Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w8au@sssnet.com: 322 ]

Total 322 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Sun Aug 17 12:55:27 2003
Give Stan the benefit of the doubt.... after all, this rig predates his service at TT and he is, after all, a SALESman. (if he had to keep up with all the engineers and repair guys he would need extr
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00369.html (8,986 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Curious (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Wed May 7 13:22:14 2003
I have not recently read the Scout manuals that I received many years ago, but I don't recall any specification for earphone Z since the audio output is direct. (no transformers) It provides more out
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00169.html (7,781 bytes)

3. [TenTec] OMNI D hand capacitance effects on tuning (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Thu May 8 17:03:11 2003
Actually, TT did not ground the shafts in the Triton and Omni A/D/C series because of the "potential" problems arising from gradual poor connection over time between the wiper spring and the shaft. T
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00202.html (8,229 bytes)

4. [TenTec] New and Coming 60 meter channels (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Thu May 15 00:31:17 2003
My gripe is.... what's wrong with CW on those small limited slots? If it's emphasis is "emergency comms" when 80/40 are not effective, why is CW left out? How many CW signals could we comfortably (or
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00362.html (8,755 bytes)

5. [TenTec] CW on 60m (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Thu May 15 09:13:39 2003
I like that interpretation. Shall we ask Riley? Or just play it safe (?) and don't ask? And, given a good quality signal, who knows whether the CW is coherently generated or a product of keyed audio
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00372.html (9,403 bytes)

6. [TenTec] strange QRM/QRN/RFI source? (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Thu May 15 09:50:06 2003
Agreed. Switching supplies can be some of the worst spectrum polluters. I have had a running battle with a consumer company (Conair) regarding their 18V switching supply that runs a portable "jacuzzi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00373.html (8,893 bytes)

7. [TenTec] New and Coming 60 meter channels (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Thu May 15 23:27:00 2003
Stu: CW is still taught at Ft Huachuca, AZ for ALL services. The emphasis is on Intelligence gathering, not tactical comms. I have a good friend (a Navy Comm Tech 3rd Class) who is slated to attend t
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00445.html (9,366 bytes)

8. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Thu May 15 23:34:33 2003
Sure you will.... a mobile antenna is a lot less than unity gain... More like -10 dB or more at 5 mHz. why? Perry w8au
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00448.html (8,211 bytes)

9. [TenTec] New and Coming 60 meter channels (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Thu May 15 23:40:44 2003
Bob: MARS is exempt from the NTIA regs. Only CAP adopted this criteria. It's designed mainly for "foolproof" operation by non radio people. Perry w8au (NavyMars nnn0vno)
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00450.html (8,262 bytes)

10. [TenTec] Hz, kHz, Mhz, Ghz (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Thu May 15 23:50:04 2003
Well, Old Heinrich (Hertz) had a nice long grey beard, for starters.... I don't think it radiated well.... w8au
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00453.html (9,046 bytes)

11. [TenTec] Fw: [Icom] IC-7800 intell (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Wed May 21 16:25:23 2003
I also rotated the Orion knobs (and all others as we all do) and did not notice any such thing. A bit of bias there? :-) w8au
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00771.html (8,569 bytes)

12. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 14:38:07 2003
Jerry: Having had the Collins pair you speak of, I can attest they both used 3.1 filters, not 2.1. This was the reason I received so many "good quality" reports up into the late 80's, when the typica
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00462.html (9,022 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 20:17:42 2003
Well, they did have an upper freq limit spec as I recall. It was 7.5 kHz. When we ordered BC quality loaded lines from telco years ago it was 7.5 kHz for AM and 15 kHz for FM. I can see the correlati
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00479.html (9,671 bytes)

14. [TenTec] Slightly OT: SSB vs AM (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Tue Apr 22 18:26:09 2003
There was a commercial unit made, think it was called NBVM (narrow band voice modulation) or something similar. It comes to me that Henry radio produced it, or sold it..... (?) ......and Jerry was ri
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00609.html (8,704 bytes)

15. [TenTec] Re: A note of caution or a cautionary note (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Fri Apr 25 21:37:34 2003
Thanks for the crypto lesson.... not bad... :-) Perry w8au
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00710.html (6,871 bytes)

16. [TenTec] Century 21 Sticky Controls (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Sun Mar 9 20:31:28 2003
Tony: I used silicone spray at first.... good for awhile. But, best of all.... replace them with "momentary" bat handle toggle switches..... More professional looking.... no sticking... Ah, modificat
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00375.html (7,925 bytes)

17. [TenTec] Field Day GOTA Station (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Fri Mar 14 20:47:07 2003
Mark: One of the best FD stations is the Triton 4 (540-544). It has the five FD HF bands only. Very functional and simple to operate. No programming course required! Cheap too! Perry w8au
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00579.html (8,138 bytes)

18. [TenTec] Public Opinion (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Tue Feb 4 18:09:34 2003
Oh, my... this is overflowing even my Hip Boots! Time for a YR filter! Whew!
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00233.html (8,889 bytes)

19. [TenTec] Will W5YR be back? (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Tue Feb 11 12:38:10 2003
He'll be back. He embarrassed himself by accidently posting to the list instead of to an individual. Anyone would feel the same. No one is indispensable.... time shows us that. Talent abounds on this
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00473.html (7,362 bytes)

20. [TenTec] Will YR be back? (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Tue Feb 11 13:00:09 2003
Don't forget "condescending attitude"......
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00475.html (7,844 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu