Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2ev@yahoo.com: 142 ]

Total 142 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] Ajudicating in the Daylight (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 04:59:58 -0800 (PST)
Wouldn't it be nice if contest sponsors blogged? They could easily post all of the rules interpretations that they communicated with each private inquiry -- to the benefit of the entire contesting co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00130.html (6,715 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW Participation (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:47:10 -0800 (PST)
-- Original Message -- Is it common practice for the contesting community to upload their logs to LOTW? -- I do not use LoTW. The last time I checked, it was *significantly* more expensive and compli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00161.html (7,917 bytes)

23. [CQ-Contest] LoTW Supported Awards (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:44:57 -0800 (PST)
Is there a list of awards that are supported via LoTW submissions? Ev, W2EV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00213.html (6,981 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Blogs, changing exchanges and sponsors (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:51:17 -0800 (PST)
Wouldn't it be nice if contest operators could use the search function on the cq-contest web interface? -- Hi Tree, People make all sorts of comments on all sorts of things here. It is difficult to k
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00226.html (7,698 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] LoTW Credit and Application Cost (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:37:20 -0800 (PST)
What is a LoTW credit? Do I still pay the DXCC application fee, in addition to the $0.25 per credit? Thanks...just inquiring to understand. Ev, W2EV _______________________________________________ CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00258.html (6,675 bytes)

26. [CQ-Contest] Where's Waldo [was: section names, SD v SDG] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 06:53:12 -0800 (PST)
KE3Q said: "Seriously, there are people who get on and make their first QSO ever and plenty who don't have any idea what section they're in. " I worked an N2 who gave me a perfect exchange, except fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00345.html (7,748 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Quick question (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 06:58:59 -0800 (PST)
The SS rules say that spotting assistance is allowed for multi-ops. Does this mean general use of the packet cluster, or an op on a second radio? Sorry for the dumb question. -- Hi Guy, I'm intereste
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00346.html (7,764 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check in SS (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 15:27:19 -0800 (PST)
Tom, This is a great opportunity to consider creating a blog on the ARRL web site and begin to document this sort of thing for all eyes to see. Unless Hans had copied the note to the list, we wouldn'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00366.html (8,827 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Earth to Ev .... (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 20:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Ev, it baffles me that you think all this stuff is somehow secret. 1. Anyone can look up years of cq-contest content in the archives 2. Anyone can subscribe to this reflector and participate 3. Anyon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00386.html (8,159 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check in SS (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 21:19:57 -0800 (PST)
Now THAT would be a good use of someone's time! (not) -- Interestingly, companies are now successfully using blogs to do exactly this sort of thing, defusing controversy early and increasing customer
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00388.html (8,322 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Easy way to correct answer (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:12:14 -0800 (PST)
But, what Hans did was correct and something that any of us could have done, and then, no more guessing, you have the answer. Really no need to speculate on an issue when you can just email the conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00411.html (8,224 bytes)

32. [CQ-Contest] Natural Progression [was: CK and stuff] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 04:15:47 -0800 (PST)
In the early days of personal computing, there were no issues with "buffer overrun" exploits (loosly defined as 'sending data that the computer didn't expect or "error trap" for') because everyone pl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00457.html (7,485 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Natural Progression [was: CK and stuff] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:40:59 -0800 (PST)
In your buffer overrun example, you cite a sinister act. How is that in any way like using a convenient fictitious check in SS or using a fictitious name in a contest exchange that requires a name? I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00467.html (7,979 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Easy way to correct answer (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:10:48 -0800 (PST)
Why would you want to? The serial number does not affect score, it is just a piece of info exchanged between stations. For that matter, SS rules do not prescribe that the numbers start at "1", only t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00487.html (9,159 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] SS Packet DANGER, DANGER, Will Robinson!!! (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 04:23:15 -0800 (PST)
The rules say... 2.1.Single Operator: One person performs all transmitting, receiving, and logging functions as well as equipment and antenna adjustments. 2.1.1.Use of spotting assistance or nets (o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00525.html (7,815 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] SS Packet DANGER, DANGER, Will Robinson!!! (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 09:57:15 -0800 (PST)
There are many elements to the spirit of competition, and communicating with others during a contest ON THE AIR is apparently not a violation of anything judging by the responses I've seen. -- While
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00538.html (7,658 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] SS Packet DANGER, DANGER, Will Robinson!!! (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:31:23 -0800 (PST)
George, you gotta go a long way to get from "a friend telling you there's a juicy one on" to "feeding me spotting info on my run frequency." Major difference. I didn't solicit it. -- This is why I'm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00542.html (8,360 bytes)

38. [CQ-Contest] Two Scenarios [was: SS Packet DANGER, DANGER,Will Robinson!!!] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 05:27:36 -0800 (PST)
Tom, Great scenarios! I've edited them into what I think you're saying. -- Original Message -- From: Tom Osborne w7why@verizon.net Scenerio 1. <Boiled down> I have antennas, towers, transceivers, com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00565.html (8,947 bytes)

39. [CQ-Contest] For $0.99 you get... [was: SS Packet DANGER, DANGER,Will Robinson!!!] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 05:36:15 -0800 (PST)
-- Original Message -- I just happened to be listening on my second radio when the CQ'er got the unsolicited info about the VY1 up 7. I go up 7 and work him. Am I "assisted" now, too? -- If you are i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00570.html (7,774 bytes)

40. [CQ-Contest] Knowing vs. Acting [was: SS Packet DANGER, DANGER,Will Robinson!!!] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:04:07 -0800 (PST)
-- Original Message -- some[one] says, "hey, turn your beam a bit south, there's a 5H3 thats been trying to call you for five minutes," you're being forced to recategorize yourself as assisted? -- Kn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00581.html (7,354 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu