Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remote\s+operation\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Tue Dec 28 10:14:17 1999
I have previously tried some of the old DTMF based systems via UHF links and found them very frustrating for DXing and impossible for contesting. I also did some work with a TS870 using the RCP progr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00260.html (8,489 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:19:49 -0700
I don't "miss" your point, Paul. I simply do not accept it as valid. A strict implementation of your requirement to be "independent of all other communications modes and communications technologies"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00356.html (9,720 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:54:13 -0700
I am in the fire service and we joke about this..../fire service/ being /200 years/ of tradition unimpeded by progress Apparently many in Ham radio have no desire for progress or change unless it is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00357.html (10,891 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:20:46 -0800
Yeah, I noticed the scoreboard is missing in the NAQP and the CQ160 contest. I miss it here. It was a lot of fun to watch. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00360.html (9,221 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:00:30 +0300
Perfectly agree with you Hans! During the mid 80's we started experimenting with computerized DUPE-checking and a bit later also logging, using the technique of that time, a Macintosh computer with a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00368.html (13,341 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:27:08 -0500
Lessee, For Field Day 1985 and subsequent years, I wrote a macro using Lotus 123 with my brand new HP-110 computer (512 KB memory 4.x MHz CPU) all in memory - no hard drive, no floppy disk. Lotus 123
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00385.html (9,138 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:36:04 -0500
I remember W6YY living in Los Angeles using a UHF link to run his contest station in the late 1950's. The remote was about 5 miles away. Skip forward to the mid 1990's. W2AH (SK) used an AEA device o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00392.html (8,284 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:29:59 -0400
Someone recently pointed out a provision in the Russian DX test rules as support for his premise that some contest organizers frown on remote operation. This was the rule in question: "*5.1.2* Using
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00217.html (7,525 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Felipe J. Hernández <np4zet@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:24:42 -0400
Seems to me that remote is merely the use of a very long microphone/Key cable. Not sure why some want to make it an RF issue or even an internet communication issue. The communication is done over re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00243.html (7,602 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: W4AAW@aol.com via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 11:18:31 -0400
Paul, EI5DI, says he knows that most or all remote operations are running "unattended.". Well, how can he know this? He surmises it because he suffers from a visceral hatred of any remote operation.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00076.html (7,670 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Martin Monsalvo - LU5DX <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 13:10:29 -0300
With all due respect Mike, I don't think Paul's logging software is a third or fourth rate app. I've used it several times when entering contests SO1R unassisted and it performed flawlessly for that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00082.html (9,406 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 10:50:22 -0500
Totally out of line! 73...Stan, K5GO Sent from Stan's IPhone _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00084.html (8,491 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 12:26:41 -0400
I don't have a problem with remote contesting either, as long as it is done legally and ethically. The legality under CEPT for US operations at best is undetermined. ARRL regulatory has one opinion w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00086.html (10,325 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:01:49 -0600
Why it is out of line? I have taken far more abuse on the forum than that. Paul does not like anything to do with ham radio and the internet. Honestly I am shocked he has an internet connection or su
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00089.html (9,506 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 17:30:20 +0000
I can (and do) disagree with many views held by EI5DI, and I can express that disagreement without demonizing the man or disparaging his programming skills. 73, HB -- 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00091.html (9,706 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 21:25:27 +0000
Greetings All I am a bit confused here - as it appears are many others Assume I am a visitor to the USA and a contest operator asks me to join a multi op station. I do not have a USA callsign what yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00098.html (12,092 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 22:31:09 +0100
Here we go again, with W4AAW being economical with the truth. What I said was "it is common practice for such stations to be unattended". I know this, and we all know it. Nowhere did I say "most or a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00100.html (12,560 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 15:37:12 -0400
The rules for operating KU1CW are governed by FCC Part 97. Although not explicitly stated in Part 97, its clear that CEPT rules would only apply if the remote operator is the control operator. As lon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00102.html (15,226 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 20:14:14 -0700
Likewise on both counts. BTW -- it's not easy to work my station on 80CW from EI, but Paul's in my log on that band. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00108.html (8,866 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 20:29:01 -0800
FWIW Any station running completely unattended is going to have trouble staying on the air for a full contest, especially if they are running High Power. No matter how automated one gets, sometimes,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00109.html (11,422 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu