Mail Archive Search: <+from:wn3vaw@fyi.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:wn3vaw@fyi.net: 180 ]

Total 180 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:43:40 -0400; Again, pending a reply from the eHam Review Sections Editor(s), let's not jump to conclusions as to WHY the aforementioned review was moved. We've already had a couple of implications that this was d; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00431.html (9,983 bytes)
82. [TenTec] What's with the 526 (6N2)? (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 21:31:36 -0400; Larry, Well, FWIW: Although I don't own a 526 (yet), Dave W3HND from my club does. I asked him a few weeks back what he thought about it when I found this out, and this is what he said: -- It's ok! i; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00461.html (10,172 bytes)
83. [TenTec] Argonaut V - taking orders now (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 18:37:49 -0400; I think we have to wait until the rig is in production before you'll see a product review. A review of one of the prototypes would be interesting but not neccesarily fully relevant. 73, ron wn3vaw "Y; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00133.html (8,939 bytes)
84. [TenTec] Argonaut V - taking orders now (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 19:12:22 -0400; I'm curious. I know the first three Argonauts are the 505, 509, and 515. So if the new one is the fifth... which one did I miss seeing? (Must have blinked!) 73, ron wn3vaw "You are a fluke of the Uni; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00138.html (7,980 bytes)
85. [TenTec] Six of one Argonaut... (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 10:20:16 -0400; Thanks to everyone who's responded to date on my query on the "fourth" Argonaut in the series. Almost everyone's agreed that the first three are the 505, 509, and 515. But... -- Some people are telli; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00152.html (7,821 bytes)
86. [TenTec] Dayton and the 516 (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 23:46:56 -0400; Considering that the two Argonaut V's were not production items yet, and considering the number of people handling the two rigs (you could not get near the 516 or the Orion on Friday), I wouldn't be; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00341.html (9,391 bytes)
87. [TenTec] Dayton and the 516 (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 23:49:44 -0400; Well, after I finally got a look at the 516 & the Orion on Friday, I got W3WH to come over and examine them too. Note to Scott: I sold that 516 for you -- the one Bill ordered on Saturday. Worked on; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00342.html (10,720 bytes)
88. [TenTec] Re: Dayton news: Orion concern (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 23:56:44 -0400; Cosmetics aren't everything, and from what I saw in terms of capabilities, I think the Orion will compete just fine. Not just Scott but all of the TenTec staff I talked to were very enthusiastic. Sor; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00343.html (9,444 bytes)
89. [TenTec] Re: Dayton news: Orion concern (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 10:56:26 -0400; One other general observation I thought I'd mention... There were big crowds on Friday at Kenwood, ICOM, Yaesu, and TenTec. At Yaesu, the crowds were the four big lines of people waiting to get their; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00349.html (9,788 bytes)
90. [TenTec] screen (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 09:43:51 -0400; Actually John, I think the whole discussion of the screen color and knob esthetics and size of the logo are indicative of a major change in thinking on commercially built equipment. Should we be conc; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00388.html (11,163 bytes)
91. [TenTec] Orion Concern (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 14:21:29 -0400; Nah, the answer can't be that black-and-white. 73, ron wn3vaw "You are a fluke of the Universe You have no right to be here And whether you can hear it or not, The Universe is laughing behind your ba; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00462.html (8,046 bytes)
92. [TenTec] The Big Picture (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 18:08:59 -0400; Well, the good news is, Ten Tec gets a nice mention in the "Hamvention" article that is currently sitting at the ARRL web site. Both the Orion and the Argonaut V are specifically discussed. The bad n; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00483.html (6,880 bytes)
93. [TenTec] CQ Announces 2002 Amateur Radio Hall of Fame Class (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 15:06:10 -0400; CQ Magazine has announced 44 inductees for the Amateur Radio Hall of Fame this year. Full details of the announcement can be found at http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2002/05/31/102/?nc=1 Of special; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00669.html (7,683 bytes)
94. [TenTec] Performance Measures in QST (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 22:22:40 -0400; I'll gladly test one for free! I figure it should take, oh, about 18-24 months to really put an Orion through it's paces... ...hey, it's worth a try... 73, ron wn3vaw And now, the 2002 Version of the; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00267.html (11,169 bytes)
95. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:29:21 -0400; Are we discussing Ten Tec or descending into mindless and factless League bashing? I think you guys have lost sight of who pays the big bills at ARRL advertizing. Now how would you write your report?; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00310.html (8,327 bytes)
96. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:42:15 -0400; I see. So because the commercial consumer audio products magazines never write critical reviews in order to not hurt the advertisers; and the ARRL sells ad space in QST; therefore ARRL doesn't write; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00317.html (11,312 bytes)
97. [TenTec] The W8KC Virtual Ten*Tec Museum (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:04:20 -0400; Paul, I think you have the wrong caption on that picture. Shouldn't it read "Dude! You're Buying a Ten Tec!"? 73, ron wn3vaw And now, the 2002 Version of the Jack Bogut Memorial Joke: Why are they se; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00340.html (7,416 bytes)
98. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 16:00:09 -0400; We only have QST? What are CQ, 73, and Worldradio, chopped liver? 73, ron wn3vaw "There's No Crying in Baseball!" -- Jimmie Dugan, "A League of Their Own" The real problem is we don't have a consumer; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00442.html (10,932 bytes)
99. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 19:04:35 -0400; Well, that was an interesting set of replies. Especially in consideration of a thread earlier this week on test results from the ARRL Lab. On the one hand, we have those who will rely on the reviews; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00445.html (12,233 bytes)
100. [TenTec] Possible explanation for problem(s) with Jupiter finals (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 19:27:15 -0400; Steve, I've been in touch with Larsen's grandson, Larsen E. Rapp III K3IOU, over at the WPA Chapter of the DXH&PDS. He was somewhat saddened to hear the news, since they've been estranged ever since; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00493.html (9,216 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]