Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Paddle Opinions? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:11:00 -0400
Good points by by responders to this thread. It is especially true that you should probably stick to iambic if that's what you've been using. I don't really use iambic features, but I need an iambic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00239.html (9,086 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Paddle Opinions (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:56:09 -0400
I have to admit that I don't have redundancy in this matter. Mark me down for a whole bunch of demerits. I made my first paddle for a homebrew TO keyer out of wood with TWO strips of aluminum because
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00277.html (8,086 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Paddle Opinions (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:31:38 -0400
Paul You do yourself an injustice. You do enjoy redundancy, you CAN use an iambic keyer with your single lever paddle, just by using it conventionally. Actually it's good for discipline in sending ,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00298.html (8,710 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Do you have to log QSO times? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:38:43 -0500
I don't remember the contest (probably something on 160M), but I had an LCR report once with mention that 2 Q's did not match in terms of a specified time period ( within 5min??). As I recall, I woun
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00179.html (8,317 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] re-newing the 10 meter contest (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 20:53:52 -0500
< As an example, if I worked N2BJ before I worked you, my exchange to you would be "N7DF GN37 N2BJ".> Gee, Paul, I dunno... if a fair percentage of the casual participants didn't read the rules care
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00158.html (8,257 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:21:12 -0500
< What's with the LDC's (long delayed responses)? Some guys wait 15 or 20 seconds before answering your CQ. Why?> Steve - because some stations ( like me ) haven't done a RTTY contest in almost 2 dec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00051.html (9,739 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] "best practices" (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:29:54 -0500
snip Him: "G3LGK" Me: "3LGQ 5NN WV" Him: "G3LGK TU 5NN100" Me: "G3LGK TU N4ZR" snip I was in the process of posing the same question. It seemed like the practice of correcting ones call could use a d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00504.html (7,209 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Boxing Ring at Dayton (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 06:01:57 -0500
I recall someone actually getting popped at Dayton many, many, many years ago. Dunno if it was over Contest Ettiquette, but only one exchange was transmitted /received .... "K ". Paul WB2ABD ________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00118.html (7,801 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging NEQP + 7QP (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 14:40:02 -0400
A couple of years ago, I used N1MM with the IARU contest template, and worked the County Hunter CW, NEQP, InQP and 7-land all at once. The devil was paid in full by parsing out the logs from the file
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00019.html (8,304 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] The dupes? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:41:00 -0500
ARRL 160 ... imagine getting a dupe from a guy you've known for many years... belongs to the same club ... I haven't been able to broach the subject. Felt like my cat bit me ... like the man said, no
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00342.html (7,938 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] short off times (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:59:50 -0400
" My concern has always been, what does the contest checking software "think" when it sees a string of closely spaced qso's followed by a 5 or 10 or even 15 min interlude and then followed by an hour
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00351.html (7,437 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Comment Summary (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:54:39 -0400
<< Hmmm, I thought the NAQP (North American QSO Party) was really a coast-to-coast QSO party :^) 73. Rick, K6VVA * The Locust >> But it doesn't have 3,077 multipliers ( umm, counties/parishes/distric
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00408.html (8,021 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] 2009 PAQSO Party Announcements (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:24:37 -0400
How about mobile bonus points for nailing a deer or elk? Perhaps a point for each dollar of the insurance claim? It would make up for lost operating time. ABD ________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00010.html (7,406 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Rules - follow up answer (score: 1)
Author: "PTA_ABD" <>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:51:27 -0400
If I also operated from home, then I would think it inappropriate to spot the M/M , or indicate to them any help with spotting mults and such. That sounds like a rule violation. Paul WB2ABD _________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00246.html (6,582 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] SS Musings: Sending the CQer's callsign back (score: 1)
Author: "PTA_ABD" <>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:43:56 -0500
This wasteful practice saved me from having three busted calls ... all dyslexiated by my poor typing. The other station corrected me all three times. Preferable to having a TNX, QSL, NR, GM ( or comb
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00255.html (7,618 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY RoundUp logs (score: 1)
Author: "PTA_ABD" <>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:09:44 -0500
I and a few others got bounces when emailing the log file. We did the "cut & paste > web page" route suggested as an alternative, and did receive a confirmation after doing that. Paul WB2ABD one of t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00145.html (6,755 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] What Do You Do about US Stations Calling US in (score: 1)
Author: "PTA_ABD" <>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:12:21 -0500
I just worked them and continued along. It's faster than explaining anything, and doesn't hurt your log ... keeps your rhythm going. What I find interesting is the report you get from US contacts ...
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00302.html (7,374 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Contest logging question (score: 1)
Author: "PTA_ABD" <>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 19:18:10 -0500
Well, the CW abbreviation for that decimal is "R", so how about "R5"? N1MM accepts it in the field. No massaging necessary. WB2ABD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00143.html (8,405 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] NYQP plaque (score: 1)
Author: "PTA_ABD" <>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:59:45 -0400
My thanks to the RDXA , WNYDXA and sponsors for the beautiful NYQP plaque. I don't get many of them, so I can't wait to hang it on the wall. You guys did a fabulous job, and all within 6 months. Paul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00426.html (6,510 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend..... (score: 1)
Author: "PTA_ABD" <>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:31:01 -0500
Sometimes the station worked will send the call of the non-identifying run station ... a good case for sending the call back. The real annoying circumstance I ran into this past weekend was waiting f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00542.html (8,650 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu