Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\"Conventional\"\s+current\s+flow\s*$/: 81 ]

Total 81 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 01:28:11 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Sounds like another case of physicists creating a mathematical model of something and gradually coming to believe the model is the reality. The Big Bang
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00019.html (9,622 bytes)

62. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: K9FFK <k9ffk@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 19:29:49 -0600
OK, Jim! Good explanation. I can agree with that speed. I should have been more precise. My point was that the electrons were moving very fast and drifting about as in a wire and the electrons are ca
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00020.html (18,002 bytes)

63. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 03:37:48 +0000
No. In other devices (electrochemical cells, semiconductors depending on doping), they do because the charge carriers are not electrons. And its still just as irrelevant to any actual engineering. Th
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00024.html (9,579 bytes)

64. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 04:42:18 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Wrong there too. Lots of people deny that. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00026.html (8,915 bytes)

65. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 15:18:14 +0000
I can't like that model of the electrons moving slowly but the charges moving fast. When it comes to simplistic models, I much prefer the one I saw in the instruction manual of a didactic toy, when I
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00029.html (11,348 bytes)

66. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 19:10:27 -0600
This is interesting. "Spooky action at a distance"? :-) 73, Mike The description of the electrons in a metal, or anywhere else, is quantum mechanical. ... the amazing thing about the electron is that
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00037.html (9,984 bytes)

67. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Carroll" <w2wg@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 21:39:52 -0500
See the first "filming" of an electron at http://phys.org/news/2008-02-electron.html . This was done in 2008. Later it was possible to see an image of an electron orbiting a nucleus ( electron orbiti
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00041.html (11,546 bytes)

68. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 01:35:24 +0000
Jim's post, reprinted in full below, is incomprehensible nonsense. Everyone but Jim knows what "current" is: The liquid-like movement of particles such as water molecules, air molecules or electrons.
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00202.html (15,338 bytes)

69. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 20:27:37 -0600
Jim's post, reprinted in full below, is incomprehensible nonsense. ( SIGH ) And just when I was warming up to Jim's theory. Don W4DNR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing lis
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00203.html (8,977 bytes)

70. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Garland" <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 20:41:40 -0700
Hey Bill, Why're you picking on me? I'm just the messenger, here! Really, I'm not making this stuff up. What I've said is what the entire scientific community believes, and also virtually every elect
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00206.html (11,304 bytes)

71. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Vic Rosenthal <k2vco.vic@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:05:27 +0200
I don't think what he wrote is either incomprehensible or nonsense. I don't pretend to understand quantum mechanics intuitively (maybe humans, whose ability to understand things developed from the ne
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00209.html (15,367 bytes)

72. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:49:36 -0600
Dear Bill, I didn't know you had gotten into the fake news business. 73 Rob K5UJ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00221.html (8,314 bytes)

73. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 15:02:45 -0500
Jim and Bill: I see wind was mentioned. When we say North Wind, that means the wind is coming from the North, but my weather vane points to the south. The wind called the north wind blows to the sout
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00227.html (13,084 bytes)

74. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 15:52:34 -0500
Jim and Bill: I see wind was mentioned. When we say North Wind, that means the wind is coming from the North, but my weather vane points to the south. The wind called the north wind blows to the sou
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00229.html (10,136 bytes)

75. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 14:27:17 -0800
Actually, the diagrams I've seen of the earth's magnetic field show the north geographic pole as being near the *South* magnetic pole. So your compass needle has a north pointing north magnetic pole
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00232.html (8,851 bytes)

76. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 23:23:29 +0000
At one time the entire scientific community believed the earth was flat, there were only four elements, the sun revolved around the earth and disease was caused by "vapors". Current is not an abstrac
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00233.html (11,430 bytes)

77. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 23:28:40 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: If I said something incorrect I'd like to hear about it. Please tell. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Am
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00234.html (8,772 bytes)

78. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 18:44:58 -0500
Current, as it applies to water, wind etc. requires a direction AND a speed. -- Mike, WV2ZOW _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00235.html (12,087 bytes)

79. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 20:07:52 -0600
Maybe the guy painting the ends of the needles grabbed the wrong color Don W4DNR Actually, the diagrams I've seen of the earth's magnetic field show the north geographic pole as being near the *South
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00241.html (9,882 bytes)

80. Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow (score: 1)
Author: Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:57:51 +0000 (UTC)
Typical example: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/imgmag/mearthbar.gif Cathy Subject: Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow To: amps@contesting.com Date: Friday, December 9, 2016,
/archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00244.html (10,084 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu