Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kr2q@optimum.net: 353 ]

Total 353 documents matching your query.

81. [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22 (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:24:24 +0000 (GMT)
Ladies and Gentlemen, RE: setting up remote stations to work "only our club members" The current rules advise that UNSPORTSMAN-LIKE BEHAVIOR will subject the entrant to DQ. I'll go out on a limb here
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00182.html (6,654 bytes)

82. [CQ-Contest] Xtreme Category: the sky is NOT falling (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:56:02 +0000 (GMT)
Maybe follks just to debate this stuff. Contesting, DXCC, whatever, is based on the presumption of entrant/applicant honesty. Are there cheaters? Sure. There has always been cheaters. If someone fake
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00219.html (8,751 bytes)

83. [CQ-Contest] 59(9) all the time! (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:57:53 +0000 (GMT)
He asked for FCC action? This gets filed under GET A LIFE. tnx for sharing....it only confirms that "they are still out there." Doug KR2Q _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00365.html (7,223 bytes)

84. [CQ-Contest] what procedure to do for M/S violations (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:58:54 +0000 (GMT)
On 6400 qsos we had 12qsos under violation What procedure should we do if during a 48h contest we make some mistakes In waiting 10min? 73 Dave 9A1UN This is fair and honest question. THE ANSWER: 1. Y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00225.html (7,065 bytes)

85. [CQ-Contest] No Self Spotting - history (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:13:01 +0000 (GMT)
Personal opinion follows: As I recall, the "no self spotting" rule was established because it was deemed to be another method of simply calling CQ. As others have pointed out, you (emphasis on YOU, t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00275.html (8,139 bytes)

86. [CQ-Contest] Casual Contesters (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 10:52:25 +0000 (GMT)
I shared this link 11 days ago on a different reflector. I set a trigger point to see if I would post it here or not. I just received the last "needed" comment, so here it is. http://video.nytimes.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00000.html (6,350 bytes)

87. [CQ-Contest] cheating and ways to improve (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:27:15 +0000 (GMT)
It is not just contesting.....and very from just the USA. de Doug KR2Q A Nation of Cheaters By Kirk O. Hanson January 19, 2003 Cheating. What could be more American? From the snake oil salesmen of th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00214.html (14,117 bytes)

88. [CQ-Contest] the growth of cheating (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:37:05 +0000 (GMT)
FYI... de Doug KR2Q The New York Times The dark side I Why do people cheat? By Drake Bennett Published: Thursday, October 4, 2007 These are tough times for fair play. Any sports fan could reel off a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00215.html (13,827 bytes)

89. [CQ-Contest] 2008 RDXC certificate arrives! (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:50:07 +0000 (GMT)
Yippie! Didn't expect this...continental winner (qrp, naturally). very nice award and MNI THANKS RDXC! de Doug KR2Q _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00280.html (6,388 bytes)

90. [CQ-Contest] on-site inspection (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:28:34 +0000 (GMT)
I believe I already posted this, but now seems like the right time to post it again. http://video.nytimes.com/video/2009/07/19/sports/1247463519048/the-10-000-commandments.html?emc=eta1 The link is "
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00295.html (6,866 bytes)

91. Re: [CQ-Contest] K4RO on cheating (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:07:29 +0000 (GMT)
There have been several really good posts on cheating, and this one by K4RO is one the best. Here is a great excerpt: [snip] The truth is that cheaters will continue to find new ways to cheat, but we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00301.html (7,623 bytes)

92. [CQ-Contest] WPX new log handling procedure - I agree! (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:46:43 +0000 (GMT)
Interesting comments in K5ZD's WPX blog. This sounds reasonable to me. http://www.cqwpx.com/blog/ Here is a small excerpt: We have decided that for any single operator log where all QSOs are made on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00357.html (7,167 bytes)

93. [CQ-Contest] EI3JE on M/S contesting (was Log Analysis) (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:30:21 +0000 (GMT)
EI3JE said: [snip] i.e if you had 5 stations in the shack one on each band what's to stop you having an op on every band looking for mults and then deciding which op is going to get the "10 minute" s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00390.html (7,474 bytes)

94. [CQ-Contest] Where can I find a contest calendar? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:41:19 +0000 (GMT)
For years, I postrf a "personal" Contest Calendar in the kitchen so everybody knows which ones I have planned. And every year, I have to put it together manually, looking up (projecting) the correct
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00077.html (7,070 bytes)

95. [CQ-Contest] Contest Calendar resolved! (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:31:18 +0000 (GMT)
Thanks to everyone who responded (mostly direct). I never noticed the "Perpetual Calendar" before. What can I say. :-) For those who also didn't know about it (lots), use this: http://www.hornucopia.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00083.html (6,890 bytes)

96. [CQ-Contest] Hal FYO iambic paddle - I have the last one? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:32:51 +0000 (GMT)
Nice photos, etc. When I bought mine, also directly from HAL, I was told, more or less, "You're lucky you called. We have one left." Mine is SN 395 and when it arrived, it also came a generous quanti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00233.html (6,746 bytes)

97. [CQ-Contest] "I would like to see more DQs...." (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:49:42 +0000 (GMT)
Well, I suppose that things have changed a lot since then. Most Uniques are actually Busted or Bad calls (no, not all, but most). Thanks to automated cross-checking, this is now easy to do. Busted/Ba
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00040.html (7,761 bytes)

98. [CQ-Contest] Single Op + Pit Crew (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:35:39 +0000 (GMT)
Yes, an old topic. And I think that the SUBJECT for my email is actually stolen from N2NT (who coined the phrase many years ago), but maybe I giving incorrect attribution to Andy. Corrections welcome
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00055.html (8,175 bytes)

99. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Observer Program (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:48:04 +0000 (GMT)
NOTE: This is my opinion as an individual contester, nothing more. While some may view the Observer Program as a way to, shall we say, encourage honesty, I view it more as a way for guys (who I alrea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00180.html (6,797 bytes)

100. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Rules Question (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:24:17 +0000 (GMT)
Q:I have a question regarding operators in the CQ WW contests. Is there any rule that prohibits an operator from operating at a Multi Op station and also at his own station with his own call? A: Ther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00225.html (6,542 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu