Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+PAQP\s+Multipliers\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] PAQP Multipliers (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 13:27:28 -0600
So, could someone explain to me why the PAQP organizers have chosen the following multipliers for in-state participants: 71 USA ARRL Sections 13 Canadian Entities The 13 Canadian entities are not the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00112.html (7,122 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] PAQP Multipliers (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:00:40 -0400
The reason for the difference between our sections and the new RAC sections was explained to me as an example: Imagine if MA, CT NH, VT, RI, and ME were put in to a single section called NES. Thanks
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00118.html (8,132 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu