Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2up@comcast.net: 333 ]

Total 333 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Morserunner (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:17:08 -0600
From the readme.txt file: VERSION HISTORY 1.68 - TU + MyCall after the QSO is now equivalent to CQ 1.67 - small changes in the HST competition mode. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO ____
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00356.html (7,402 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 06:20:09 -0600
I see no problem with using a CW decoder, until someone is able to run a 200 hour using one :.) I know several guys who used them as a crutch to get them started in CW contesting, and now they do wel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00197.html (9,732 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - a contrarian opinion (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 09:48:09 -0600
I can copy a CQ, my callsign, and a 599 in my head (at regular RTTY speeds). I recall one RTTY DX pileup where there was a lot of QSB and even though his reply didn't print my call, I knew he came ba
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00246.html (8,790 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:36:49 -0600
What's the big deal? Are you hiding something? Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00188.html (15,371 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 06:35:46 -0600
There are no "secrets." Perhaps Ubaldo Jimenez (Colo Rockies pitcher, ERA 1.16) should be placed in a big black box on the mound, with only an opening in the front, so no one can see how he pitches.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00216.html (9,829 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:21:14 -0600
Personally, you're log doesn't interest me. OTOH, if I put in a competitive effort (no longer possible since I moved to a new QTH) I would find it interesting to see some of the top scorer's logs in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00221.html (11,762 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is anyone else pissed off... (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:29:30 -0600
Outrageous for such a downtrodden town. Pete's idea is a good one. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00019.html (9,735 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Nasty Cheerleading in favor of R36F (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 10:28:49 -0600
That's why it should be a CW-only contest - to maintain anonymity of the participants. Otherwise, it's just another DA0HQ-like fiasco. It will be interesting to see K1TTT's analysis. Barry W2UP -- Ba
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00129.html (7,925 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Nasty Cheerleading in favor of R36F (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:13:13 -0600
UA9BA spotted R36F 13 times. He spotted other WRTC stations a maximum of 6 times. UA9CDC spotted R36F 14 times. He spotted one other WRTC stations a maximum of 3 times, and others 0, once, or twice.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00145.html (12,282 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] nastyness in WRTC? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 19:52:18 -0600
Yes, it is a hobby, but a lot of people spent a lot of time, money, and lugged their eqpt half-way around the world for it. That's a lot of effort for a competition.where some participants have an un
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00150.html (8,973 bytes)

31. [CQ-Contest] WRTC full results up (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:58:36 -0600
See http://www.wrtc2010.ru/?id=51&idp=46 And, R36F = UA9CLB - UA9CDV. What a surprise! -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00195.html (6,793 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:13:19 -0600
Jim, What you are missing is the fact that Cluster spots have increased your QSO rate very significantly, compared with the pre-Cluster days. Increased dupes, unfortunately, come along for the ride.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00302.html (9,799 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:41:45 -0600
Paul, I disagree. Some of the big USA multiops have excellent operators. Some have mediocre and poor operators. Some jump on a new packet spot as soon as it hits their screen and throw in their call
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00329.html (15,949 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] 599 (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:05:39 -0600
Why have any exchange at all? CQWW is, in reality, an exchangeless contest anyway... Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00403.html (8,460 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Age related problems in FT1000? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:49:05 -0600
So there is something to be said for pointing and clicking your way through a contest (sorry, couldn't resist). I used a FT1000D with INRAD filters for many years. I replaced it with an IC7800 and, i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00473.html (8,648 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] The King (Packet cluster network) is dead! Long live the King (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:23:31 -0600
If technology does everything, why aren't all the scores the same? Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00522.html (10,199 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:07:15 -0600
I've always thought the guy COPYING the QRP station should get extra points... Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00153.html (9,552 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Meaning of Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:44:03 -0600
Never. Same argument, different year. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00160.html (10,874 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] The danger of packet/cluster use (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:12:13 -0600
Let's be real. Nobody listens to their own call during the exchange. They are busy with radio #2 or something else. Like 599, if it's sent, it's just a placeholder. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP L
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00259.html (11,370 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 17:13:08 -0700
You need to shorten your VOX delay :.) I think guys who don't send their own call in the exchange should be DQ'd, if they submit a log. It's in the rules and not doing it is a violation that allows a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00089.html (10,193 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu