Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+MOSFET\s+biasing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+MOSFET\s+biasing\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] MOSFET biasing (score: 1): Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:35:46 -0500; Anyone have any experience with biasing MOSFET's for linear service, specifically the MRF174? I have a 144 MHz 600 watt amp that uses 3 boards of pairs in push-pull. The existing bias arrangement swi; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01133.html (7,103 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] MOSFET biasing (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:44:06 -0400; Am I correct in assuming that I would be better of with a circuit that would allow me to set the bias on each individual transistor or should the bias voltage be the same for each push-pull pair? Dan; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01136.html (7,141 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] MOSFET biasing (score: 1): Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:34:44 +0100; Danny Pease wrote: Anyone have any experience with biasing MOSFET's for linear service, specifically the MRF174? I have a 144 MHz 600 watt amp that uses 3 boards of pairs in push-pull. The existing b; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01143.html (8,408 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] MOSFET biasing (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:37:13 +0200 (CEST); the point where IM in good crystal filters limits receiver performance with them.< You could do that with bipolars 30 years ago, too. Lower frequency filters (1.4MHz) tend to better than high frequen; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01146.html (7,563 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]