Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lists@subich.com: 246 ]

Total 246 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [Amps] Help with HL2200 6 meter conversion (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:14:08 -0500
Absolutely! The coil's field will induce current in any conductive surface it impacts. By moving the coil closer to the top cover you increase shunt capacitance across the coil effectively increasin
/archives//html/Amps/2011-01/msg00235.html (13,021 bytes)

82. Re: [Amps] Why no 28 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:48:59 -0500
Except for those amplifiers that use a microprocessor controller with frequency counter. The controller can be programmed to lockout when detecting RF between 26 and 28 MHz. If the amplifier is also
/archives//html/Amps/2011-01/msg00299.html (10,593 bytes)

83. Re: [Amps] GI-46B in TL-922 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:16:32 -0500
He may not have changed the heatsink. From documentation on the tube: What you describe a "the superior GI46 heatsink" is shown as "variant I." sounds like "variant II" is the more common. 73, ... J
/archives//html/Amps/2011-01/msg00320.html (10,167 bytes)

84. Re: [Amps] CODAR Technology Inc. (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:29:34 -0500
Alpha 76 data here: http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/alpha/76a/ 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
/archives//html/Amps/2011-01/msg00329.html (7,934 bytes)

85. Re: [Amps] OM3500A (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:53:37 -0500
I suspect one would be ahead to purchase the OM2500A since is has the same automatic controls and is better matched to US power limits. I think the issue is more that the US amplifier approval proce
/archives//html/Amps/2011-01/msg00354.html (12,989 bytes)

86. Re: [Amps] AL-811 & 572's (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:47:17 -0500
I suggest you download the AL-811 and AL-811H from the Ameritron web site then compare schematics/parts lists. That is what any other person would need to do to answer your question. If the schematic
/archives//html/Amps/2011-02/msg00077.html (14,394 bytes)

87. Re: [Amps] WARNING! W4RT (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:17:59 -0400
That's a terrible statement. There are a large number of sellers who operate e-mail based businesses out of their home as a "second job". In general they do not want "customers" showing up on their
/archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00425.html (11,949 bytes)

88. Re: [Amps] VL-2000 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:58:06 -0400
That's under rated ... with eight VRF-2366 the amplifiers should be capable of 2 KW output. The pictures of the two amplifier modules look like updated versions of the Helge Granberg "EB104" design
/archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00041.html (8,047 bytes)

89. Re: [Amps] 3cx400A7 and 8877 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 21:15:24 -0400
Not by a long shot! The 8874 is also known as a 3CX400A7 it is rated for only *half* the plate dissipation as the 3CX800A7. The 3CX800A7 also has significantly higher input capacitance in grounded g
/archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00185.html (9,845 bytes)

90. Re: [Amps] MRFE6VP Datasheet (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 00:39:00 -0400
Since the devices were designed for broadcast television applications, I suspect they are designed for AB operation and the pulse rating is a way of trying to prevent application designers from pushi
/archives//html/Amps/2011-08/msg00136.html (11,346 bytes)

91. Re: [Amps] MRFE6VP Datasheet (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:49:42 -0400
CW is only a 50% duty cycle if one is transmitting a string of dits. For alternating dits and dahs, the duty cycle is 66% (on for four dot periods and off for two dot periods). When one moves to tex
/archives//html/Amps/2011-08/msg00163.html (12,967 bytes)

92. Re: [Amps] ICOM PRO III QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:12:31 -0500
I don't have the link at hand or time to go looking for it right now but I've seen a rather extensive examination of T/R switching that shows the Icom rigs generally hot switch on returning to receiv
/archives//html/Amps/2011-12/msg00076.html (8,250 bytes)

93. Re: [Amps] ICOM PRO III QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:01:59 -0500
The study I saw (not the AD5X article) was not limited to the IC-7000. The "premature release" applied to all of the "small" radios 706/7000 as well as several of the full size radios - including 77
/archives//html/Amps/2011-12/msg00080.html (11,070 bytes)

94. Re: [Amps] ICOM PRO III QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:40:24 -0500
Yes, that's one of the sites I was looking for. You will notice that in all of the Icom radios shown, *including* the IC-746Pro and 756Pro, the HSEND line (cyan in the scope pictures) went high betw
/archives//html/Amps/2011-12/msg00083.html (13,270 bytes)

95. Re: [Amps] PRO III and ALpha 76 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 23:40:26 -0500
I would not drive any vacuum relays from an Icom ACC jack without a delay on break circuit unless I never planned to use QSK. The ACC jack will release 3 to 10 ms before the transceiver stops making
/archives//html/Amps/2011-12/msg00089.html (9,929 bytes)

96. Re: [Amps] ICOM PRO III QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:47:08 -0500
HSEND *is* the ACC output. HSEND = HF SEND on the rigs with 144 MHz and higher as they also have a VSEND (VHF SEND), typically for 144 and 430 MHz. For the HF or HF and 50 MHz only transceivers the
/archives//html/Amps/2011-12/msg00095.html (9,787 bytes)

97. Re: [Amps] FWD: Ham Radio Amp - $8500 (Louisville Ky) 3CX10000-a7 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:31:56 -0400
More likely since he also says "very little drive" the 4-400 is used in a grid driven driven configuration as a driver. That would be about right for 300W or so of carrier power to drive the 3CX-100
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00061.html (10,665 bytes)

98. Re: [Amps] Expert Amps 2K-FA: Any Opinions ? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:37:18 -0400
The so called SO2R capability is problematic for most conditions as it uses a separate multiband antenna for the non transmitting radio. It does not work well with the typical antenna system containi
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00235.html (9,997 bytes)

99. Re: [Amps] Expert Amps 2K-FA: Any Opinions ? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:55:57 -0400
Instead of providing two sets of antenna ports and routing the "second" (unselected) exciter around the amplifier, the Expert-1K and 2K both switch the "second" radio to a single "SO2R Antenna" port
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00239.html (16,099 bytes)

100. Re: [Amps] Tubes vs. Solid State (was) Expert Amps 2K-FA: Any Opinions ? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:58:40 -0400
I don't believe that for a minute if you compare apples to apples. Most of the tube designs have been significantly "over engineered". That is, the tubes have excess plate dissipation for the power
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00255.html (10,818 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu