Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w8ji@w8ji.com: 971 ]

Total 971 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Progress with ugly computer noise (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 17:14:06 -0400
Total common mode inductance is 1 times L, not two times L. This is because the windings are parallel with near infinite mutual coupling. It is exactly like a bifilar filament choke. The 2200pF caps
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00065.html (10,951 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: New Linear amp (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 12:48:41 -0400
Here is the tough time with this, because I'm sure most people take device manufacturer's data at surface value. All of this stuff, to this point of time, is mostly vaporware. Here are the worries:
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00081.html (8,153 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: New Linear amp (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 18:58:29 -0400
Hi Bruce, I'm sure Harris did a great job. The modules can be swapped while the TX is on, even power supply modules, which is a nice feature. But hot or live swapping does not mean the modules are "h
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00086.html (10,705 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: Fw: New Linear amp (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 22:40:40 -0400
Right. My point is people seem to be reading the data sheet for the device, which is a very confusing data sheet. The data sheet, if read carefully, is for class-C pulsed duty with (I think) 20% dut
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00090.html (8,745 bytes)

25. Topband: Lightning makes antennas vanish (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 09:34:27 -0400
I've never experienced this before a year or so ago, when I had a Beverage antenna melt in two from a nearby tree getting hit. About a month ago I had about 300 feet of a Beverage just vanish from a
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00096.html (7,679 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: More Amplifier info (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 10:18:27 -0400
Hi Larry, All of the links and data agree with what I found here in my measurements. I think the real issue is some very creative marketing is being done, and the factory data sheets can be a bit con
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00102.html (9,392 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: Lightning makes antennas vanish (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 11:01:50 -0400
No, it was lightning. Here are pictures from an earlier event: http://www.w8ji.com/lightning_strikes.htm Now the problem is making wires vanish for long lengths, hundreds of feet!!! This problem see
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00107.html (8,263 bytes)

28. Topband: Cable shields (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:37:35 -0400
The statement CATV coaxial cables or cables with foil/drain shields do not have good shielding, because of transfer impedance and high resistance, was made a while ago here on this reflector. I think
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00130.html (6,970 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: Cable shields (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:50:57 -0400
I can easily and quickly test any 8 foot length Mike. I just added a scrap from my old Dish network system that blew off the roof last week. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00134.html (7,944 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: Cable shields (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 20:35:09 -0400
I can put a number on that using two-year old indoor-use ComScope "Brite wire" ( I think that is what it said), which is a non-flooded dual shield (foil and braid). 160 -80 dB 80 -88 dB 40 -99 dB I
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00135.html (8,714 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: Cable shields (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 20:48:23 -0400
I can't actually measure it Dave. I have a spare port on my test fixture that is identical to the sample port. When I swap my voltmeter over to that port and run 1 amp of RF current on the tested ca
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00136.html (7,903 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:37:47 -0400
Unfortunately that can lead to a waste of time and material, and even has some bad advice. Common mode chokes NEVER belong between transmitting device like a radio and an amplifier, or between thing
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00139.html (9,320 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:58:46 -0400
Carl, Regardless of what feelings people might have, beads and isolators really do not belong on transmitter lines between amplifiers and radios, or between filters and amplifiers. There isn't any re
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00141.html (8,135 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 06:03:41 -0400
Hi Victor, Beads and common mode chokes only modify common mode impedance on the outside of cable shield. They do this by allowing a voltage difference to appear across the bead or choke. This means
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00145.html (12,313 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:31:24 -0400
Hi Carl, It is much more than experience. Good science can be proven or illustrated through experiments and measurements. Opinions are just opinions, and have the same value as the effort that went i
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00147.html (10,571 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:08:18 -0400
It seems Frank, Jim, myself, and many others are in exact agreement. This is because underlying science is universally logical and valid, and proven both by measurements and by time in thousands of
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00149.html (11,250 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:31:39 -0400
Grounding of equipment on the desk has nothing to do with TVI or RFI, unless you have terrible antenna common mode or other cable issues bringing RF into the shack, or cable or connector issues in t
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00169.html (10,413 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:08:47 -0400
That's exactly what I do periodically when the connectors lose tension. I also use CM chokes (beads) near connectors in case they develop a little bit of resistance. Overall, I have few problems. If
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00170.html (10,972 bytes)

39. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:37:43 -0400
Shielding and grounding is probably the least known art, as are audio line source and load impedances. I had problems with my K3 when I pointed my Yagi's at the house. As a quick fix, I cut into my
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00174.html (12,433 bytes)

40. Re: Topband: Chokes, et. al. (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 08:21:20 -0400
Hi Peter, To which you replied: What everyone should always remember is if we block HF current from a coaxial line to intentionally float a chassis, we elevate the voltage swing of the chassis. This
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00188.html (9,668 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu