Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: (John Lane)
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 13:10:01 -0000
The shift control should provide the same passband carrier point regardless of the filter used although occasionally I need to adjust it slightly when going from 250Hz to 500Hz when using RTTY. It sh
/archives//html/Yaesu/1999-01/msg00002.html (11,039 bytes)

2. [Yaesu] Building a CAT interface (score: 1)
Author: (John Lane)
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 11:53:13 -0000
The 757 needs TTL logic level inputs for it's CATt interface. I built an interface using the Maxim MAX232 chip. A very simple arrangement. I believe there was an article in QST a few years back or yo
/archives//html/Yaesu/1999-01/msg00056.html (7,502 bytes)

3. [Yaesu] FT920 output (score: 1)
Author: (John Lane)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 12:26:04 -0000
A properly adjusted SSB transmitter will only showabout 30 to 50% of CW output on voice peaks (using an average reading watt meter such as a Bird 43) and perhaps a little more when speech processing
/archives//html/Yaesu/1998-12/msg00068.html (9,974 bytes)

4. [Yaesu] FT920 vs 870S vs Omni 6+ (score: 1)
Author: (John Lane)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 07:47:40 -0400
Personally I wouldn't consider the radios you mention to be an upgrade to the FT-920. They are really in the same class. For something better I would suggest the FT-1000MP/D, TS-950SDX , IC-775 or so
/archives//html/Yaesu/1998-07/msg00050.html (8,578 bytes)

5. [Yaesu] FT920 vs 870S vs Omni 6+ (score: 1)
Author: (John Lane)
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 09:05:03 -0400
If it were me I'd buy the Yaesu. Yaesu service and support is superior to Icom and I've had many problems with Icom radios in the past. My experience with the IC-211 would be enough to swear off Icom
/archives//html/Yaesu/1998-07/msg00058.html (7,744 bytes)

6. [Yaesu] Ft 920 Power Out (score: 1)
Author: (John Lane)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 20:24:27 -0400
I'm not sure he has a problem. +/- 15 watts at 100 watts measured is within the accuracy of many watt meters. The Bird 43 is rated at +/- 5% FS on a good day. Who knows about the internal metering in
/archives//html/Yaesu/1998-04/msg00045.html (7,525 bytes)

7. [Yaesu] Cleaning sealed control Kenpro control pots. (score: 1)
Author: (John Lane)
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 17:33:12 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_001D_01BD1B92.53E16EE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cramolin R/Deoxit clean
/archives//html/Yaesu/1998-01/msg00030.html (9,480 bytes)

8. [Yaesu] ft-1000d question (score: 1)
Author: (John Lane)
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 22:18:03 -0500
Not possible on the FT-1000. W8KX -- FAQ on WWW: Submissions: Administrative requests: Problems: owner-yaesu@conte
/archives//html/Yaesu/1998-01/msg00105.html (6,892 bytes)

9. [Yaesu] FT50 & battery drainage (score: 1)
Author: (John Lane)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 10:24:43 -0500
I haven't had this problem with the FT-50 or the FT-470. I have had a set of alkaline batteries in my FT-50 for the past 6 months with intermittent use and they are still good. It should be generally
/archives//html/Yaesu/1997-12/msg00112.html (9,587 bytes)

10. [Yaesu] opinion about FT-890 ? (score: 1)
Author: (John Lane)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 1997 19:41:10 -0000
I had an FT-890 for a short while. Basically a good radio, better than an FT-747/757/840 not quite as good as an FT-920 or FT-1000 (receiver wise). Stock SSB filter is wimpy and the upgrade is expens
/archives//html/Yaesu/1997-11/msg00105.html (8,138 bytes)

11. [Yaesu] FT-990/-1000D/MP Thoughts? (score: 1)
Author: (John Lane)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 20:24:10 -0400
My suggestion is to sell the FT-990. Several people I know who have owned them have had problems. I have an FT-1000 and love the radio but be advised that the Molex style connector which feeds Vcc to
/archives//html/Yaesu/1997-06/msg00009.html (9,235 bytes)

12. [Yaesu] Any Alternative to FIF-232C Interface? (score: 1)
Author: (John Lane)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 20:29:03 -0400
I vote for the Maxim 232 chip. I built one up in a little box and it works FB. The FT-1000 needs a 100K resistor to Vcc on the digital output to the 232 interface. W8KX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.qsl.
/archives//html/Yaesu/1997-06/msg00010.html (8,339 bytes)

13. [Yaesu] FT1000 & DSP2232 (score: 1)
Author: (John C. Lane)
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 10:00:58 +0100
I have a DSP-2232 interfaced to an FT-1000. The system works fine but you may have to adjust the FT-1000 internal level controls if your driving the DSP-2232 with AFSK. I believe mine had to be set a
/archives//html/Yaesu/1997-04/msg00001.html (7,921 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu