Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mark@microenh.com: 724 ]

Total 724 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] Computer Contol of the Orion (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Thu Apr 17 16:31:59 2003
Carl, Your new software sounds interesting. I'll be looking forward to seeing it, although I doubt I'll have an Orion before the TT hamfest this fall. Do you already know how to get a receive signal
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00422.html (12,596 bytes)

82. [TenTec] Contol of the Orion/340 System (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Fri Apr 18 08:50:11 2003
about the RX ANT connection on the Orion is an input. Yes, I am wondering about an output to support an external receiver. On the Omni V, the RX ANT jack could be used either as an input for a recei
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00453.html (10,394 bytes)

83. [TenTec] Pegasus: No Output (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Tue Apr 22 00:17:06 2003
Jeff, This is interesting. I have some questions that might help diagnose things. 1) Does the receiver work? Can you tune to a known frequency and hear what you expect to hear (i.e. WWV at 10 or 15 M
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00585.html (9,356 bytes)

84. [TenTec] Pegasus: No Output (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Tue Apr 22 11:20:43 2003
Jeff, Thanks for the answers. I'm convinced that the software and computer is communicating properly with the Pegasus. I'm really tempted to say that something is wrong with the Pegasus, but I find i
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00594.html (11,342 bytes)

85. [TenTec] Slightly OT: SSB vs AM (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Tue Apr 22 11:43:12 2003
This is sort of related to the discussion on the list of late about HiFi SSB. I understand at a basic level the reason for improved performance of SSB over AM, i.e. only one sideband and no carrier.
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00595.html (8,564 bytes)

86. [TenTec] Slightly OT: SSB vs AM (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Tue Apr 22 17:08:07 2003
How do the circuits they use on TV to keep the audio pitch the same when they speed up the tape work? I know they do that so that can shorten the program and squeeze in more commercials. I remember w
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00606.html (8,647 bytes)

87. [TenTec] Slightly OT: SSB vs AM (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Tue Apr 22 21:14:38 2003
Carl, Yes, with that scheme we would change bandwidth for increased time. Kind of like how we can send a picture in SSTV, but it takes many seconds. However, I was proposing first doubling the speed
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00616.html (11,146 bytes)

88. [TenTec] Slightly OT: SSB vs AM (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Wed Apr 23 09:30:38 2003
Duane, I think it would be even more feasible to implement something like that in PC / soundcard software. Once the mode has proven itself, we might get TT interested in incorporating it in their rad
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00626.html (10,773 bytes)

89. [TenTec] Slightly OT: SSB vs AM (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Wed Apr 23 09:30:56 2003
Ron, The thing that has changed is the capability of today's PC. I suspect that with appropriate software, a PC with a soundcard could to the same thing and the expensive tape recorders. I would susp
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00627.html (13,813 bytes)

90. [TenTec] Slightly OT: SSB vs AM (Warning!: Heavy Sarcasm) (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Wed Apr 23 09:31:10 2003
Bill, No the current DRM project is to develop and test the methodology. There is development (and there is a picture of a prototype) of standalone receivers (even portables) that will be able to rec
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00628.html (9,295 bytes)

91. [TenTec] Ten-Tec used/demo list 25 April 03 (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Fri Apr 25 12:32:09 2003
Bill, The moderators of this reflector have configured the reflector so that the 'reply' button repies to the reflector. There has been discussion on this in the past and the gist of it is that they
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00694.html (8,193 bytes)

92. [TenTec] Jupiter and OMNI VI Plus (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Mon Apr 28 13:37:36 2003
Alan, I have an Omni VI (option 3 upgrade) and a Pegasus which has essentially the same receiver as the Jupiter. I had owned the Pegasus for over a year before I came across the Omni and was used to
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00759.html (9,892 bytes)

93. [TenTec] Argo V 10 hz display (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Mon Mar 3 22:03:27 2003
At least on the Argo that I had, the last digit was always 0. Mark
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00087.html (7,996 bytes)

94. [TenTec] Spare Tuning Knobs (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Tue Mar 4 08:55:17 2003
Are any of you who have upgraded your Jupiter tuning knob as per the W5JAY suggestion interestd in disposing of the original knob? I'm putting together a home brew 301 encoder for my Omni VI. I manag
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00098.html (6,679 bytes)

95. [TenTec] New ham looking at Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Wed Mar 5 10:40:39 2003
Jody, I'm not familiar with the FT920 or TS570 so I can't compare them, but I do think the Pegasus is a lot of radio for the money. While one of its strengths is the computer interface, one of the bi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00153.html (11,977 bytes)

96. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus Filters needed (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Wed Mar 5 11:05:04 2003
Too bad TT didn't give us three 9 MHz slots in the Omni VI. Of course the Orion does <g>. 73, Mark
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00155.html (9,541 bytes)

97. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus Filters needed (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Wed Mar 5 14:10:55 2003
You are right. I was referring to the two N1 and N2 slots. I didn't consider replacing the "stock" 2.4 kHz filter. Mark the the Radio Plus Plus the sell someone a
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00163.html (13,946 bytes)

98. [TenTec] New Buttons or Labels for Omni-6+ ?? (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Wed Mar 5 16:33:22 2003
Replacing buttons on the Omni front panel requires a bit a disassembly and reassembly, but can be done. Many people have replaced / rearranged the buttons on their Omni V when they upgraded to the Om
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00175.html (8,260 bytes)

99. [TenTec] Group replies vs. personal e-mail (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Wed Mar 5 16:53:30 2003
Scott, I think something may be configured differently somewhere. For example, when I hit Reply to your message, the To address is tentec@contesting.com. If I hit reply all, the return address is ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00176.html (12,691 bytes)

100. [TenTec] New ham looking at Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
Date: Thu Mar 6 11:01:54 2003
Unfortunately, no. I've been bugging TenTec since the Pegasus first came out to release information on writing custom DSP code, but they won't release it. Since the DSP firmware is flashable, if one
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00235.html (12,124 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu