Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws@plaws.net: 430 ]

Total 430 documents matching your query.

261. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:01:14 -0500
Got #410 in July, 2005, as N5UWY/9. All cards. Got #906 a few weeks back (issued 2011-03-01) as N5UWY. All LOTW. Didn't think it was that hard, just took a while to collect the LOTW "QSLs". In fact,
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00142.html (8,693 bytes)

262. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:49:26 -0500
Not any more. :-) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00152.html (9,166 bytes)

263. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:29:17 -0500
Submitted 2011-02-08, paper issued 2011-03-01 and received a week or so later. Go to "Awards", select the WAS "account" you used to make the application, then click "Application History". What does t
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00172.html (8,205 bytes)

264. Re: [RTTY] League Certificates (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:38:59 -0500
I didn't think I'd like the new design for the WAS certificate, but I do. Sadly, they use the same old crappy fonts to add the new information. If HQ was smart, and I don't think that will happen unt
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00254.html (7,787 bytes)

265. Re: [RTTY] RST in contests (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:41:42 -0500
Agreed. I believe I will begin sending non-59/599 reports next contest. My log will say "589" but will the other guys? See what the sponsors do about that! If they don't match, will they be penalized
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00255.html (7,521 bytes)

266. Re: [RTTY] RST incontests (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:13:25 -0500
Hard to tell where anyone was, but I did notice that there were a number of stations signing "portable" because they don't live in their "home" district. Hope they've all applied for LoTW certs for t
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00265.html (7,423 bytes)

267. Re: [RTTY] Logbook of the World (LOTW) RTTY Confirmations (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:59:20 -0500
We RTTY ops are the smartest and best-looking. Duh. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00282.html (7,944 bytes)

268. Re: [RTTY] Time setting program (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:17:08 -0500
Posted these messages regarding accurate time on your station PC to a couple lists over the last few years. W3HCF's Network Time Protocol remains -- after some 30 years -- the gold standard of networ
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-05/msg00076.html (10,142 bytes)

269. Re: [RTTY] NEW! The 10-Meter RTTY Contest (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:49:17 -0500
I like RTTY contests and I like SSB contests - don't make me choose! I'm with Ed here, let's try it stand-alone and see how that works out. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-05/msg00122.html (7,986 bytes)

270. [RTTY] PC components suitable for radio room use? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:15:23 -0500
Chen mentioned that most USB-based "sound cards" are better than their PCI predecessors and that, unless you go ultra cheap, they are all pretty good. Anyone have a list? What I'm really looking for
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00080.html (7,849 bytes)

271. Re: [RTTY] PC components suitable for radio room use? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:37:13 -0500
I understand how to buy stuff, what I'm really looking for is a site that lists all kinds of components (CPU+motherboards, power supplies, disks, etc) that are known by hams to be quiet in a radio ro
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00083.html (8,009 bytes)

272. Re: [RTTY] PC components suitable for radio room use? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:42:04 -0500
AFAIK, my current, 7 year old LCD isn't noisy (built-in chokes on the VGA cable). I don't anticipate replacing the display, though I'm sure it will go and I'll switch to DVI or DP. But not yet Class
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00084.html (8,451 bytes)

273. Re: [RTTY] PC components suitable for radio room use? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:46:00 -0500
Not exactly what I meant, but it's close enough! Didn't think about the Flex guys. Probably ought to skim their fora as well since they would be more interested in RFI-proof PCs than most folks. Than
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00091.html (8,326 bytes)

274. [RTTY] Booooo (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:18:21 -0500
"The Board accepted a recommendation to change the name of the RTTY DXCC Award to Digital DXCC." Guess I need to get that application in TONIGHT before they change them! -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaw
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00205.html (7,105 bytes)

275. Re: [RTTY] Booooo (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:04:57 -0500
Hybrid application submitted around 0400 UTC today. Still says "RTTY" and hope my certificate says same. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ___________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00223.html (8,387 bytes)

276. Re: [RTTY] Yep Boooo (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:46:17 -0500
And if you work 100 countries using RTTY, you get RTTY DXCC. For now ... Just needed to bring it back on-topic. :-D -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00235.html (7,967 bytes)

277. Re: [RTTY] Digital Oscilloscope for tuning RTTY? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:29:00 -0500
MMTTY will do that. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00283.html (8,244 bytes)

278. Re: [RTTY] Digital DXCC or ARRL Board of Directors, respectfully: have my strong disagreement (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 18:23:59 -0500
I would prefer to keep the RTTY award ... but .... to add another mode award (i.e. one for Digital, one for RTTY) will dilute the DXCC "brand". Some will say "continue to dilute" given that the WARC
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00026.html (9,567 bytes)

279. Re: [RTTY] Digital DXCC or ARRL Board of Directors, respectfully: have my strong disagreement (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:53:27 -0500
First, LOTW is not DXCC. LOTW is just a way to collect credits to apply to various ARRL awards (no one else, even IARU, will us it and that's a shame though understandable). I don't think *more* awar
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00056.html (11,854 bytes)

280. Re: [RTTY] Digital DXCC or ARRL Board of Directors, respectfully: have my strong disagreement (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:15:37 -0500
There is no 20-m SSB DXCC award. You can get a Phone DXCC and a 20-m DXCC but not a band-mode DXCC. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00062.html (11,269 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu