Mail Archive Search: <+from:km1h@jeremy.mv.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:km1h@jeremy.mv.com: 3440 ]

Total 3440 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Amps] Transformer question (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 19:51:29 -0400; So then you are trying to convince us that anyone who has a 240V dryer, range, AC, Air Compressor or similar device with the neutral tied to the ground at the wall outlet and at the device has a safe; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00094.html (10,636 bytes)
42. Re: [Amps] GI7b and GI7bt FS (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 09:08:24 -0400; If you are already being offered tubes at a good price why push the issue. Maybe he felt insulted by you and in that case he was justified in his reply. In fact you havent mentioned what you mean by; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00110.html (9,568 bytes)
43. Re: [Amps] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 09:20:30 -0400; That so called safety bar has been the cause of many SB220 failures. That short often takes out the zener ZD1, R-3 and the PS diodes. Ive also seen the gid chokes RFC-4 and RFC-5 open. The first thin; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00111.html (8,316 bytes)
44. Re: [Amps] GI7b and GI7bt FS (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:05:34 -0400; Thanks for the clarification Kees. Carl KM1H OM Carl Shouting at a person while just asking, and nothing more, some questions if my e-mails and Skype messages were received, is what I considder very; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00115.html (11,590 bytes)
45. Re: [Amps] Transformer question (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:01:12 -0400; Thanks Gary, that explains a lot of the confusion I had. I built this house in 89 and the NEC in force was the 1987 version. That clearly showed the neutral and ground tied together. I also checked m; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00154.html (14,360 bytes)
46. Re: [Amps] Transformer question (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:07:59 -0400; I preserved the knob and tube (non functional) in the basement of the original part of my present home; that section was built in 1836. I dont even know the name of some of the stuff I pulled out of; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00155.html (19,012 bytes)
47. Re: [Amps] Fwd: Weighing In On Solder Water Wash Flux (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:41:53 -0400; I worked in microwave R&D from 1997 to 2003 when I retired.from industry. Never saw water flux at any of those companies. I still have a little plastic bottle with a hollow SS tip that holds the liqu; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00196.html (12,148 bytes)
48. Re: [Amps] suppressors (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:49:14 -0400; However there are instances, for whatever reason, that a resistive material solves the problem. National Radio discovered this in the early 60's when building a Jeep mounted 4CX1500A HF xcvr for the; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00210.html (7,927 bytes)
49. Re: [Amps] SELL: Johnson Bros Verniers (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:13:16 -0400; No such thing as Johnson Brothers. Its Jackson Brothers. Its strange that I only see that poster selling things from his business and never (never that Ive noticed anyway) contributing to forum discu; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00227.html (8,469 bytes)
50. Re: [Amps] SELL: Johnson Bros Verniers (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:10:04 -0400; I dont doubt the stuff is good. My question is about never contributing to discussions and just selling. Is it OK with the moderator?? I dont want to start listing 6M conversions and the like if Im g; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00232.html (10,830 bytes)
51. Re: [Amps] AL-811H conversion ? (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:38:08 -0400; The 811 works fine on 6M but 4 of them have way too much output C to be able to construct a convential tank circuit. I dont know the HV available in that amp but if its 1500-1700 you can easily use a; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00245.html (8,166 bytes)
52. Re: [Amps] high current switching supply (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:39:36 -0400; We had 4 of those to run the burn-in racks for microwave modules at a company I worked for. They replaced linear supplies which were mighty old and on their last legs. No problems running 24/7 in the; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00250.html (7,970 bytes)
53. Re: [Amps] Grid Dipping the Pi network in a new amp? (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:37:38 -0400; Sounds like youre working on collision avoidance? I did some prototype work for Benz in 1998. Going from 38 GHz where I had been working to 75 GHz was a big jump in technology and component selection; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00262.html (9,025 bytes)
54. Re: [Amps] ALPHAs and momentary power outages (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:44:15 -0400; A couple of 1000-1500W inverters and a big deep cycle battery ought to handle the load for a short time. The trick would be the transfer switching as well as configuring the two 120V outputs for 240V; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00272.html (10,652 bytes)
55. Re: [Amps] Decent AL-811H schematic ? (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:08:35 -0400; Ameritron has all schematics on line. The ones Ive seen are OK. CArl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/lis; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00285.html (7,833 bytes)
56. Re: [Amps] Decent AL-811H schematic ? (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:14:16 -0400; If it was a "real" amp I'd agree with you!! I couldnt resist. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00289.html (8,635 bytes)
57. Re: [Amps] SB-200 DATA (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:48:09 -0400; The 811A is decsended from the pre war 811 and the much earlier 211 with most internal problems still intact. However the USA tube is factory rated to 54 or 60 MHz depending on the manufacturer and w; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00308.html (12,809 bytes)
58. Re: [Amps] SB-200 DATA (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:00:55 -0400; All the published articles Ive read are pure garbage, or worse than Edisonian as Tom might say. I get LOTS of SB-200 and 220's in here from guys who have tried to follow those articles as well as som; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00310.html (8,764 bytes)
59. Re: [Amps] SB-200 DATA (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:48:34 -0400; The point that I have been proving for almost 40 years is that the SB-200 is an excellent candidate for 6M. Dollars per watt it is the best deal around and a preferred choice by many who do not want; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00314.html (9,840 bytes)
60. Re: [Amps] SB-200 DATA (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:32:55 -0400; -- Original Message -- > That's the same way I look at SB-200's. It's a shriveled up dried out The above comment makes absolutely no sense. I think someone got dropped on his head too many times as a; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00324.html (8,275 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]