Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w0mu@w0mu.com: 993 ]

Total 993 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where were they? (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:04:38 -0700
Rick, I did not work a single VE. I heard a couple of VE3's. I missed IA, ND, SD, NE, MA, ME, RI, VT, AL, LA, MT, NV, UT, WA, WY I heard WY and probably WA. Very strange conditions really. 80 was lon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00090.html (8,620 bytes)

182. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:09:01 -0700
And this entire conversation started with comments about a number of perennial top finishers sending in late, yes LATE logs. Not logs at the deadline, past the deadline. There should probably be sepa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00101.html (13,069 bytes)

183. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:30:37 -0700
Hi all, I have some specific responses to Mike's question below: contesters AND casual >>contesters alike. Contests don't exist for contesters alone. Huh? Contests exist for the competition. Non cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00103.html (11,292 bytes)

184. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:25:52 -0700
I would be curious what the percent is for CQWW, WPX, ARRL DX. "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over." Ben Franklin --Original Message-- From: cq-c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00106.html (10,095 bytes)

185. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:18:24 -0700
irritating. Implied by whom? By a bunch of people that have nothing to do with the log checking. People have taken a great leap from a statement wondering why the same people are always late and tyi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00125.html (11,681 bytes)

186. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:43:42 -0700
Not to mention illegal searches and mandatory drug tests. Over the top and a political stand which has nothing to do with contesting. So far I have yet to hear one compelling argument why logs should
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00133.html (12,962 bytes)

187. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:50:36 -0700
No need to make any changes because we are at the bottom of a cycle that does not want to go up, where conditions on a single band were poor on that day. Look what KA9FOX did QRP with the great 40 an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00136.html (15,071 bytes)

188. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:35:04 -0700
Dave it is just another rule. They also force us to operate for a set period of time with power regulations, mode restrictions etc. They don't ask us to use 599 08 they tell us. What is the differenc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00141.html (16,940 bytes)

189. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:50:23 -0700
"But it is not at all an anomaly that 20m closes near sunset at solar minimum. The typical sunset times in Feb are such that the sun has already set for the midwest and east coast at 0000z. Moving th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00143.html (9,556 bytes)

190. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:32:22 -0700
I get it. I don't think you get it Dave. You still have a choice to operate the contest how you like. If you want to be considered for awards then you follow their rules. Does it matter who makes the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00153.html (21,877 bytes)

191. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:59:32 -0700
Feel free to go to www.contesting.com That site has been around for a long time. Who said anything about scientific. If a poll is not conducted by paid Harvard grads it has no value? I am starting to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00155.html (10,529 bytes)

192. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:23:02 -0700
Actually I think we have. Since it is required by the sponsor it really doesn't matter. I suspect there are good reasons for doing this. I will trust the sponsor and the log checkers just as I have s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00158.html (10,598 bytes)

193. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:26:56 -0700
Don't care works. Neither for nor against. While for open logs because those that check the logs thinks this is a good idea it would not change my contesting style or contests one either way. "A slip
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00161.html (11,585 bytes)

194. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:55:44 -0700
We might as well give those that might be inclined to cheat a complete detail of exactly what the log checkers do to catch those that are not on the up and up. Yeah that makes great sense. What we do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00172.html (12,404 bytes)

195. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:40:39 -0700
"So far I have yet to hear one compelling argument why logs should not be open. Because I don't like it doesn't fly in my book." Quite simply, they are MY logs. The information contained within them
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00177.html (14,668 bytes)

196. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:19:58 -0700
I am curious. Would the logs have been submitted if you had won? I checked the 3830 archives and there is no posting for the CQWW 2008 CW effort. Just curious why? 3830 has nothing to do with CQ and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00178.html (15,284 bytes)

197. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint - more numbers (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:46:41 -0700
Ted, Interesting information there. As Dean pointed out in his post they had 35 members on. That is 105 contacts *if* you can work them on all 3 bands. That is indeed significant. I always thought th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00182.html (12,084 bytes)

198. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stand-up operating position (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:07:16 -0700
Pete, I have not tried it but it certainly could be done. I have seen a number of mobile carts in newer hospitals that have a keyboad tray, Monitory swing arm etc. They were designed to used while st
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00195.html (8,402 bytes)

199. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer and NA CW sprints (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:00:41 -0700
I just received my LP-PAN. You do need a professional grade type sound card to get the full use of this device. Skimmer outputs? A few K3's with this and skimmer would produce some interesting data i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00211.html (9,404 bytes)

200. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer and NA CW sprints (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:06:14 -0700
The original post was about a non participant using skimmer to learn and watch what he could see in a contest. "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get ove
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00223.html (11,430 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu