Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w9wi@earthlink.net: 225 ]

Total 225 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 20 Dec 2005 08:05:23 -0600
To go in the other direction... what about VHF? I'm probably missing something, but I don't see anything in the SS rules that prevents the use of amateur frequencies above 30MHz. I definitely recall
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00474.html (8,291 bytes)

142. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 20 Dec 2005 08:07:54 -0600
Just be aware that Sprint *does* specify that. (both that you start at 1 and that numbers be sequential) -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com ____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00475.html (8,497 bytes)

143. Re: [CQ-Contest] what defines QRP/LP?? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 02 Jan 2006 23:21:24 -0600
ARRL rules mention only transmitter power output. While I haven't read the rules to the CQ or NCJ contests I'm quite confident they're similar in this respect. For most amateurs I think accurately ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00022.html (8,288 bytes)

144. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Time Calculation (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 04 Jan 2006 09:16:49 -0600
If you're trying to write software that will automatically determine whether the operator is taking an offtime or not, I think you're going to find you don't have enough input to determine it reliabl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00035.html (8,794 bytes)

145. Re: [CQ-Contest] R: QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 04 Jan 2006 09:24:09 -0600
It should be noted that the USA QSL bureau does not handle domestic cards - I cannot send Tom a card through the bureau. I guess that's different from QSL bureau practice in most countries. (that sai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00038.html (8,270 bytes)

146. Re: [CQ-Contest] R: QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 05 Jan 2006 00:43:41 -0600
Not too long ago, I got a card from Japan. (with IRC enclosed) It said "PSE QSL FIRST USA". We don't come much less rare than that<grin>! -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00067.html (9,995 bytes)

147. Re: [CQ-Contest] We Need Sunspots!! (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 08 Jan 2006 13:32:34 -0600
Y'know, I'm beginning to wonder whether what we need is more sunspots - or more people listening in the right place?! Shortly after the 10-Meter Contest, for no particularly good reason, I decided to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00164.html (7,832 bytes)

148. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP and 75 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 22 Jan 2006 16:50:45 -0600
I find it interesting that apparently nobody is harassing the domestic net that meets on 3767. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com Ham stuff for sale: http://www
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00412.html (7,456 bytes)

149. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cordless keyboard / mouse (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 30 Jan 2006 09:34:59 -0600
While probably not directly relevant in the contest station, it might be if you decide to grab another one for the computer in the den: **Don't try to run more than one Logitech wireless keyboard in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00654.html (8,781 bytes)

150. [CQ-Contest] Big Ears awards for 2006 (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 19 Feb 2006 18:55:57 -0600
go to G0IVZ, SN3A, CU7/DL5AXX, 6V6U, and G4BUO. All of whom managed to copy my QRP signal on 80 meters on the other side of the Big Pond in this weekend's contest. 2nd time for G0IVZ, who is the only
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00216.html (6,773 bytes)

151. [CQ-Contest] Contest-free zones (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 28 Feb 2006 11:09:10 -0600
In light of recent requests printed in the pages of QST, I submit my analysis of why it's unnecessary to extend the existing contest-free zones on the HF bands: http://www.w9wi.com/ham/cfz.html -- Do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00324.html (6,915 bytes)

152. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 09 Mar 2006 00:07:57 -0600
As I mentioned on the TCG list, a number of stations on 40m had audio so bad as to be unintelligible. There were at least three stations I didn't call because I couldn't understand what receive frequ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00101.html (7,975 bytes)

153. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx ssb spotting report over modulation (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 09 Mar 2006 08:08:58 -0600
Absolutely, this is an international problem. Or at least, a problem in both SA and EU. (can't say I've ever had a distortion problem with a JA.) I think you're right about this. It's a real challeng
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00105.html (9,375 bytes)

154. [CQ-Contest] Mobile contesting - not permitted? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 07 May 2006 10:14:30 -0500
I enjoyed the current May/June 2006 issue of NCJ on mobile contesting. However... it would seem that in ARRL contests* and the CQ WW, mobile contesting is **not allowed**. I cite ARRL General Rule #3
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00069.html (8,054 bytes)

155. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rig (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 03 Jun 2006 08:20:31 -0500
Good point; I don't think current DSP firmware (in any radio) comes anywhere near reaching DSP's potential. I just bought a HD radio. (USA version of DAB - editorial comments in private email on requ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00058.html (8,987 bytes)

156. Re: [CQ-Contest] June VHF contest and six meter antennas (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 06 Jun 2006 00:17:53 -0500
I've used a 2m 5/8 mobile whip. Both mobile and as a base station. (stuck to a 5' steel bar sitting in the rain gutter) Worked nearly two dozen EU, as well as Tree and J. (VY1JA) running 10 watts at
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00096.html (8,108 bytes)

157. Re: [CQ-Contest] FD observations and suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 29 Jun 2006 07:28:49 -0500
I had someone send that (spelling out "PLEASE") on CW. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing lis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00326.html (8,552 bytes)

158. Re: [CQ-Contest] Accuracy needs to count (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 06 Jul 2006 01:40:17 -0500
If Field Day is an emergency-preparedness exercise and not a contest... then maybe "2A Tennessee" is kinda meaningless as an exchange? To toss out a radical suggestion... Maybe FD should have a REALL
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00028.html (8,106 bytes)

159. [CQ-Contest] Cabrillo logs for cross-checking WRTC entries? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 06 Jul 2006 23:40:33 -0500
I've heard two different addresses for submitting Cabrillo logs for cross-checking the WRTC entries: wrtc-2006@kkn.net logs@wrtc2006.com Which (or both?) is correct? -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00046.html (7,120 bytes)

160. Re: [CQ-Contest] callsigns for wrtc (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 10 Jul 2006 09:07:37 -0500
W1AW/4 worked all PT5 and PW5 suffixes *except*: PT5H PT5S PT5Z PW5H PW5R PW5S Hard to believe we would have missed one that was on, as all the ones we did work we worked on multiple bands. Not sure
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00074.html (7,878 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu