Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kzerohb@gmail.com: 927 ]

Total 927 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Winning Edge (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:22:59 -0600
Irony defined. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00309.html (7,551 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Newbie CW logging questions (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:34:09 -0600
Zealots? I think a contest is intended as a test of radio skills including accurate copying. If you don't log what is sent, that seems something to "fret long over". 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 ___________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00340.html (8,211 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW Percentage (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:22:08 -0600
My hit rate is around 23% (10413/44904). _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00427.html (8,828 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW Percentage (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:30:53 -0600
I haven't done a "year-by-year" sort, but I suspect a graph plot would resemble a hockey stick favoring the recent. 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00449.html (9,655 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:02:53 -0600
David, Thanks for speaking out. We need some credible spokesmen for the minority positions. 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00452.html (9,565 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] Putting the spoon into the pot: WPX - who is onfirst? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:12:34 -0600
If you win, you won. If you didn't win, you shouldn't get left-over plaques from those who "already got another one". 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00012.html (13,235 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Plaques - Who should win them? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 23:39:53 -0600
Since the Steelers won the Super Bowl, should they give their AFC Trophy and Division pennant to the second place teams? Gimme a break! If you win, you get the hardware and walnut. Second place is Fi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00066.html (12,828 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:46:51 -0600
FCC rules do not give "exclusive right" to a beacon QRG, but they do give "automatic control" privileges on some band segments. (See 97.203 excerpt below) 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 97.203 Beacon statio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00112.html (9,665 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:39:28 -0500
And after you cipher out that number, what are the odds that someone with the same "lass too" would ask the question! (Hi, Tom) 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 _______________________________________________ C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00222.html (9,444 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:47:32 -0500
Dave's reports are an excellent tool and should be provided to the contest sponsor, who should act on them ruthlessly. But I enthusiastically agree that "public broadcast" is distasteful and mean sp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00223.html (9,817 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Examination of K1TTT's Reports (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:51:47 -0500
OO's don't issue public reports. They issue private notices. In extreme cases they involve the regulators. I think everyone (or at least most of us) think that K1TTT's investigations would be useful
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00281.html (8,254 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] Do all contest participants need to follow the rules? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:43:59 -0500
Good point, and I admit that I didn't recognize that distinction. But I think the answer is still the same. A non-entrant is not bound by the rules of the contest. For example, I think it would be gr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00285.html (9,377 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX rules from the past (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:50:58 -0500
You can operate for a total of 36 hours. Until you start operating, by definition you haven't taken any time off. "Time off" occurs >>>between<<< periods of operating, not before or after you quit op
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00339.html (7,579 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX rules from the past (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:16:19 -0500
"Everything not specifically prohibited is mandatory." [grinnin', duckin', and runnin'] 73, de Hans, K0HB "I participated in the contest by taking 48 hours of off time." ____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00357.html (7,831 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX rules from the past (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:29:23 -0500
Randy -- Please provide a one-word answer to the following. If I start operating at 1130Z, operate continuously for 36 hours, and stop at 2330Z, will all 36 hours be scored? ____ Yes ____ No 73, de H
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00358.html (10,003 bytes)

76. Re: [CQ-Contest] Just dreaming (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:36:42 -0500
In other words, just like NAQP except you could work some DX for mults. Not a very appealing format. 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00430.html (8,986 bytes)

77. Re: [CQ-Contest] Time for a Contesting Wikipedia? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:11:22 -0500
I think an "independent" knowledge base like that would be a wonderful resource, but a very ambitious project to build, and would require a significant ongoing "maintenance" effort to remain current.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00574.html (9,173 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2009 PAQSO Party Announcements (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:08:23 -0500
Old score: PA Stations worked = 5 Mults worked = 2 Score (5 x 2) = 10 New score: PA Stations not worked = 7460 (-) Mults not worked = 85 (-) Score (-7460 x -85) = 634,100 ___________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00012.html (7,833 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:58:54 -0500
Despite all claims, I have to suspect that the "integrity" issue is wildly overblown, but it gives something salacious for people to gossip about when the sunspots are in short supply. 73, de Hans,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00043.html (8,277 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:49:38 -0500
Tom, Each station is responsible for keeping their own operation completely legal, and we have to assume that the other stations we work are doing the same thing. Further, we must assume that the co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00049.html (9,575 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu