Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:xdavid@cis-broadband.com: 950 ]

Total 950 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45 Question (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:03:20 -0700
Carl, you pretty much avoided Steve's question. What rotator failure mode is minimized by having two thrust bearings above the rotator? Can you give any examples of your YCCC buddies that would back
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00668.html (12,156 bytes)

82. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Rohn 45 Question (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:19:24 -0700
Possibly you should reread my posting ... A plate (positioned between the rotator and the top thrust bearing) with a hole (but without a thrust bearing mounted on it) positions the mast laterally jus
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00673.html (14,142 bytes)

83. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Regalvanize (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:04:01 -0700
Tell them there is also an ANSI spec that prohibits voids in the galvanizing for structural members. Ask them to show you that spec and convince you they complied with it. The only one I found online
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00757.html (9,743 bytes)

84. [TowerTalk] HAM RADIO magazine on DVD (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:54:22 -0700
Assuming these are legal copies, the price is right .... http://tinyurl.com/2xqtbz* *Dave AB7E* * _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00769.html (9,031 bytes)

85. Re: [TowerTalk] Inv L Directivity (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:40:19 -0700
Could you guys maybe have it reversed? Every time I've modeled an Inverted-L with EZNEC the directivity is in favor of the direction AWAY from the top loading wire. The only exception I've found seem
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00837.html (9,215 bytes)

86. Re: [TowerTalk] I thought that this was a tower group! (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:33:56 -0700
Here's the very first sentence on the web page where you signed up: "TowerTalk is for discussion of tower and HF antenna construction topics." My guess is that "TowerTalk" was an easier mouthful than
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00001.html (7,550 bytes)

87. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:40:18 -0700
This is the kind of bad information that just never seems to die. A tuner ... ANY tuner .... simply tries to provide a proper impedance transformation between the antenna (or combination of antenna a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00205.html (10,419 bytes)

88. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:13:57 -0700
Yes, I think that is exactly the case. I've both modeled and used (Field Day) center fed non-resonant dipoles as well as off-center fed dipoles, and the impedance effects represent the major differen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00229.html (10,918 bytes)

89. Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom with IC-737 (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:24:02 -0700
Well, he did say "less the coax and tuner IR losses", and I assume he was including coax dielectric losses in that qualifier. Other than whatever minor IR losses there may be in the antenna itself,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00230.html (8,504 bytes)

90. [TowerTalk] Tower Climber (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:14:28 -0700
Check out this "safety belt" ... http://youtube.com/watch?v=2ZJz6qLI-Fo Dave AB7E _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing lis
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00302.html (6,992 bytes)

91. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Climber (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:22:38 -0700
I just realized someone might think that I was the "Dave" on the tower in the video. Definitely not. Dave AB7E _______________________________________________ ________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00303.html (7,679 bytes)

92. Re: [TowerTalk] Delorme data bases (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:12:04 -0700
HFTA uses a very simple text format for the terrain files. It's simply two spaced columns of numbers like this: 0 h0 d1 h1 d2 h2 d3 h3 etc, where d# is distance from the antenna and h# is the elevati
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00345.html (8,772 bytes)

93. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper grounding bus bar (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:28:12 -0700
A couple of other sites with a large selection of metal products (copper, brass, aluminum) are: www.speedymetals.com www.onlinemetals.com Both sell online in small quantities. 73, Dave AB7E Mark Beck
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00379.html (10,088 bytes)

94. Re: [TowerTalk] Ufer ground using copper wire (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:07:11 -0700
I assume you mean the top end of the copper clad steel ground rod shouldn't be embedded in the concrete, and that is true. But if he buries the Cadweld joint (wire to ground rod) in the dirt below th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00456.html (10,809 bytes)

95. [TowerTalk] Exploding Foundations (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:37:32 -0700
I'm firmly in the camp that says exploding foundations are a myth. I've spent hours and hours searching the internet and haven't been able to find a single documented case of a grounded tower foundat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00498.html (10,454 bytes)

96. Re: [TowerTalk] Exploding Foundations (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:55:43 -0700
Hi, Jim. I think we mostly agree here. You make a good devil's advocate, though ;) Regarding copper corrosion, if the ground environment was as extreme as you say, my guess is that any ground rods (c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00502.html (10,317 bytes)

97. Re: [TowerTalk] Exploding Foundations (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:36:32 -0700
Hi, Gary. Yes, I agree. I didn't mean to say that concrete cannot explode. It certainly can, and non-uniform heat accomplishes the task quite well. I just don't believe that concrete is **more likely
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00511.html (10,426 bytes)

98. Re: [TowerTalk] From the perspective of a concrete technician (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:28:51 -0700
The only problem with that is that the tower base already represents a very low impedance conductor embedded in the concrete. It is THE lowest impedance conductor in the system. In the case of many t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00524.html (10,644 bytes)

99. Re: [TowerTalk] From the perspective of a concrete technician (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:07:05 -0700
I think this is the official IRC requirement for a "concrete encased electrode". It always seemed kind of marginal to me, but this is minimum spec: "An electrode encased by at least 2 inches of concr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00525.html (10,536 bytes)

100. Re: [TowerTalk] exploding concrete (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:56:09 -0700
Jim, If I understand you correctly, there was a large shunt path to ground around the foundation (the 4 straps). Yet the lighting still apparently entered the foundation and generated cracks when it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00529.html (9,559 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu