Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:zr@jeremy.mv.com: 406 ]

Total 406 documents matching your query.

101. Re: Topband: Where to place a preamp? Switching Beverages? (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:15:36 -0500
That is a very misleading statement typical of all revisions and corrections to that book. Any loss before the first active device will degrade the MDS, noise figure, SNR, or whatever else you wish t
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00212.html (9,171 bytes)

102. Re: Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 07:43:16 -0500
Deliberate QRM and other bad behavior has been on 160 ever since it was opened to all frequencies, 1500W (and a lot more by some), and 160 included on every rig and amp. There are very few who operat
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00249.html (12,326 bytes)

103. Re: Topband: Switching direction with Slinky Beverage (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:02:25 -0500
Why not one rod and just switch the antenna wire between the resistor and transformer primary? The relay would be a SPDT at the antenna side. Whichever end is floating shouldnt have any effect. Place
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00279.html (8,812 bytes)

104. Re: Topband: Caged Inv-L - Pros and Cons ? (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:08:57 -0500
Id expect the lower RF resistance of 2X more wire would help also. My only cage experience were a pair of 1/4 wave verticals for 80 that were also fed as half waves on 40 at a prior QTH here in the s
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00304.html (9,585 bytes)

105. Re: Topband: T Vertical feed (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:43:24 -0500
All coils have loss so its a decision as to which one do you want? If the coax loss is minimal and the amp loads into it thats the one Id take and then add radials until there is no further meaningfu
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00322.html (12,080 bytes)

106. Re: Topband: Transformer isolation vs common mode choke was: Re: T Vertical feed (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:06:47 -0500
That might have been me as Ive been a bit vocal about it. A typical balun is wound as an autotransformer with all leads having a common DC point and wound together which provides little to no isolati
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00364.html (13,723 bytes)

107. Re: Topband: Beverages Noise (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:03:30 -0500
A common mode choke, made by winding many turns of the coax around a ferrite core, would help. The best core to use is Fair-Rite mix #31, and you want at least 14 turns through a 2.4-inch outer diame
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00001.html (7,758 bytes)

108. Re: Topband: Receiver protection using PIN Diode technology (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:51:14 -0500
See what the lastest rigs are using to switch front end bandpass filters. In the 80's my job involved using PIN's in RF modems as low as 5MHz. Considering their measured performance I modified my TS-
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00022.html (10,550 bytes)

109. Re: Topband: 2Wire, Inc. 3800HGV-B Gateway. RFI --Problem fixed for now.. (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 11:13:22 -0500
Im running 250' of shielded CAT5 from house to equipment trailer where the router resides and then another 120' up the tower to the 5.8GHz link. Its bundled with the hardline feedlines, rotor and rel
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00042.html (9,896 bytes)

110. Re: Topband: 2Wire, Inc. 3800HGV-B Gateway. RFI --Problem fixed for now.. (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 14:14:42 -0500
Im well aware of that but the only noise generator in that system was the router switching PS and I replaced that with a linear one. Over the years Ive spent days or weeks eliminating noise sources g
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00052.html (10,655 bytes)

111. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:50:24 -0500
Ive seen a few that use copper tubing wrapped around a 55 gallon plastic drum and a 30-40' vertical element! Im running a top loaded T supported off the side of the 180' tower and elevated radials. C
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00138.html (11,865 bytes)

112. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:01:59 -0500
The broadcasters also dont fall for the resonance bit either; very few radiators plus radials have anything to do with an actual resonance. All of this was explained back in the 30's. Carl KM1H _____
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00139.html (12,885 bytes)

113. Re: Topband: Amazing Video of an extremely large circular array (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:32:56 -0500
. That was the birth of EME, not a resurgance. Sam, W1FZJ, made the first EME contact just a few years before moving from MA to PR. I was one of his antenna "apes" in MA as his favorite saying was "i
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00176.html (9,151 bytes)

114. Re: Topband: Amazing Video of an extremely large circular array (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:51:09 -0500
W1BU was the club call for the Rhododendron Swamp VHF Society in Medfield, MA and never left there until it expired and was reissued years later. Sams son Pat, W1HIV, still lives there. Carl KM1H ___
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00177.html (11,806 bytes)

115. Re: Topband: 160m dethroned? 600m the new top band? (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:24:57 -0500
Several are working well over 500 miles at night and 300 daytime with under 100W into similar antennas and that is with regular CW. ERP is often under 10W mainly due to a small radial field. Carl KM1
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00193.html (9,417 bytes)

116. Re: Topband: 160m dethroned? 600m the new top band? (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:16:46 -0500
Somewhere, somebody managed to get a TS-940 to transmit down there at around the 10 milliwatt level out of the transverter port. Ive been looking for that info but no luck yet. Carl KM1H -- Original
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00204.html (10,030 bytes)

117. Re: Topband: Vertical vs yagi (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:53:34 -0500
FWIW I get well over 20dB side nulls from a 2el Cushcraft clone and about 15-20dB off the rear which varies by arrival angles. With a pair stacked the rejection is often better and beinng able to upp
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00224.html (11,337 bytes)

118. Re: Topband: A rare Boring Report (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 15:36:03 -0500
I suspect it will become a battle between traditional CW and the digi modes in such a small assignment. Building a transverter to go with any xcvr would likely be easier than a scratch built CW rig.
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00290.html (8,668 bytes)

119. Re: Topband: Topband list and 630 Meters - the decision (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:58:44 -0500
I recently talked to Ken Gordon, W7EKB, who owns 600mrg@w7ekb.com, the 600M experimental group forum about opening it up to hams that are interested in learning more about the new 630M band before it
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00317.html (9,103 bytes)

120. Re: Topband: EIRP Measurement (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:37:16 -0500
This may be of interest to a few as applied to either band. Fritz was the force behind getting the first experimental license and after a few years of lobbying getting the ARRL to get behind it. http
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00318.html (8,682 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu