Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4zr@contesting.com: 269 ]

Total 269 documents matching your query.

21. Topband: Why is FM5BH loud? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:34:42 -0500
What is he using for an antenna on 160? He was consistently louder than any other DX this weekend at my QTH (near DC), and louder than many domestic stations as well. 73, Pete N4ZR Sometimes a tower
/archives//html/Topband/2002-11/msg00154.html (6,557 bytes)

22. Topband: Why is FM5BH loud? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:10:42 -0500
Yes. Thanks, George. Brain fade... 73, Pete N4ZR Sometimes a tower is just a tower
/archives//html/Topband/2002-11/msg00155.html (6,922 bytes)

23. Topband: ZL7C on 160 (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:57:32 -0400
Operator was heard to say on 15 today that they would be alternating 80 and 160 tonight. No other specifics heard. 73, Pete N4ZR Sometimes a tower is just a tower
/archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00113.html (6,193 bytes)

24. Topband: Large TSTM areas as MF "wall" (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:51:10 -0500
NASA was doing some research on coupling between severe thunderstorm activity and the ionosphere above the storm areas, but I don't recall any data or conclusions. 73, Pete N4ZR Sometimes a tower is
/archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00156.html (7,467 bytes)

25. Topband: 160 Propagation & Weather (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:08:49 -0500
Kazimrovsky et al seems to be mainly a catalogue of questions that still need to be answered. The paper is available at http://eos.wdcb.ru/transl/gma/9503/pap01.htm There are a few additional resourc
/archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00165.html (8,211 bytes)

26. Topband: 80m shunt feed -DESCRIPTION (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 08:01:45 -0400
On the other hand, if the SWR minimum is adequately low and the SWR bandwidth sufficiently broad, does it matter much? I had endless frustration with my much different tower trying to do what Ford su
/archives//html/Topband/2002-08/msg00007.html (8,026 bytes)

27. Topband: 4U1UN and VP9 activity (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 13:40:50 -0400
I wouldn't hold my breath. At one point K2GM, an enthusiastic contest op, was either trustee or at least a principal operator. I remember visiting the station with him back in the 1980s when he told
/archives//html/Topband/2002-08/msg00073.html (8,449 bytes)

28. Topband: Silent Feedline for RX antennas (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 17:56:22 -0400
This stuff was extensively used in Wang computer and word processing networks during the 80s. I bet there are still spools of it out there someplace. I'd start with E-bay -- one trade name was Twinax
/archives//html/Topband/2002-08/msg00084.html (8,287 bytes)

29. Topband: Silent Feedline for RX antennas (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 07:12:03 -0400
I think I may have confused things by throwing the trade name "Twinax" into the equation. The stuff we used with Wang computers and WP gear was more like 2x RG59, 2 1/4 inch coaxial cables in one mol
/archives//html/Topband/2002-08/msg00090.html (9,016 bytes)

30. Topband: Discouraging News re 4U1UN (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 06:48:22 -0400
And how would you go about getting legal authority to use the callsign? 73, Pete N4ZR Sometimes a tower is just a tower
/archives//html/Topband/2002-08/msg00105.html (6,900 bytes)

31. Topband: A wee bit more on power coupling (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 07:51:32 -0400
Well then, I guess I share Tom's confusion. You did state that verticals would be the antennas of choice in NA and EU, based on the amount of insertion loss for a dipole. It seems reasonable to ask,
/archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00079.html (8,696 bytes)

32. Topband: More on 160 dipoles (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 07:54:19 -0400
And thanks also to Bill for pulling it all together, for those of us who were hanging on to the topic by our fingernails. Is this effect entirely absent at 80m, or just very much reduced? 73, Pete N4
/archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00095.html (7,335 bytes)

33. Topband: Shunt feeding a tower with side mounted yagi (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 20:08:56 -0400
I have a 104' shunt fed Rohn 25 tower that combines the complication of a mid-mounted tribander with feedlines for a K3LR/W9LT lazy vee dipole array coupling to the tower at about 45 feet up. A serie
/archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00192.html (9,947 bytes)

34. Topband: Tail Ending Legitimate (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 09:32:38 -0500
If this is the usage on 160, I can only reply that it is unique to that band. On other bands "tail-ending" refers to attempts to drop one's call in *before* the next round of calling begins, and can,
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00036.html (8,940 bytes)

35. Topband: Topband Takeoff Angles & ICEPAC (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 08:24:40 -0500
But don't expect to download them, crank 'em up, and immediately get meaningful data. There is a huge learning curve, as befits a very complex subject. Even when you understand all the output modes (
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00060.html (8,056 bytes)

36. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 07:17:36 -0500
The thing that rang my bell most was the fact that you will be able to run very narrow roofing bandwidths on the main RX, which should really make a difference in contest conditions. Unless you're re
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00069.html (8,766 bytes)

37. Topband: MFJ power line noise receiver or alternatives? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:13:29 +0000
.... Why wouldn't it be even more cost-effective to buy something like the Icom IC-Q7A dual band handi-talkie, with 78-330 MHz AM receive capability built in? AES advertised this tiny little thing in
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00096.html (8,513 bytes)

38. Topband: Reactance problem (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:12:44 -0500
work with it that the MFJ259B is quite sensitive to BC band and/or any other "strong RF" coming in off the antenna in question. I do not live particularly close to BC stations but was getting strange
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00122.html (8,889 bytes)

39. Topband: XR0X on 160 (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:37:45 -0500
In my limited experience, these work great if it really is a discrete source, like the infamous thermostatically-controlled dog dish. They tend not to be much help if the noisemaker is up on a pole c
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00189.html (7,753 bytes)

40. Topband: 160 DX with limited resources (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:47:18 -0500
Of course -- for evidence look no farther than N6BT's story about working WAC on 10 meters with an array of light bulbs on his deck rail.
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00255.html (7,023 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu