Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+RG\-213\s+Hi\s+pot\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+RG\-213\s+Hi\s+pot\s+\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] RG-213 Hi pot ? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 09:53:11 -0700; Does anybody know how much max V is on RG-213 ? Like what are the results if a hi-pot tester used.. and say cranked up to the point where just a few microamps occurs . I have an application where I n; /archives//html/Amps/2019-05/msg00024.html (7,074 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] RG-213 Hi pot ? (score: 1): Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq72@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 18:13:42 +0100; I think 213 will take that easily. It was a while ago, but I'm sure that I couldn't detect any leakage on 213 with my tester maxed out at 16kV. A local 'maker' group used it to repair a 35kV lead on; /archives//html/Amps/2019-05/msg00033.html (7,925 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] RG-213 Hi pot ? (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>; Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 18:02:18 -0400; Just dont use old coax. Ive personally seen 6KV used in an industrial app and have heard of it run at 9KV. The 5KV Mil Spec is just that....built to a spec but with sufficient overhead which is the n; /archives//html/Amps/2019-05/msg00039.html (8,489 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] RG-213 Hi pot ? (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 08:10:09 -0500; Interesting, I was curious on this also, so Googled it and Pasternack has a datasheet for RG-213U and it says it is only 5K Max. Operating Voltage(VRMS): 5000 https://www.pasternack.com/images/Produc; /archives//html/Amps/2019-05/msg00042.html (9,097 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] RG-213 Hi pot ? (score: 1): Author: Steve <g8gsq72@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 15:10:33 +0100; Indeed, other brands give the same number. I wonder if they all measure exactly the same result? If you search for voltage breakdown figures for the polyethelyene dielectric you'll find numbers from; /archives//html/Amps/2019-05/msg00043.html (10,032 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] RG-213 Hi pot ? (score: 1): Author: John Bodine <john.bodine@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 20:27:24 -0400; I think the have wire you want to use is GTO-15; good for 10 kV. The coax wasn't made for HV duty. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.c; /archives//html/Amps/2019-05/msg00046.html (11,053 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] RG-213 Hi pot ? (score: 1): Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 17:30:50 -0700; Most specs today are written by the Legal Department, with no understanding the technology. Working voltage can vary greatly, depending on how the cable is terminated. Years ago, I used an IR Scope (; /archives//html/Amps/2019-05/msg00048.html (10,448 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] RG-213 Hi pot ? (score: 1): Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 22:07:41 -0500; I've hipotted a lot of 213. Never seen any leakage at 15KV DC which is the max on my. If you put 259 on them, the BDV is around 4500 V though. The weak spot on this sort of cable is not the cable i; /archives//html/Amps/2019-05/msg00050.html (11,501 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]