Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Alpha\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Alpha\s*$/: 67 ]

Total 67 documents matching your query.

41. [AMPS] alpha (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 07:50:09 -0700; ? Depends on the band. On 160m, The stock Tune-C does not have nearly enough C for two tubes and a Q of 10. . Also bypass-type doorknob caps were used for 160m tuned circuit padders. Also, the L tap; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00040.html (7,542 bytes)
42. [AMPS] alpha (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 10:09:55 -0600; Due to the voltage sag in a stock 77SX to around 3300v, you can expect a little less than 4 kw out with around 120 watts drive. I have bought/sold several of these. An ugly gold painted one can go f; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00041.html (7,416 bytes)
43. [AMPS] alpha (score: 1): Author: w2ge@home.com (Phil Levin W2GE); Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 12:28:45 -0500; I believe one of these recently sold on EBAY for about 4800.00 GL if those tubes aren't 100%. Phil W2GE -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administ; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00048.html (6,803 bytes)
44. [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: "Paul Kraemer" <elespe@lisco.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:01:18 -0600; What in your expert opinion(s) would be a reasonable price to offer for an Alpha 89 in clean cosmetic but unknown electrical not gauranteed condition. I assume the tubes are in it but don't even know; /archives//html/Amps/2012-02/msg00249.html (6,315 bytes)
45. Re: [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: "Cliff K3LL" <K3LL@EEContent.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:24:37 -0800; Hi Paul, There are so many unknowns it would be difficult to offer more than scrap metal value. Sounds like someone is trying to sell a dream. 73, Cliff K3LL What in your expert opinion(s) would be a; /archives//html/Amps/2012-02/msg00251.html (7,414 bytes)
46. Re: [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:06:04 -0500; I'm no expert and not knowledgeable on the 89, but: #1 You need to know a lot more about it! If it's nearby and you can pick it up would it be possible to inspect it and test it at its location. IE,; /archives//html/Amps/2012-02/msg00252.html (8,629 bytes)
47. Re: [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:05:00 -0500; Its like buying a near luxury car. Low volume, high priced and mostly cosmetics since there is nothing special about the driveline......until it needs repair parts. Carl K1MH ________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2012-02/msg00253.html (10,168 bytes)
48. Re: [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:03:20 -0500; I'm no expert and not knowledgeable on the 89, but: #1 You need to know a lot more about it! If it's nearby and you can pick it up would it be possible to inspect it and test it at its location. IE,; /archives//html/Amps/2012-02/msg00254.html (8,382 bytes)
49. [Amps] alpha (score: 1): Author: <k7awbgoog@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 17:24:11 -0700; Whats the latest on Alpha? I need my 9500 amp fixed. 73 Steve k7awb Nine mile falls, wa _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c; /archives//html/Amps/2016-09/msg00068.html (6,689 bytes)
50. Re: [Amps] alpha (score: 1): Author: <w8hw@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 10:48:17 -0400; Hello Steve, What is the problem you are having with your Alpha 9500? Are you getting an error number? If so what? Any additional information that comes to your mind? 73, Bruce, W8HW == Whats the lat; /archives//html/Amps/2016-09/msg00083.html (7,895 bytes)
51. [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: Charles Hedrick <cchedrick@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 17:10:08 -0400; Still make great amps, to bad they aren't supporting the Legacy Amplifiers that many of us keep in operation. Cam WA4JKW _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contest; /archives//html/Amps/2017-10/msg00028.html (6,666 bytes)
52. Re: [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 14:27:35 -0700; I am getting quite a chuckle out of this "discussion". Folks expect a manufacturer to keep supporting a 30 - 35 year old Amp ??? Have you tried buying parts for your multi-kilobuck whiz-band radio th; /archives//html/Amps/2017-10/msg00030.html (7,607 bytes)
53. Re: [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 16:39:00 -0700; Some of us can afford to do that. It took me 60 years in ham radio to be able afford a USED 87A. Before that, it was USED Ten Tec Titans. The virtues of the 87A for my application are PIN diode QSK,; /archives//html/Amps/2017-10/msg00035.html (7,807 bytes)
54. Re: [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: Chris Wright via Amps <amps@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 00:00:29 +0000 (UTC); Re contacting Mike Dishop. A well know Buisness Person has been trying to contact Mike Dishop for over the past 2 months without any luck or replies. He has tried both the New Number and old numbers; /archives//html/Amps/2017-10/msg00036.html (8,725 bytes)
55. Re: [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 14:24:42 +1300; Boo f'n hoo. I been trying to contact one bloke who I want something from, for three years. Did he reply? NOOOOOO! Try rewording the email so it sounds worth his while to reply. S _________________; /archives//html/Amps/2017-10/msg00037.html (7,983 bytes)
56. Re: [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: Shon Edwards <sre.1966@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 19:30:59 -0600; I look for all kinds of parts that are old. Common? Maybe not. Cheap? Yes. Cheapo? Not necessarily. E.g., was transferring super-8 movies to digital last year. Bulb broke. A new one was indeed availa; /archives//html/Amps/2017-10/msg00038.html (9,980 bytes)
57. [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 07:36:30 -0700; Some of us can afford to do that. It took me 60 years in ham radio to be able afford a USED 87A. Before that, it was USED Ten Tec Titans. The virtues of the 87A for my application are PIN diode QSK,; /archives//html/Amps/2017-10/msg00042.html (9,577 bytes)
58. Re: [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: GWP <gm5bkc@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 09:04:25 -0600; I figured out the life of a vacuum relay (RJ1, HC1, GH1, all rated for 2 million cycles) in QSK contesting in CQing and also S&P. When running (holding a freq and calling CQ) you get about 20,000 QSO; /archives//html/Amps/2017-10/msg00043.html (8,340 bytes)
59. Re: [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 08:20:12 -0700; That's not the experience of contesters. The issue is the number of operations. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contest; /archives//html/Amps/2017-10/msg00045.html (7,891 bytes)
60. Re: [Amps] Alpha (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 00:29:25 -0400; At first blush that number looks very low to me. After all, there are quite a few very active contest stations here in New England that do 10,000-20,000 QSOs per year and you don't hear lots of stor; /archives//html/Amps/2017-10/msg00053.html (9,706 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]