Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:stevek@jmr.com: 601 ]

Total 601 documents matching your query.

281. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259 vs N (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:00:08 -0700
_______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any ques
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00642.html (7,970 bytes)

282. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259 vs N (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:28:29 -0700
_______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any ques
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00648.html (7,947 bytes)

283. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259 vs N (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:28:49 -0700
_______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any ques
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00683.html (8,189 bytes)

284. [TowerTalk] FW: PL-259 vs N (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:49:48 -0700
Hi Dino, I don't discourage anyone from using anything, just caution based on my experience. We use not dozens, but thousands of the 2-piece N connectors here and they are very much intended for soli
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00687.html (10,319 bytes)

285. RE: RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259 vs N (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:22:06 -0700
Hi Kelly, Maybe, but in general this has not been a problem. The problem is that because of the blind mate, you just can't see if the assembly is going together properly. 100% hipot testing weeds out
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00698.html (11,057 bytes)

286. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259, good ones vs. bad ones (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:24:19 -0700
I agree with Dino on this one. Only caveat about "silver plated with Teflon insulation" is that you usually won't know who made them, since Amphenol does not make UHF connectors with this particular
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00699.html (13,118 bytes)

287. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259, good ones vs. bad ones (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:49:13 -0700
_______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any ques
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00708.html (8,575 bytes)

288. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] The Trojan Horse (BPL) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:50:47 -0700
Doubt a few volts of RF carried by wiring 100+ feet over our heads will do much...especially since they're conducting hundreds of amps at 70kV+ at 60 Hz, at the same time. I'm not at all concerned ab
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00716.html (17,685 bytes)

289. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] Using Belden 9913 on a crankup tower? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 12:47:33 -0700
_______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any ques
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00093.html (9,228 bytes)

290. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Adjusting SWR (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 09:31:11 -0700
146/440 MHz verticals can be tuned at ground level and then simply installed. It's easy to achieve 1/2WL above ground on 146 MHz, that's only a bit over three feet. I've never noticed any change in t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00214.html (9,110 bytes)

291. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] Wire for Radials (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 13:44:16 -0700
Problem with #24 wire is that it's fragile and breaks easily. Using it for radials, I'd be sure to bury those radials beneath the ground so nobody can possibly walk on them, for if they did, the radi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00250.html (8,668 bytes)

292. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Amidon customer satisfaction (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 14:45:04 -0700
This is getting pretty far away from Tower Talk, but actually ISO9000:2001 has changed a great deal from the old, original ISO9000:1994, which was the previous revision of the standard. The 9000:2001
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00293.html (10,930 bytes)

293. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Amidon customer satisfaction (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 15:26:54 -0700
_______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any ques
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00295.html (9,125 bytes)

294. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Amidon customer satisfaction (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 09:15:52 -0700
You know, it is easy to gain that perspective...however I don't agree. The current ISO standard 9000:2001 actually does require data collection for customer satisfaction, it's part of the new standar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00308.html (10,257 bytes)

295. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] Motorola Connectors (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 09:28:56 -0700
Those darn no-coders! Oops, wrong place. I've seen the cable extensions (Motorola female one end, right-angle male installed on the other end) at my local car stereo/alarm installer's shop. If you ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00310.html (7,920 bytes)

296. RE: [BULK] - Re: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Amidon customer satisfaction (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:09:49 -0700
Not terribly surprised. Of course, now that most of their customer service and tech support staff is actually in Bangalore (just look on the opposite side of your globe from Austin, TX), you're lucky
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00316.html (7,865 bytes)

297. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] antenna installation (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 15:38:45 -0700
You can: -Slide the mast way down inside the tower (with the rotor moved out of the way), clamp it that way using the thrust bearing setscrews, and install the "top" antenna; then, slide it up a few
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00520.html (9,210 bytes)

298. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] Looking for tower shipping company recommendations (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 08:59:58 -0700
Last time I did this, within CA, I used Yellow Freight because they have a terminal very close by...they were also competitive. http://www.myyellow.com -WB2WIK/6 "Success is the ability to go from fa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00548.html (8,863 bytes)

299. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Looking for tower shipping company recommendations (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 13:48:33 -0700
Additional comments: -You can find a carrier to use just one truck from origin to destination, without transferring the load at terminals or onto other trucks, if you use a CONSIGNED carrier, rather
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00563.html (9,414 bytes)

300. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] poor man's substitute for LMR-400? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 09:45:39 -0700
Regarding the CommScope coax, I've used it. It's not bad, but quite stiff (at least as "inflexible" as LMR400 or 9913) with a huge recommended minimum bend radius; I wouldn't use it on a crank-up tow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00004.html (9,891 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu