Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:patrick_g@windstream.net: 908 ]

Total 908 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TowerTalk] Towable towers available from the government (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 12:18:03 -0500
My FAA comment was facetious as I am almost 30 miles from the nearest small airports in various directions. Most likely I will be putting a tower up over 100 ft but not over 200 ft. I wonder what the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00009.html (10,005 bytes)

122. Re: [TowerTalk] Method of calculating phase delay variation (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:39:59 -0500
"Imagine your antennas canceling each other out." Cancellation would not happen in all directions, just some "lobes." Unless of course there were special circumstances such as vertical antennas mount
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00033.html (8,622 bytes)

123. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Method of calculating phase delay variation (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 07:21:19 -0500
Technically correct, Hans but where are those constructive interference energies directed ? I think not in any useful directions desired for normal ham use. I suppose I should have made it clear I wa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00047.html (11,613 bytes)

124. Re: [TowerTalk] Hy-gain Hy-Tower versus 53 ft Vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 08:50:36 -0500
I have the new style recent manufacture Hy-Tower on top of a metal barn sans radials and sans concrete base. It is a good performer. I have the accessory kits which give you 17M and 160M. It handles
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00079.html (10,562 bytes)

125. Re: [TowerTalk] HyTower vs other verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:02:29 -0500
AMEN Robert! As I roof mounted my HT on a 40 year old metal barn that has survived tornado alley its whole life except for the two 14x14 doors being blown off, I chose to give it a 4-way Phillystran
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00103.html (11,643 bytes)

126. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 hardware and aluminum treatment for corrosion resistance (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:34:14 -0500
Sea going vessels with aluminum superstructures and welded-on-deck vertical aluminum channels (think channel iron but aluminum instead) for mounting tuners and or antennas with stainless steel fasten
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00145.html (14,140 bytes)

127. Re: [TowerTalk] Crank-up Tower Lube (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:37:40 -0500
Beeswax is good. Teflon spray that dries well so as to not attract/hold dust and grit is good. You can also use silicone spray (favoring multiple coats.) I prefer not to use anything that will hold o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00162.html (8,988 bytes)

128. Re: [TowerTalk] Shielding - slight OT (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 06:34:49 -0500
Small world... I had 1/2 time job while undergrad physics senior. I used a multi channel chart recorder to print out the audio signatures of H bomb blasts from 4000 nautical miles away via undersea p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00081.html (9,115 bytes)

129. Re: [TowerTalk] Driving ground rods (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 21:20:03 -0500
Ditto, I use a Harbor Freight demo hammer and a home brew insert (to avoid $80 + shipping for store bought AKA COTS.) Works good but in really hard ground takes a while and don't forget the hearing p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00183.html (9,909 bytes)

130. Re: [TowerTalk] Driving ground rods (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 22:04:05 -0500
I was commenting on 5/8 ground rods. Hard ground and a sledge will bend a 5/8 or 3/4 way too much to continue driving long before it is half in the ground, hence the utility of placing a piece of wat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00187.html (13,826 bytes)

131. Re: [TowerTalk] Driving ground rods (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:49:59 -0500
If anyone is interested in buying a Harbor Freight (inexpensive) demo hammer don't buy the smallest one. They don't carry the one I have anymore but they have a larger one and a smaller one. I have s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00197.html (12,731 bytes)

132. Re: [TowerTalk] Driving ground rods (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:29:24 -0500
Rick, it seems there is no free lunch. I read the specs on all three demo hammers you gave ID numbers for and although any of the three "might" work in some situations only a trial will tell. Compari
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00212.html (11,325 bytes)

133. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn SSV or is it? Stump the experts. (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 07:54:12 -0500
I too acquired a (probable) Rohn tower, part of one anyway. Triangular configuration, 4 inch tubular legs with 1/4 inch wall thickness. It is 20 ft sections connected by bolting together welded-on fl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00282.html (13,338 bytes)

134. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:53:05 -0500
Richard, It isn't an issue of what you can get away with and not be prosecuted. The protest was based on civility and pedagogical considerations. The original protest was based on the protester's per
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00442.html (17,602 bytes)

135. Re: [TowerTalk] COAX on CRANKUP-how to hang (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:46:17 -0500
I'd love to hear from folks who raise and lower crank-ups remotely without problems as I aspire to be able to do that with two upcoming tower installs. As regards coax getting blown by wind into the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00458.html (12,110 bytes)

136. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:29:58 -0500
Jim and Steve, Thank you gentlemen. One gets all kinds of advice and much misinformation from the community at large but this forum seems a cut above. I appreciate getting reasonable answers to my qu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00463.html (18,022 bytes)

137. Re: [TowerTalk] COAX on CRANKUP-how to hang (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:51:18 -0500
Yet another fine idea. Thanks Gary. Patrick AF5CK With respect to your comment regarding: If the coax were run through a weather/UV resistant sleeve of sufficient diameter... I found Non-Metallic Con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00465.html (13,319 bytes)

138. Re: [TowerTalk] minimum guy radius (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:34:49 -0500
Lots of assumptions are made doing things like this. Sometimes relatively reasonable assumptions only colored a bit by economic considerations result in disaster. Winter of 1960-61 Cqprock New Mexico
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00484.html (12,175 bytes)

139. Re: [TowerTalk] COAX on CRANKUP-how to hang (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:23:22 -0500
My #1 tower location is not visible from my shack. It is located well away from the edge of my lot (1/2 mile by 1/2 mile or 25 or so city blocks of space) The base of the triangular section of the to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00488.html (11,321 bytes)

140. Re: [TowerTalk] minimum guy radius (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:03:30 -0500
During a period of the successive evolutionary improvements of the design of arches in ancient Rome it was the custom that the architect/engineer would stand under the arch as the scaffold was remove
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00492.html (9,748 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu