Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa3fiy@radioadv.com: 319 ]

Total 319 documents matching your query.

241. [TenTec] (Fwd) Re: OMNI VII vs. K3 ? Opinions invited., (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:07:57 -0400
-- Forwarded message follows -- From: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> Date sent: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:22:46 +0100 Priority: normal Subject: Re: [
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00461.html (8,546 bytes)

242. Re: [TenTec] Original Orion Firmware (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:14:58 -0400
Greetings John, I use firmware 2.063Xg. Here are the issues I have with the Orion (Classic) firmware 2.063Xg. I think this is beta firmware but it is the first of the V2.xxx firmware that has worked
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00213.html (8,765 bytes)

243. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Data Bus (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:25:00 -0400
The Eagle is a very interesting rig. From the looks of things it will be nice and simple to use while providing great receiver performance once it is set-up. Looks good too! Argonaut V and find it to
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00409.html (9,837 bytes)

244. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Information (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:22:35 -0400
Thanks for that report John. Since the heatsink is now inside the radio, the back panel is a pretty simple piece of steel (?). How about making a replacement back panel that would accommodate a "prop
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00448.html (9,109 bytes)

245. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:41:26 -0400
What a bummer!!! Hopefully some of those folks will post some comments here so those of us who refuse to log on to Yahoo will hear about the rig. If not, that's the price we pay for not being willing
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00261.html (8,001 bytes)

246. Re: [TenTec] FS:SignaLink USB Sound Card (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 13:42:07 -0500
I and many others use the TT 5 pin accessory cable on the Orion with good success. Pins 1 through 5 on the 8 pin Orion connector are the same function as other TT rigs using the 5 pin connector. I fr
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00575.html (11,565 bytes)

247. Re: [TenTec] FS:SignaLink USB Sound Card (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:00:36 -0500
Yes I understand that the O2 is an 8 pin socket. So is the Orion Classic which I use here in addition to a Pegasus, etc. The 5 pin connector on my interface plugs directly into the 8 pin socket on th
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00578.html (10,118 bytes)

248. Re: [TenTec] FS:SignaLink USB Sound Card (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:02:34 -0500
Yes, as far as I know, the SignaLink only does PTT and audio; no true FSK logic. Perhaps someone who has one would confirm or deny that. 73 all and have a very good New Year, -Lee wa3fiy ____________
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00581.html (10,431 bytes)

249. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII ATU Saga (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:35:59 -0500
Curt, maybe the faulty filter was allowing various mixing products to pass through to the output on transmit. If so, the antenna tuner would not likely be able to find a match for the desired frequen
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00539.html (8,447 bytes)

250. Re: [TenTec] CorsairII notch potentiometer (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:06:52 -0500
Jerry (and others), You might check out Mouser part number: 313-2420F-250K This is a dual gang, audio taper, 250K pot. They also list a linear taper version. $2.73 in catalog 637. The only issue I se
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00141.html (9,506 bytes)

251. Re: [TenTec] CorsairII notch potentiometer (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:21:46 -0500
Oooops..... I see the online datasheet for the pot shows bushing plus shaft length as 0.605 inches. BTW, has anyone checked with Ten Tec to see if they have the part in stock? Just wondering. :-) -Le
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00142.html (9,366 bytes)

252. Re: [TenTec] Speaker cable connector (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 14:09:15 -0500
Barry, I use AMP MTA .100" connectors and headers for that purpose among others. They are low cost, very light and compact and will pull apart easily if you take the bottom cover off and forget to di
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00080.html (8,980 bytes)

253. Re: [TenTec] TenTec 200 VFO (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:34:53 -0400
Most L/C vfo's are adjusted at the low frequency end by the inductance (L) and at the high end by the capacitance (C). There is usually some interaction so you have to repeat the adjustment several t
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00244.html (8,297 bytes)

254. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:33:51 -0400
With the Eagle you can easily know what output power you have. There is a "POWER" adjustment, the value of which is displayed on screen. If the ALC light is flashing on voice modulation or on solid o
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00000.html (7,394 bytes)

255. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:04:14 -0400
'Couple things, The difference between 88 watts and 100 watts is about 0.55 db which is slightly less than 0.1 S unit (using 6db per S unit). Can anyone hear that difference under anything other than
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00004.html (8,812 bytes)

256. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:00:55 -0400
Mike, Are you sure your Omni VI should not have left the factory delivering only 80 watts? For that matter, what was it's power output when it left the factory? I ask that because there is a target s
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00015.html (13,996 bytes)

257. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus, High Current Draw on 80 meters (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 13:18:54 -0400
Yep! In my case it was one of the transmitter low pass filter relays went kerflooey. TT has replacements at a great price. 73, -Lee WA3FIY _______________________________________________ TenTec maili
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00134.html (8,193 bytes)

258. Re: [TenTec] Argosy (I) (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:05:59 -0400
John and group, A few years ago I tested about a dozen rigs for use on battery, both CW and SSB where both modes were available. CW and SSB were close to the same power consumption with CW being slig
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00117.html (9,091 bytes)

259. Re: [TenTec] Argosy (I) (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:03:07 -0400
Kris, The Argonaut V under the same conditions was somewhat higher. Argonaut V 5.6A 5.1 hrs. I did the following radios: OHR 100A Century 22 Argonaut 515, pilot lamps on and off Argonaut V Argosy Arg
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00126.html (9,495 bytes)

260. Re: [TenTec] Getting started in digital modes (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:53:08 -0400
John, Have you reversed the mark and space tones by any chance? RTTY requires that the mark and space frequencies have the proper relationship or all you get is gibberish. I think I recall that you a
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-10/msg00214.html (10,023 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu