Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mikewate@gmail.com: 1106 ]

Total 1106 documents matching your query.

221. Re: Topband: Two 2:1 transformers to choose from!! (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:57:54 -0500
I meant to add "unless you need a certain impedance ratio". _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00274.html (10,229 bytes)

222. Re: Topband: Two 2:1 transformers to choose from!! (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:40:44 -0500
This is the preamp I use. The circuit is from *Solid State Design For the Radio Amateur*, © 1977 ARRL. W8JI suggested it to me over 30 years ago (but I think he has much better preamp designs since t
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00277.html (10,214 bytes)

223. Re: Topband: Two 2:1 transformers to choose from!! (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 17:00:11 -0500
All those turns are better for what? For the winding that's connected to the coax (either 50 or 75 ohms), two turns is plenty. And good luck stuffing all that wire inside the holes in those binocular
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00284.html (8,559 bytes)

224. Re: Topband: Two 2:1 transformers to choose from!! (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 19:11:47 -0500
I'm not sure what kind of material you made that from, but 3 or even 4 turns is OK for the low-Z winding on the #73 solid 2-hole cores we were talking about earlier. It seemed to work well for you. :
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00286.html (9,625 bytes)

225. Re: Topband: Two 2:1 transformers to choose from!! (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:14:50 -0500
Ever since I added back-to-back 1N4148's between the preamp's input and ground many years ago, I have never lost a transistor in my preamp. Before that, it seemed that I was replacing it after nearly
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00311.html (11,120 bytes)

226. Re: Topband: 160 meter activity (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 23:26:22 -0500
Bill, The stations on the RBN are automatic, and work even when unattended. They are not like the DX clusters which require a manual post. Call CQ and see. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ To
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00328.html (7,526 bytes)

227. Re: Topband: 160 meter activity (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:16:36 -0500
Hi Bill, You are right about the antennas on some RBN stations missing signals. I wouldn't mind running a 160m skimmer on the RBN myself here, perhaps somehow using all four directions my Beverage an
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00333.html (9,860 bytes)

228. Re: Topband: Are stacked verticals feasible? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 19:34:24 -0500
Like Tom said earlier, it's all about ground loss. Near the sea, a 1/2 or 5/8 wave vertical may perform very differently than a duplicate antenna a long way from the sea. The near-field and far-field
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00034.html (21,011 bytes)

229. Re: Topband: Are stacked verticals feasible? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 19:40:33 -0500
On two meters, yes indeed. But we are talking about 160. To quote Tom above: "Also, for 160, antennas are near earth. Earth spoils everything. A 160 antenna at 260 feet is like a two meter antenna at
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00035.html (10,232 bytes)

230. Re: Topband: Are stacked verticals feasible? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 20:54:43 -0500
Hi Mike, No problem. I thought I ... nevermind, I guess I need to go back and read everything again more carefully. :-) But later. I'm listening on 160m right now. No offense taken, my friend. ______
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00037.html (31,712 bytes)

231. Re: Topband: Snap and Seal plugs (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 14:04:08 -0500
I don't understand these F-connector O-ring seal placement positions at all. On all of the plugs for RG-6 or F-6 I have ever had, if there was an o-ring (and there should be if it's outdoors) it went
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00065.html (7,516 bytes)

232. Re: Topband: Snap and Seal plugs (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 14:36:35 -0500
There are a lot of different types of snap-and-seal RG-6 plugs. The PDF that John references helps show that. Can we see a photo of your connectors? 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband R
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00067.html (7,300 bytes)

233. Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 20:29:39 -0500
3B9EME has been calling CQ (listening up ~1) on 1822 for over an hour. But they can't seem to hear very well. At one time, they were S7 here in SW Missouri. Someone tell them to put up a Beverage ant
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00135.html (6,947 bytes)

234. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 20:55:02 -0500
Well, they will be on for a few more days. http://www.qrz.com/db/3B9EME http://www.ari.verona.it/veronadxteam/3b9_2013.htm#x:3B9EME_inglese Friday night after sunset on 3505, they were S8 to S9 here.
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00137.html (8,447 bytes)

235. Re: Topband: CAT5 for Flag Antenna Feedline ? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 20:57:03 -0500
I hear that BOGs and Slinkys do too. Someday I'll try them here. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00138.html (14,995 bytes)

236. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:04:28 -0500
Your point is well taken. If I sounded like I was being unappreciative and/or critical of them, I didn't mean to be. I think their main objective was EME, and 160 was kind of an afterthought. However
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00146.html (8,036 bytes)

237. Re: Topband: Hairpin Matching Coil Questions (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 12:23:58 -0500
I didn't read everything in this thread, but there's a good alternative to a matching coil. On my 160m inverted-L, I just use two air variable capacitors, and they work great. One adjusts the impedan
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00238.html (8,904 bytes)

238. Re: Topband: WLW (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:54:52 -0500
Hi Mark, Saudi Arabia from a small loop! I know a seaside location is ideal, but now I just have to see if I can hear their carrier there on a Beverage here in the central USA. :-) I'm going to add t
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00244.html (8,594 bytes)

239. Re: Topband: Hairpin Matching Coil Questions (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:51:16 -0500
Ok, I found the photos, and I see that I need to take new ones of the present arrangement. But here's the capacitor values in the L network. - Between the 75 ohm coax center cond. and antenna: 350 pF
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00246.html (9,402 bytes)

240. Re: Topband: Hairpin Matching Coil Questions (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 05:45:03 -0500
Hi Jim, I'm glad to hear you (and others) liked our L-network inverted-L tuner design. All the info I have is posted in the Topband thread. I thought I had more info and pictures, but I guess I'll ha
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00272.html (9,974 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu