Hans, As you know, all the logs from the 2007 CQWW are now posted publicly. Can you (or anyone else) show an example from any one of the CQWW logs where you can identify a unique strategy that would
Hans, I don't think so. You are making a claim that by having open logs, one can review those logs and indentify operating strategies that an operator might not want to reveal to his competitors. If
Hans, You are claiming that there is a problem with public logs. I'm asking you to provide proof of your claim. You know that asking me to provide proof that your claim is false is a common logical f
2007 SSB logs are here: http://cqww.com/ssblogs.htm 2006 CW logs are here: http://cqww.com/cwlogs.htm The 2007 cw logs should be posted shortly. _______________________________________________ CQ-Con
Quack: Which BARTG contest is your cert for? _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
Art, If you qsy and hear him transmitting, work him. If you qsy and don't hear him transmitting, call *him*. If he does not answer, it would be nice to go back to the original frequency and let him k
Bill, I?m just using your comments to stress how important it is for logs to be submitted to the contest sponsor even if you don't want to compete for anything. If you don't want to compete, please s
Who are these people and where is the evidence of this? 73, Bob W5OV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
What innocent people are being unjustly accused of what? Who are you talking about / defending? Or, is all of this pure speculation without any basis in fact? Bob W5OV Yes Paul, criticism of public l
Just to clarify a bit further, in the case of the CQWW SSB and CW contests that KR2Q was discussing, the allowance for a second station that can work multipliers-only is unique. This rule allows for
Randy, One other thing that someone can do is observe how others who do well in contest (such as yourself and other HOF guys) conduct themselves when running a pileup or while S&Ping a band. Last wee
I had one guy give me 5N as his check. I was surprised at that and don't recall that being commonly done either. --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounce
Hi Jim, The reason is to pay homage to the history and founding of the ARRL. The ARRL's original mission was to relay messages. The ARRL used to be called The "American Radio Relay League" before it
With all due respect to those reminding us about Straight Key Night, I think Tony was not focusing on asking for a contest using a straight key, but rather operating other contests such as SS and oth
There is no requirement to exchange the callsign twice! There is no odd "double portion" of the exchange! Where did you get the idea of someone getting DQ'ed for it? Sheesh. We need some reality here
I think your answer is clear that you will not comply with the rules. The callsign must be sent in the middle of the exchange. I truly cannot believe that this point is being argued at all. You would
Hmmm.... So then, this hobby is not supposed to be "self-policing" as I have been led to believe for the last 35+ years? Since when is peer pressure wrong in this arena? Executioner? Please - spare m
Greg, I have been using Shure E2C "ear-phones" for several years now, and I use them literally for every purpose where I need headphones. The E#C series is no longer made, but the current model SE110
Jukka, In what contest is a dupe in *your* log a negative value? Please explain. 73, Bob W5OV --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] O