Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:olinger@bellsouth.net: 438 ]

Total 438 documents matching your query.

381. Re: Topband: Teflon Sleeving vs Heatshrink for the Homemade FCP (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 08:43:54 -0500
You should be able to get your length of standard wall PTFE tubing from Asian markets easily without the overhead of US international postage. A millimeter equivalent diameter that is not smaller tha
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00122.html (9,940 bytes)

382. Re: Topband: Teflon Sleeving vs Heatshrink for the Homemade FCP (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:28:34 -0500
Short version: There is always an urge to see how little we can get away with. It's an experimenter's itch. I understand it well. It's an Olympic sport around here in the crowd I run with. But we do
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00176.html (13,416 bytes)

383. Re: Topband: Toroidal common mode choke (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:48:44 -0500
What I like about some of the #31 stuff is that I can get those large clamp-ons, wind a particular kind of conductor through it, and then put it up on my analyzer and "tune" that nice resistance hump
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00328.html (12,279 bytes)

384. Re: Topband: Looking to improve TX antenna Efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:22:11 -0500
We need to put gorilla detectors in SWR meters. Loss in the ground counterpole will be the thousand pound gorilla in the room. Heavily bent antennas as you describe lower the radiation resistance sig
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00330.html (11,883 bytes)

385. Re: Topband: Inverted L SWR Jumps ??? (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:12:58 -0500
The change in an overheating core has a swing to it and you can watch the SWR change, in a continuous fashion, while you are transmitting, while arcs exhibit sudden change. What you call "imbalance"
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00445.html (10,937 bytes)

386. Re: Topband: REVERSE BEACON (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:12:20 -0500
After watching these kind of results for months and months until I was bleeding from the eyeballs, I came to some conclusions. 1) There are calm steady propagation nights, and there are wildly varyin
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00472.html (11,913 bytes)

387. Re: Topband: High noise with Rx antennae (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:19:07 -0500
You may want to take this onto the Elecraft reflector, but I would definitely check all the K3 sub RX mini coax connections and make sure they are seated properly and firmly. All you need is for one
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00473.html (12,632 bytes)

388. Re: Topband: detuning shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:50:35 -0500
Oh, sounds like you are on the cleanup trail. Chasing out the noise is often the major eye-opening event for state of the station. Trust nothing, investigate everything. Measure, measure, measure. Si
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00499.html (8,421 bytes)

389. Re: Topband: buried radials vs radials on the ground (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:56:05 -0500
Short version: Believe what you measured. Long version: We did measurements of this for understanding and designing BOGs some years back. In the upper east central part of North Carolina (contains Ra
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00214.html (14,167 bytes)

390. Re: Topband: Shunt fed towers and common mode chokes (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 03:20:51 -0500
I'm with Tom on this one. This is not a noise suppression problem The placement up high on the tower means that the common mode path is nearer a voltage node than a current node and we are talking ab
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00232.html (11,535 bytes)

391. Re: Topband: Not so Boring report (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 17:08:21 -0500
Alas, will I never see the likes of 1957-58 ever again for working EU on 6M using an "end-fed" window screen for an antenna? On the other hand, now that I have a couple really good trees to support 1
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00263.html (8,064 bytes)

392. Re: Topband: Help With 80M Array (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:13:09 -0500
That sounds more like relays are not being gotten voltage out at the PVS switch unit. 1,2,3,G all have to be separate wires to the controller. Particularly suspicious like G may be mixed up with one
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00304.html (13,199 bytes)

393. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:54:03 -0500
With the following caveat: The very sparse and short buried radial systems he is showing are FAR more lossy in practice than shown in his gain tables. Four twenty foot buried radials beneath a 1/4 wa
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00326.html (12,844 bytes)

394. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:13:35 -0500
Not all loss is visible as series resistance in the counterpoise system, which is the tack you are taking. Note that a dummy load is 50 ohms, and does not radiate worth a hoot. It takes modeling to i
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00332.html (16,932 bytes)

395. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:34:20 -0500
[I may have sent an incomplete version of something on this topic. Apologies] 6 dB would be someone's calculation based on currents. The sometimes abysmal performance of a ground rod based vertical s
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00336.html (21,526 bytes)

396. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:13:33 -0500
Interspersed. Yes, indeed. But where do those ground losses ACTUALLY start? Why is it that what you call "far far" ground losses can vary by raising very low feed points small amounts above ground th
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00342.html (17,306 bytes)

397. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:35:11 -0500
I have already spoken extensively that your assertion is not proved, NOR is the counter-assertion proved. I have no intentions of adding to that. I am not persuaded either way, though BOTH sides of t
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00350.html (9,608 bytes)

398. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:56:34 -0500
Short version: ** WARNING: Most locations do not have the fortunate circumstances to support sparse or miscellaneous radial systems without exaggerated loss, and the builder with constrained circumst
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00359.html (18,403 bytes)

399. Topband: Lab style comparison results on 160m small lot antenna changes. (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:25:38 -0500
"Who has done that, with only a radial change, against an unchanged reference antenna that is in the far field of the antenna under test. [Where's the post with the details] ?" Perfectly logical ques
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00552.html (21,265 bytes)

400. Re: Topband: Inverted L question (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:40:50 -0500
Completely agree with Tom. Tom didn't elaborate on just how BAD that loss can be. Think of your L and your tower as being two windings on the same transformer. If the base of your tower is just in th
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00597.html (8,857 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu