A very good explanation at http://www.qrz.com/db/rw2l . 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m
The rules require that the station sending the exchange put their call in the exchange. There is no rule that requires the other station's call to be in the exchange. Apples and oranges comparison. O
These would be much better questions/comments on the N1MM Logger reflector. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://li
I respectfully disagree. IMHO, here is a perfectly acceptable SS QSO: CQ SS CQ SS WW3DE SS N2IC N2IC 321 B WW3DE 70 DE TU 456 B N2IC 68 NM TU WW3DE SS 73, Steve, N2IC ________________________________
How would anyone ever research that I was WN2ICU, and got my first license in 1968 ? Please, can you folks please get a life and do something productive - like prepare your stations for Phone SS and
Warning: Self-serving posting below :) It's been a long time since I could say this in late November, but... 10 meters has open between eastern USA/Canada and western USA/Canada every day for the pas
The contesting.com home page is now ready for your CQWW 2010 photos. Please share them with the contesting community. Go to the www.contesting.com. On the right side of the page, click on "Add CQWW 2
I recommend that all RR participants take their required 6-hour time-off from 22Z-04Z. That would certainly make the 40 meter situation more manageable. Come play in the NAQP CW during those hours !
That's not completely accurate. The RTTY Roundup is sponsored by the ARRL. The NAQP is sponsored by the National Contest Journal. The ARRL is the publisher and distributor of the National Contest Jou
Yeah, the RTTY Roundup is starting to look like a better option for that weekend (: . Many thanks to NAQP Manager, WA7BNM. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest m
"Technological methods of copying the information in the contest exchange are permitted as long as they are entirely contained within the station." 73, Steve, N2IC ___________________________________
Tor, When a new station shows up, please explain how your program knows if it is a dupe without decoding CW ? 73 and HNY, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin
Now that almost every country in the world can operate 40 meters up to 7200, is there still a good reason why the suggested 40 meter RTTY segment should be so low in the band ? 73, Steve, N2IC ______
For 2009, the Phone SS Expanded Results has that information (but only for 2009). http://www.arrl.org/files/file/ContestResults/2009/2009%20ARRL%20SSB%20Sweepstakes%20-%20Expanded%20Results%20-%20Ver
Perennial winners ? Look at the top-5 in the August CW NAQP, that was just published in the January/February NCJ. Compare that to the high-claimed scores in last weekends' NAQP. A very different list
I agree with W5OV, but let a few more provisions: - If you are running several independent, single-operator, single-band entries from one location, you cannot pass multipliers (or non-multipliers) fr
The irony here is that this is exactly the method used today by a leading amateur radio antenna installation and maintenance company. See http://www.pbase.com/df3kv/beam_repair 73, Steve, N2IC ______
No it wouldn't. You mostly-CW guys are forgetting that the RDXC is a multi-mode contest - CW and SSB. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contes
There seems to be some confusion about changing to distance-based scoring. There is no need to change the ARRL DX contest exchange to implement distance-based scoring. The CTY.DAT files already have
I would like to see a little more data, comparing NQ4I and K3LR to other well-equipped stations in the SE USA, such as: K5GO (M/2) NR4M (M/M) W4RM (M/2) N4WW (M/S) NY4A (M/M) K4TD (S/15) N4PN (S/15)