Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mikewate@gmail.com: 1106 ]

Total 1106 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Topband: Home Depot LED bulb interference. (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 05:00:02 -0500
Right now, the FCC is actively seeking input concerning impediments to amateur radio communications. IMO, if there was ever an impediment --especially to weak-signal Topband communications-- it is RF
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00060.html (10,186 bytes)

62. Re: Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 21:30:09 -0500
You don't need 120 radials. The optimum radial length is shown on the chart at http://www.w0btu.com/Optimum_number_of_ground_radials_vs_radial_length.html 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _____________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00009.html (6,980 bytes)

63. Re: Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 13:33:35 -0500
Thanks for the wisdom, Rich. :-) However, I've always wondered about the following statement. My question is, on what amateur bands is this common? And on what amateur bands is this possible? 73, Mik
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00040.html (8,515 bytes)

64. Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns) (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 19:17:58 -0500
That's exactly what I was thinking. 1000' foot spools of flooded Commscope RG-6 are well under $100 shipped, last time I bought some off eBay. That's what I feed my Beverages with. Having said that,
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00087.html (8,640 bytes)

65. Re: Topband: Monopole Radiation Patterns, takeoff angles etc (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 20:04:02 -0500
I'm pretty sure this surface wave at ~0 degrees elevation is useful on (and below) the AM broadcast band (especially the lower portion) and 160 meters. But what about at 3.5, 5, 7, 10, 14, 18, 21, 24
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00090.html (9,906 bytes)

66. Re: Topband: Monopole Radiation Patterns, takeoff angles etc (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 20:13:03 -0500
And this seems like a good place and time to ask another question. I get the experience that the usefulness of NVIS radiation peaks around 80 meters. It's not useful on the AM broadcast band, and it'
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00092.html (9,281 bytes)

67. Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns) (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 21:05:15 -0500
Multiple Beverages at the same feedpoint? When I put up my Beverages, I avoided doing that because I read at least one bad experience of someone who tried that. (My Beverage feed points are hundreds
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00098.html (8,955 bytes)

68. Re: Topband: Monopole Radiation Patterns, takeoff angles etc (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 21:22:28 -0500
I've never operated mobile, but it sounds like you're saying the daytime local range on 160 and 10 is comparable. But Rich is also talking about the radiation at zero degrees bouncing off the ionosph
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00099.html (10,274 bytes)

69. Re: Topband: Monopole Radiation Patterns, takeoff angles etc (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 21:35:16 -0500
Let me expand on what I said previously. I always thought that ground wave propagation decreased with frequency. For example, don't AM broadcast stations in the lower end of the AM broadcast band hav
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00100.html (11,804 bytes)

70. Re: Topband: Two wire Beverage Question (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 11:47:06 -0500
I don't think the length is the reason that you're not hearing any signals or noise in the reverse direction. How well does it work on 40 in the forward direction? I don't know all the details of wha
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00169.html (8,051 bytes)

71. Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 08:44:06 -0500
Is this the Beverage above the fence that you mean, Greg? http://www.g3xrj.com/RxArray_files/2wire_bev/2wire_bev.htm That was a good article. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com __________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00182.html (7,263 bytes)

72. Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 14:12:28 -0500
Herb, Very common problem, with a simple solution. Ants are attracted to the magnetic field around energized wires. Turn off the power to your Beverages whenever you're not using them, and I'll bet t
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00193.html (9,267 bytes)

73. Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 15:19:50 -0500
There's just one possible issue about all this that is conspicuous by its absence, as they say. At least in some installations, having feedlines going to each end of the Beverage supports is going to
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00195.html (10,129 bytes)

74. Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 12:57:36 -0500
I'd be interested in looking inside one, too, but exactly what IS their price for everything you need? I see a bunch of separate components on their web site, but no system package containing it all.
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00218.html (9,957 bytes)

75. Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 16:30:44 -0500
Well, I have a good reason for asking. I may very well offer a complete bi-directional Beverage antenna system for sale someday. (And I gar-ran-tee you that no ants, etc. will be able to get inside.
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00222.html (10,098 bytes)

76. Re: Topband: Archives List (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 08:45:12 -0500
Here you go: http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/topband/ 73, Mike www,w0btu.com _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... .
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00225.html (6,740 bytes)

77. Re: Topband: Strange CW Coded Messages (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:38:03 -0500
Sounds like fishing net beacons, Joe. http://www.genesisradio.com.au/VK2DX/fishnet.html http://www.w8ji.com/ndb%20beacon%20fish%20buoy%20net%20beacons.htm 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _____________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00079.html (7,152 bytes)

78. Re: Topband: Strange CW Coded Messages (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:58:44 -0500
Hi Joe, There was quite a bit of discussion about fishnet beacons here a year or two ago. If you search back through the Topband archives, you might find your answer. http://lists.contesting.com/arch
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00081.html (7,698 bytes)

79. Re: Topband: Strange CW Coded Messages (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:02:28 -0500
Those blasted illegal fishnet buoy transmitters are in use all over the world. I haven't spent much time on 160 in over a year, and I almost forgot about them till you mentioned them. I could usually
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00082.html (8,774 bytes)

80. Re: Topband: Stew Perry, Summer Edition, less than 24 hours away! (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:40:33 -0500
Here's the page that I regularly look at to determine whether I want to go listen on 160 or 80: http://www.intellicast.com/Storm/Severe/Lightning.aspx And if I want to know if a specific DX location
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00106.html (8,594 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu