Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:topband@contesting.com: 1810 ]

Total 1810 documents matching your query.

101. Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: Niko Cimbur via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:44:26 -0800
My remote station has been in operation for several years. It is about 10 miles from my house. It is setup for transmitting and receiving. What I found out from participating remotely in a Stew Perry
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00256.html (9,254 bytes)

102. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: Niko Cimbur via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:49:03 -0800
In my interpretation of the rules if an operation is not permitted, sending in a check log by that station would not make it count. Just like someone operating from an entity without a permit and giv
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00272.html (9,006 bytes)

103. Re: Topband: NE7D loaded tower (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Whitney via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 17:06:32 -0500
Here is another data point. SteppIR Monster at the top of a 130ft shunt fed tower full legal limit power from an Acom 2000 on 160m with no problems since 2008. Be sure elements are fully retracted fo
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00287.html (9,043 bytes)

104. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: Niko Cimbur via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 22:26:10 -0800
Here are the rules: http://www.cq160.com/rules.htm "The use of any receiver located away from the main site is strictly prohibited." I gave you my interpretation, and my opinion is that all stations
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00303.html (9,833 bytes)

105. Re: Topband: Preamplifiers (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 23:00:07 +0000 (UTC)
http://active-antenna.eu/amplifier-kit/ From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> To: topband@contesting.com Sent: Monday, February 2, 2015 5:34 PM Subject: Re: Topband: Preamplifiers On Mon,2/2/20
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00013.html (8,307 bytes)

106. Re: Topband: Preamplifiers (score: 1)
Author: Agelos-SV3RF via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 05:52:29 +0000 (UTC)
J310 push-pull HF pre-amp KIT BUILT & TESTED This is also one option, I use it with excelent results.It is sold as a kit also.SV3RF-Agelos Electronics, Radio Communication, Ham, Amateur Radio |   ___
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00021.html (8,214 bytes)

107. Re: Topband: Preamplifiers (score: 1)
Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:13:20 -0500
andy, for many years i used the Palomar preamp. it worked well in the presence of a 50kw AM station on 1550khz. though it may be of older design and there are better pre-amps available it may be avai
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00032.html (9,003 bytes)

108. Re: Topband: Out-of-Turn Callers (score: 1)
Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:30:57 -0500
hi frank, as a matter of courtesy i sent KK6ZM a personal email suggesting that his behavior was totally wrong when calling K1N and that an apology on the topband reflector would be in order. his rep
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00051.html (9,213 bytes)

109. Topband: BoGs, BaGs and BuGs (score: 1)
Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 03:07:29 +0000
I have been contemplating listening antennas, and after hearing a friend work station after station that I could hear only down in the noise on my inverted Vee, while he was using a 500' Beverage on
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00138.html (8,571 bytes)

110. Topband: DX recognition (score: 1)
Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 12:13:25 +0000
HAving been inactive for many years before getting back into ham radio last year, I will not bore the list with my opinions on remote operation and how that is handled. I would like, however, to ask
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00154.html (7,134 bytes)

111. Topband: beverage pols (score: 1)
Author: dl8yhrfrank--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:11:58 -0500
Hi all i woud like to set my? Beverages from 1m high to 2.5m high..some told me it will improve them So now i need new pols to hold the wire I thought about 1m Aluminiumtube? in the ground and inside
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00207.html (7,375 bytes)

112. Topband: Fw: Re: Out-of-Turn Callers (score: 1)
Author: luc kerkhofs via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:48:55 -0800
_________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00213.html (11,279 bytes)

113. Topband: K1N success (score: 1)
Author: Steve Piotrowski via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:19:21 +0000 (UTC)
1717 miles. I got up early yesterday and camped out on 160, waiting for them to come back from a break. They did. In the space of 20 minutes I was able to log them on 160CW, 80CW, and 40CW. Not bad f
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00229.html (7,346 bytes)

114. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: W3AW via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:26:38 GMT
Agree, thanks for not making multiple contacts. Working K1N on 160 with my Index Labs Qrp Plus is a challenge. Kirk W3AW -- Original message-- From: Tom Haavisto Date: Thu, Feb 5, 2015 10:24 PM To: D
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00245.html (10,130 bytes)

115. Re: Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 07:42:49 -0500
I agree. Many times when I was at KH6 at the bottom of the cycle, I would self spot on 10 or 12 since the band was supposedly dead and no one was listening. The boys in EU would be very happy and mor
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00300.html (9,113 bytes)

116. Re: Topband: K1N what time are they QRV on top? (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 23:28:35 +0000 (UTC)
They were very loud at 0100Z here today (last night). They were on 1817.5, QSX up. GL to all... 73, Stew K3ND _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00322.html (8,712 bytes)

117. Topband: Deliberate interference (score: 1)
Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 19:38:22 +0000
"Message: 10 Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 23:58:32 -0500 From: "Tom W8JI"<w8ji@w8ji.com> To:<topband@contesting.com> Subject: Re: Topband: K1N DQRM Tracking Project Message-ID: <94B927F7C90146B19C8C27DE0BC0
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00337.html (8,231 bytes)

118. Topband: K1N DQRM Tracking Project (score: 1)
Author: Dave Bowker via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 21:23:57 +0000 (UTC)
IMHO, the K1N 'DQRM Tracking Project' is fostering perpetrators to flex their muscle and mettle and challenge the status quo.   The K1N web site proclamation " the objective is to identify stations w
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00343.html (7,182 bytes)

119. Topband: 160 Worked All States (score: 1)
Author: Steve Piotrowski via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 23:02:41 +0000 (UTC)
Hi All! So back to this WAS discussion.... I could use MT and ND on CW and Nebraska on SSB. can anybody help a fella out? I'm willing to get up early or stay up late. I'm on eastern time. there are m
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00358.html (6,834 bytes)

120. Re: Topband: BoGs, BaGs and BuGs (score: 1)
Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:41:45 +0000
Sent this before, and not sure it made it, or perhaps it was not worth responding to I have been contemplating listening antennas, and after hearing a friend work station after station that I could h
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00383.html (8,851 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu