73, Mark 73, Mark "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM> wrote: -- Sent
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00450.html (14,767 bytes)

144. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:08:00 -0500
Hi Pete; The most important thing in the CQ is your call. I think you should send it twice. I don't think you should send test twice and CQ TEST is redundant! :-) I also don't think the S&P station n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00011.html (9,940 bytes)

145. [CQ-Contest] CQ Scottsdale, AZ (score: 1)
Author: "mebly5343@gmail.com" <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:26:30 -0400
Good day: I will be in Scottsdale, AZ, on business this week. Any local contesters want to get together Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday night? Let me know. I look forward to meeting you! 73, Mark, KD
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00139.html (8,073 bytes)

146. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheerleading (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:12:36 -0500
Hi Barry: This is certainly not the case in a WPX contest (or even a CQWW) where a LOT of new callsigns show up. This would make the RBN feed MUCH less useful for many, many users. Maybe some flag co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00136.html (10,031 bytes)

147. Re: [CQ-Contest] BOGUS QSO RATES! (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:15:12 -0500
Hi Jeff: QRZ takes way too long to send or say IMHO. Try "Thanks" (or TU on CW) and, maybe "Roger" (R on CW)if you want a different acknowledgement when you don't send the call. You can say many call
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00171.html (15,256 bytes)

148. Re: [CQ-Contest] Opinion: SO-unassisted should not be using CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:31:35 -0500
Hi Dave: Yes. Some contests, including WAE, don't have "unassisted" categories. There are people advocating the elimination of "unassisted" categories in the other contests. 73, Mark, KD4D __________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00505.html (10,048 bytes)

149. Re: [CQ-Contest] Opinion: SO-unassisted should not be using CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:05:48 -0500
Hi Tor: I, for one, don't agree - I see little difference between "local" skimmers and the worldwide network. To the operator, they look the same during a contest. 73, Mark, KD4D ____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00526.html (9,539 bytes)

150. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network - After-Action Report (score: 1)
Author: "mebly5343@gmail.com" <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 11:04:01 -0500
Hi Barry: These filtering options need to be done for the individual RBN spot users, not the raw RBN feed. VE7CC or the AR-Cluster needs to implement these as filters that can be selected by the indi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00032.html (14,054 bytes)

151. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer had finally arrived (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:30:39 -0500
One very effective trick is to find the station that the DX stations is working and match that station's CW speed and frequency. :-) 73, Mark, KD4D _______________________________________________ CQ-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00206.html (13,927 bytes)

152. Re: [CQ-Contest] Isn't the contest over? (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:43:42 -0500
Good day, everyone: I think using this as an opportunity for education is the correct approach. If this is a new contester or a casual participant, he or she may be completely unaware of the issue. L
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00221.html (10,010 bytes)

153. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:09:04 -0400
Good day, everyone: I also strongly agree that the distinction between Single Operator and Single Operator Assisted should be maintained. SO and SO Assisted are NOT the same and arguments that cheati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00176.html (9,094 bytes)

154. Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted (score: 1)
Author: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 23:40:56 +0000 (UTC)
HI Randy: I didn't see this until now - I was tuning around on 160 meters this weekend. and single operator assisted categories. I am very familiar with assistance and skimmers/RBN and use them in WA
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00265.html (14,986 bytes)

155. Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted (score: 1)
Author: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:51:53 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Jim: K5ZD, PY5EG, and LU5DX, among many others, ARE saying "get rid of assisted categories." To quote their recent e-mails: K5ZD: >> For these contests where there is no assisted category, instead
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00278.html (10,161 bytes)

156. Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted (score: 1)
Author: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:00:29 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Joe and Everyone: I do not believe that contests that currently consider operators using assistance as multi-operators should modify their existing categories to create a "combined" single operato
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00320.html (11,872 bytes)

157. Re: [CQ-Contest] Crowne Plaza 2014 (score: 1)
Author: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 19:24:14 +0000 (UTC)
I asked at the desk when I checked out whether they were doing something like the reservation system they did last year and was told "No." FWIW... 73, Mark, KD4D I got an offer under my door during t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00287.html (9,748 bytes)

158. Re: [CQ-Contest] Crowne Plaza 2014 (score: 1)
Author: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 19:16:39 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Stewart: I also don't rent a car. There is a bus terminal half a block from the Crowne Plaza with a bus that stops RIGHT in front of the Hara Arena. I discovered this when my "driver" wanted to le
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00321.html (9,981 bytes)

159. Re: [CQ-Contest] Crowne Plaza 2014 (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 18:30:49 -0400
The hotel shuttle is free... :-) 73, Mark Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone -- Original message -- From: w5gn@mxg.com Date: 5/28/2013 6:06 PM (GMT-05:00) To: 'Neal Campbell' <nealk3nc@g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00326.html (11,927 bytes)

160. Re: [CQ-Contest] [FCG] CQ WW Rules and SCP (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:06:36 -0400
In CQWW, whether you can change the call depends on whether you sent the other station's callsign - basically whether you were running. See XII 2)  That implied you can't correct an exchange error, b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00196.html (12,315 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu