Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] what's the difference between ICE 419, 419A, 419B? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark" <>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:03:28 -0500
They all seem to be marked the same. Not the greatest out of band rejection, and wondered if there were improvements and what they are. Mark n2qt _______________________________________________ CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00232.html (7,159 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dead horse: CQ WW rules apparently prohibit CWSkimmeruse (score: 1)
Author: "Mark" <>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:29:57 -0400
Since the spots output from the skimmer look like the spots from packet (ie callsign and freq) then it seems sensible that the two methods are also equivalent, ie assisted. If it quacks like a duck .
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00329.html (15,373 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ICE 419 Schematic (A vs B?) (score: 1)
Author: "Mark" <>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:37:32 -0400
while we're on this topic, does anyone know the difference between the ICE 419, 419A and 419B? Mark n2qt _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00213.html (9,647 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Plaques - Who should win them? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark n2qt" <>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:14:46 -0500
sounds like a winner to me. Mark n2qt (still hoping to EVER win a plaque) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00039.html (9,939 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Categories, Participation and Competition (score: 1)
Author: "Mark n2qt" <>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:42:42 -0400
There are examples of an officially sanctioned contest within a contest. The BARTG rtty contest has a 6 hour variant running along with the 'normal' test. It's good for those with limited time, and i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00236.html (10,558 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: 55th Worked All Europe DX Contest (WAEDC) CW (score: 1)
Author: "Mark n2qt" <>
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 09:47:21 -0400
I happened to be reading the Sept 1955 issue of CQ which gave the rules for the first WAEDC. It was most interesting to see the use of substitutes for countries within the USSR that did not allow ham
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00115.html (11,443 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Bandpass filter, now triplexers (score: 1)
Author: "Mark n2qt" <>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 08:52:20 -0400
4O3A was showing high power filters at Dayton this year (and on the back cover of the current issue of NCJ.) Both Dunestar and InRad have 100 watt class triplexers, reviewed in QST June 2012. Also th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00049.html (23,243 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] WPX RTTY report suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Mark <>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:36:01 -0500
For those of us who click on reports please use the three digit form. It's much easier to click on 001 than on 1. Of course also be sure you include a space at the end of your call so you print as N2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00219.html (7,089 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu