Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:richard@karlquist.com: 1580 ]

Total 1580 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [TowerTalk] Top hat on mobile usefull? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
I have a W6HIQ mobile antenna, the 4 inch, 160 meter version. Because of tooling limitations, the coil is limited to something like 12 inches. With the wire size W6HIQ chose, there isn't quite enoug
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00836.html (8,993 bytes)

242. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 4 square active antenna receive system (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:07:46 -0700
I found that a four element vertical array had essentially identical performance to my 560 ft beverage on 80 and 160. I have two of the DX Engineering ARAH-1 active receive antennas for sale. They ca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00071.html (9,556 bytes)

243. Re: [TowerTalk] Roller inductor sources (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:43:58 -0700
Moving the balun to the input does not affect core loss or balance. It does however change the operating conditions for *differential* mode current. If the balun is made of 50 ohm coax + ferrite, th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00668.html (10,111 bytes)

244. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Foundation Question (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
FWIW: We just paid $5K for a 6 foot diameter 9 foot deep drilled pier base. That's a turnkey price, including concrete, rebar, anchor bolts, grouting, and setting tower on the base. A few years ago w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00776.html (8,014 bytes)

245. Re: [TowerTalk] RMC 1000 Remote cable (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:13:42 -0800 (PST)
I bought my tower from W6BH. They replaced all the crankups at the Table Mountain remote site for this reason. They needed to be cranked down in case of a wind storm, but it was not possible to drive
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00113.html (9,565 bytes)

246. Re: [TowerTalk] RMC 1000 Remote cable (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:22:23 -0800 (PST)
You would need at least a coax and rotor cable to go through this joint. My long range plan is to have a stack, requiring multiple coax and rotor cables. This would be quite non trivial to build a r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00118.html (8,629 bytes)

247. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter quad loops (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 05:54:20 -0800
I just put up an inverted vee that is cut for 80 CW. I have a 250 pF series capacitor on the coax side of the balun. A set of normally open relay contacts are across this capacitor. When energized, t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00152.html (10,510 bytes)

248. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower Cables (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 07:30:03 -0800
Oh that's easy: 'cuz UST sez replace 'em every 3 years :-) (even though they supply zero documentation on the cables). I was supposed to replace mine in 1987. I'll get around to it one of these days
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00284.html (7,864 bytes)

249. Re: [TowerTalk] 10m question (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:01:30 -0800
CB whips have a LOT of sag when used horizontally. They will work but aluminum tubing makes a lot more sense. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00823.html (9,515 bytes)

250. Re: [TowerTalk] receivers for HF phased array (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 16:47:58 -0800 (PST)
It's not that simple. Merely being able to lock the *frequencies* together does nothing to address phase. You will get random phases that change every time you tune the frequency synthesizers in the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00108.html (8,985 bytes)

251. Re: [TowerTalk] AO & "cheap hams" (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:46:55 -0800
Some of us have 100,000 feet of radials. Scrounging is essential at that level for most of us. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supp
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00217.html (7,951 bytes)

252. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials effect uppon reception (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:03:07 -0800
My 160 meter vertical with 20 miles (12 km) of radials is indistinguishable on receive (except for absolute level of signal and noise) from a 30 foot vertical with four 30 foot radials. OTOH, a 40 m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00228.html (8,814 bytes)

253. Re: [TowerTalk] Glen Martin Voyager Hazer (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:43:06 -0800
I'm not surprised. The price of the tracks was astronomical, not to mention the price of the Hazer itself. By the time you got done, you could have bought a crank up tower. It would be interesting t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00393.html (7,671 bytes)

254. Re: [TowerTalk] Glen Martin Voyager Hazer (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:32:41 -0800 (PST)
Speaking for myself; I want to do antenna experiments and don't want to climb to make each change. Also, it is useful to be able to change the height of the antenna as another variable in the experi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00406.html (8,328 bytes)

255. Re: [TowerTalk] How to create discrete phase shift in stack? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:32:12 -0800
You can create a lumped element delay line consisting of a pi network with electrical phase shift of +X degrees if you use shunt capacitors having a reactance of Zo*Cotangent(X/2) and a series induc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00547.html (8,747 bytes)

256. Re: [TowerTalk] lightning bolt (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:06:02 -0800 (PST)
I had an LB quad but replaced it with a 2 element SteppIR. The quad had replaced a KT34, for the reason that it added 17 and 12 meters. I never would have gotten the quad in the first place if the St
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00067.html (7,849 bytes)

257. Re: [TowerTalk] lightning bolt (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:04:33 -0800 (PST)
SteppIR is also a small business, yet it's only problem is that the volume of sales is so high they have trouble making enough antennas, and the price is actually fairly high (expensive but worth it)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00070.html (9,492 bytes)

258. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 Meter yagi - Height recommendation (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 20:26:21 -0800 (PST)
I have A/B'ed 80 meter dipoles at 115 feet high vs 60 feet high. The high one is ~10 dB better on DX and the low one is ~10 dB better on locals (up to 150 miles or so). A really low one (at 30 ft) wa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00113.html (8,374 bytes)

259. Re: [TowerTalk] Guyed Tower with Dyneema rope guys (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 13:06:19 -0800
Antenna guying is what is known as "corner case" in terms of application: 1. Because of wind loading, you need high strength vs diameter. All the "miracle" ropes I've seen are only high strength per
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00161.html (9,307 bytes)

260. Re: [TowerTalk] Analysis of phase errors for transmit phased arrays (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:44:09 -0800 (PST)
I didn't see in the report details of what the arrays were other than # of elements, but the 3rd paragraph says it all: "doesn't necessarily apply to superdirective arrays". There are enormous differ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00300.html (8,314 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu