Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mikewate@gmail.com: 1106 ]

Total 1106 documents matching your query.

301. Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160??? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:12:58 -0600
Wouldn't feeding it up high in the corner like that at least eliminate the need for radials? 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00165.html (10,447 bytes)

302. Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160??? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:28:19 -0600
The only real way to tell is have one of each, and do many instant A-B comparisons over a period of time. I just have two 10'+ high elevated radials on my bottom-fed L. It seems to work "well", but I
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00170.html (11,195 bytes)

303. Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160??? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:20:08 -0600
The real key is "symmetrical", according to the stuff I re-read earlier today by Rudy, N6LF and K9YC. Mine aren't symmetrical. The N radial is straight; but the S radial has to zig-zag, because I'm t
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00173.html (11,760 bytes)

304. Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160??? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:45:05 -0600
Thanks, Guy. If I ever try this, it will very likely be on 80m first, and each half will be 1/4 wave. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00179.html (10,666 bytes)

305. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 21:56:31 -0600
73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00199.html (7,810 bytes)

306. Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160??? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:05:58 -0600
A very respected authority on radial systems, Rudy Severns N6LF, has this to say about 4 elevated radials: "Since my QST article I've done some modeling to explore the sensitivity of a simple 4-radia
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00200.html (13,440 bytes)

307. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:27:21 -0600
Here are the RFC part numbers, from http://www.ad5x.com/images/Articles/BiasT3amp.pdf "I finally settled on two J.W. Miller inductors that appeared acceptable. One was the 5250-RC 100 uHy inductor ra
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00205.html (8,536 bytes)

308. Re: Topband: End of a bias tee adventure? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:41:24 -0600
I would like to know where to get those diodes! Right after I bought my last MFJ-259B, I e-mailed MFJ about buying a spare or two just in case. They never replied. Anyone have a Mfg. name and P/N? 73
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00226.html (7,776 bytes)

309. Re: Topband: WAS 160 mts (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 21:36:10 -0600
I've worked all states on 160 including DC, but I can't (and don't care if I do) prove it to anyone. If the ARRL ever gets their LoTW stuff working on Linux ... 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _______________
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00263.html (7,697 bytes)

310. Topband: CS2C (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:40:49 -0600
Anyone know exactly where CS2C was operating from in the ARRL 160 this weekend? His report to me was Zone 14. Qrz.com confirms the zone, but it lists the op in Europe. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com ________
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00289.html (6,468 bytes)

311. Re: Topband: CS2C (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:59:24 -0600
Ok, I see the error of my ways now. DX Atlas was displaying ITU zones, and not CQ zones. That makes sense now. Thanks. And of course, I meant the CQ WW 160 contest, not the ARRL. :-) 73, Mike www.w0b
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00292.html (8,736 bytes)

312. Re: Topband: Digital mode spurious issues (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:32:17 -0600
I finally got around to installing WSJT-X. I haven't even read the manual, but it's decoding JT65 (and maybe JT9) signals on 160 and displaying callsigns just fine. You don't even have to tune the si
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00299.html (9,286 bytes)

313. Re: Topband: Submerging variable caps in oil as substituteforvacuumvariables (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 18:50:35 -0600
I did a Google search about 8 months ago, and I found what seemed to be an ideal liquid to use for this purpose. I forget what it was, but it had a low dissipation factor at HF and a good dielectric
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00038.html (8,971 bytes)

314. Re: Topband: Low band noise (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:33:59 -0600
Does it sound like an internal combustion engine idling, with little change in sound or frequency over time? I hear that from time to time and have no explanation for it. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _____
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00135.html (7,701 bytes)

315. Re: Topband: Ice (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:47:50 -0600
The last ice storm surely would have taken down my 160m inverted-L, had it not been for the counterweight at the end. (It's made from #16 THHN, not very strong.) The pulley did not completely ice up,
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00194.html (8,257 bytes)

316. Re: Topband: NQ4I (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:38:38 -0600
Need heaters inside the elements, at least towards the ends, that can be turned on to melt the ice. Where there's a will, there's a way to do that. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Re
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00197.html (7,734 bytes)

317. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:18:14 -0600
w0btu.com/Optimum_number_of_ground_radials_vs_radial_length.html Check the links on that page to N6LF, Rudy Severns' pages. His work has been called the gold standard of radial science. 73, Mike www.
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00200.html (8,906 bytes)

318. Topband: Contest in progress - few signals (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 18:16:55 -0600
There's a contest in progress --the ARRL Int. DX CW-- but you wouldn't know it from listening on 160. Where is everyone? The only two stations on 160 calling CQ TEST are K3LR and W3LPL. 73, Mike www.
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00280.html (6,568 bytes)

319. Re: Topband: Contest in progress - few signals (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 19:19:17 -0600
I didn't notice that the K index jumped to 5 until after I posted this. That doesn't help. But the 3 or 4 stations that I hear calling CQ are quite strong (S9+) in SW Missouri. W3LPL is S9+, but he h
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00282.html (7,996 bytes)

320. Re: Topband: Contest in progress - few signals (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 21:19:42 -0600
I kind of thought that might have been the case. :-) Anyway, the band is much better now. I've been hearing Europe and SA. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http:/
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00286.html (8,302 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu